Brian Fennessy, Liam Cotter, Nicole W Simons, Lora E Liharska, Girish N Nadkarni, Douglas M Ruderfer, Alexander W Charney
{"title":"Pharmacologic and genetic evidence converge on mechanisms of psychotic illness.","authors":"Brian Fennessy, Liam Cotter, Nicole W Simons, Lora E Liharska, Girish N Nadkarni, Douglas M Ruderfer, Alexander W Charney","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03456-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness afflict millions of people worldwide, and it is largely unknown whether these two forms emerge through the same molecular mechanisms. Though genetic studies have implicated thousands of genes in idiopathic psychotic illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia), consensus is lacking regarding which of these genes are most likely to treat psychotic illness when modulated pharmacologically and, as a result, antipsychotic medications targeting these genes have yet to be developed. Previous studies suggest that one way to determine if a candidate target gene is likely to lead to an effective treatment for a given illness is if the gene is implicated by multiple lines of evidence (e.g., genetic, pharmacologic). Here, pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data were leveraged to determine if the idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness are related to one another through a common set of genes. A set of medications that cause psychotic illness as a side effect (\"propsychotics\") were identified by analyzing 15 million medication side effects reports from over 100 countries. Gene products targeted by propsychotics overlapped significantly with those targeted by antipsychotics and for many of the overlapping targets propsychotics act through a mechanism that was qualitatively the opposite of the mechanism through which antipsychotics act (e.g., activation vs. inhibition). Propsychotic and antipsychotic target genes were significantly enriched for genes implicated in schizophrenia by rare loss-of-function genetic variation but not for genes implicated in schizophrenia by common genetic variation. Only one gene - GRIN2A, encoding the GluN2A subunit of the NMDA glutamate receptor - was implicated in psychotic illness by propsychotics, rare loss-of-function genetic variation, and common genetic variation. Mining genetic data from a diverse cohort of 30,000 adults treated in a New York City health system, a carrier of a rare loss-of-function variant in GRIN2A with severe psychotic illness was identified with a clinical course notable for psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits that are not targeted by current antipsychotics. Altogether, this report shows how integrating pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data from large cohorts can prioritize target genes for novel drug development and align the prioritized targets with specific clinical presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03456-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness afflict millions of people worldwide, and it is largely unknown whether these two forms emerge through the same molecular mechanisms. Though genetic studies have implicated thousands of genes in idiopathic psychotic illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia), consensus is lacking regarding which of these genes are most likely to treat psychotic illness when modulated pharmacologically and, as a result, antipsychotic medications targeting these genes have yet to be developed. Previous studies suggest that one way to determine if a candidate target gene is likely to lead to an effective treatment for a given illness is if the gene is implicated by multiple lines of evidence (e.g., genetic, pharmacologic). Here, pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data were leveraged to determine if the idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness are related to one another through a common set of genes. A set of medications that cause psychotic illness as a side effect ("propsychotics") were identified by analyzing 15 million medication side effects reports from over 100 countries. Gene products targeted by propsychotics overlapped significantly with those targeted by antipsychotics and for many of the overlapping targets propsychotics act through a mechanism that was qualitatively the opposite of the mechanism through which antipsychotics act (e.g., activation vs. inhibition). Propsychotic and antipsychotic target genes were significantly enriched for genes implicated in schizophrenia by rare loss-of-function genetic variation but not for genes implicated in schizophrenia by common genetic variation. Only one gene - GRIN2A, encoding the GluN2A subunit of the NMDA glutamate receptor - was implicated in psychotic illness by propsychotics, rare loss-of-function genetic variation, and common genetic variation. Mining genetic data from a diverse cohort of 30,000 adults treated in a New York City health system, a carrier of a rare loss-of-function variant in GRIN2A with severe psychotic illness was identified with a clinical course notable for psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits that are not targeted by current antipsychotics. Altogether, this report shows how integrating pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data from large cohorts can prioritize target genes for novel drug development and align the prioritized targets with specific clinical presentations.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.