Pharmacologic and genetic evidence converge on mechanisms of psychotic illness.

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Brian Fennessy, Liam Cotter, Nicole W Simons, Lora E Liharska, Girish N Nadkarni, Douglas M Ruderfer, Alexander W Charney
{"title":"Pharmacologic and genetic evidence converge on mechanisms of psychotic illness.","authors":"Brian Fennessy, Liam Cotter, Nicole W Simons, Lora E Liharska, Girish N Nadkarni, Douglas M Ruderfer, Alexander W Charney","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03456-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness afflict millions of people worldwide, and it is largely unknown whether these two forms emerge through the same molecular mechanisms. Though genetic studies have implicated thousands of genes in idiopathic psychotic illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia), consensus is lacking regarding which of these genes are most likely to treat psychotic illness when modulated pharmacologically and, as a result, antipsychotic medications targeting these genes have yet to be developed. Previous studies suggest that one way to determine if a candidate target gene is likely to lead to an effective treatment for a given illness is if the gene is implicated by multiple lines of evidence (e.g., genetic, pharmacologic). Here, pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data were leveraged to determine if the idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness are related to one another through a common set of genes. A set of medications that cause psychotic illness as a side effect (\"propsychotics\") were identified by analyzing 15 million medication side effects reports from over 100 countries. Gene products targeted by propsychotics overlapped significantly with those targeted by antipsychotics and for many of the overlapping targets propsychotics act through a mechanism that was qualitatively the opposite of the mechanism through which antipsychotics act (e.g., activation vs. inhibition). Propsychotic and antipsychotic target genes were significantly enriched for genes implicated in schizophrenia by rare loss-of-function genetic variation but not for genes implicated in schizophrenia by common genetic variation. Only one gene - GRIN2A, encoding the GluN2A subunit of the NMDA glutamate receptor - was implicated in psychotic illness by propsychotics, rare loss-of-function genetic variation, and common genetic variation. Mining genetic data from a diverse cohort of 30,000 adults treated in a New York City health system, a carrier of a rare loss-of-function variant in GRIN2A with severe psychotic illness was identified with a clinical course notable for psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits that are not targeted by current antipsychotics. Altogether, this report shows how integrating pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data from large cohorts can prioritize target genes for novel drug development and align the prioritized targets with specific clinical presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03456-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness afflict millions of people worldwide, and it is largely unknown whether these two forms emerge through the same molecular mechanisms. Though genetic studies have implicated thousands of genes in idiopathic psychotic illnesses (e.g., schizophrenia), consensus is lacking regarding which of these genes are most likely to treat psychotic illness when modulated pharmacologically and, as a result, antipsychotic medications targeting these genes have yet to be developed. Previous studies suggest that one way to determine if a candidate target gene is likely to lead to an effective treatment for a given illness is if the gene is implicated by multiple lines of evidence (e.g., genetic, pharmacologic). Here, pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data were leveraged to determine if the idiopathic and substance-induced forms of psychotic illness are related to one another through a common set of genes. A set of medications that cause psychotic illness as a side effect ("propsychotics") were identified by analyzing 15 million medication side effects reports from over 100 countries. Gene products targeted by propsychotics overlapped significantly with those targeted by antipsychotics and for many of the overlapping targets propsychotics act through a mechanism that was qualitatively the opposite of the mechanism through which antipsychotics act (e.g., activation vs. inhibition). Propsychotic and antipsychotic target genes were significantly enriched for genes implicated in schizophrenia by rare loss-of-function genetic variation but not for genes implicated in schizophrenia by common genetic variation. Only one gene - GRIN2A, encoding the GluN2A subunit of the NMDA glutamate receptor - was implicated in psychotic illness by propsychotics, rare loss-of-function genetic variation, and common genetic variation. Mining genetic data from a diverse cohort of 30,000 adults treated in a New York City health system, a carrier of a rare loss-of-function variant in GRIN2A with severe psychotic illness was identified with a clinical course notable for psychotic symptoms and cognitive deficits that are not targeted by current antipsychotics. Altogether, this report shows how integrating pharmacologic, genetic, and clinical data from large cohorts can prioritize target genes for novel drug development and align the prioritized targets with specific clinical presentations.

药理学和遗传学证据集中在精神疾病的机制上。
特发性和物质诱导形式的精神疾病折磨着全世界数百万人,这两种形式是否通过相同的分子机制出现在很大程度上是未知的。尽管遗传学研究表明,在特发性精神病(如精神分裂症)中存在数千种基因,但在药理学调节下,这些基因中哪一种最有可能治疗精神病,目前还缺乏共识,因此,针对这些基因的抗精神病药物尚未开发出来。先前的研究表明,确定候选靶基因是否可能导致对特定疾病的有效治疗的一种方法是,该基因是否受到多种证据(例如,遗传学,药理学)的牵连。在这里,利用药理学、遗传学和临床数据来确定特发性和物质诱导形式的精神疾病是否通过一组共同的基因相互关联。通过分析来自100多个国家的1500万份药物副作用报告,确定了一组导致精神疾病的药物(“前精神病药物”)。前精神病药物靶向的基因产物与抗精神病药物靶向的基因产物明显重叠,并且对于许多重叠的靶点,前精神病药物的作用机制在质上与抗精神病药物的作用机制相反(例如,激活与抑制)。促精神病和抗精神病靶基因在与精神分裂症有关的基因中显著富集,而在与精神分裂症有关的基因中则不富集。只有一个基因——编码NMDA谷氨酸受体GluN2A亚基的GRIN2A——与精神病前发病、罕见的功能丧失遗传变异和常见遗传变异有关。从纽约市卫生系统接受治疗的30,000名成年人的不同队列中挖掘遗传数据,发现患有严重精神病的GRIN2A罕见功能丧失变体携带者具有显着的精神病症状和认知缺陷的临床病程,目前的抗精神病药物未针对这些症状和认知缺陷。总之,本报告展示了如何整合来自大型队列的药理学、遗传学和临床数据,以确定新药开发的优先目标基因,并将优先目标与特定的临床表现结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信