Anticipating critical view of safety challenges in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis patients: Can we predict them earlier?

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Arnetta Naomi Louise Lalisang, Davin Nathan Wijaya, Indah Jamtani, Vania Myralda Giamour Marbun, Lam Sihardo, Febiansyah Ibrahim, Agi Satria Putranto, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Yarman Mazni, Toar Jean Maurice Lalisang
{"title":"Anticipating critical view of safety challenges in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis patients: Can we predict them earlier?","authors":"Arnetta Naomi Louise Lalisang, Davin Nathan Wijaya, Indah Jamtani, Vania Myralda Giamour Marbun, Lam Sihardo, Febiansyah Ibrahim, Agi Satria Putranto, Wifanto Saditya Jeo, Yarman Mazni, Toar Jean Maurice Lalisang","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Identifying the critical view of safety (CVS) is crucial in this procedure to prevent complications, but achieving CVS can be challenging, necessitating bailout procedures. This study analyzes factors influencing CVS identification and describes bailout procedures used when CVS identification fails.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We collected data from symptomatic cholelithiasis patients undergoing LC at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from January to October 2023. Factors contributing to CVS identification failure were analyzed, and bailout procedures were described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 107 symptomatic cholelithiasis patients, the mean age was 50.38 years, with the majority being female (55.14% of whom were female). CVS was identified in 88 patients (82.24%). Univariate analysis showed that history of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [odds ratio (OR) 5.46], Bile duct (BD) stent (OR 16.53), and diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute, OR 6.17; chronic; OR 4.00) significantly increased CVS identification failure risk. Multivariate analysis identified BD stent as the only significant risk factor (OR 7.41). Higher failure rates were associated with Parkland scores of 4-5, Nassar scores of 4, and G10 scores of 4-5. Among those with CVS identification failure, 5 completed cholecystectomy via top-down approach, 6 underwent subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, 6 underwent subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, and 2 converted to open cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predicting CVS identification failure using preoperative parameters and intraoperative scoring systems is crucial for anticipating surgical complexity and ensuring timely intervention. History of ERCP, BD stent presence, and cholecystitis diagnosis were significant predictors of CVS identification failure. Intraoperative scoring systems reliably predicted CVS identification failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Identifying the critical view of safety (CVS) is crucial in this procedure to prevent complications, but achieving CVS can be challenging, necessitating bailout procedures. This study analyzes factors influencing CVS identification and describes bailout procedures used when CVS identification fails.

Material and methods: We collected data from symptomatic cholelithiasis patients undergoing LC at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from January to October 2023. Factors contributing to CVS identification failure were analyzed, and bailout procedures were described.

Results: Among 107 symptomatic cholelithiasis patients, the mean age was 50.38 years, with the majority being female (55.14% of whom were female). CVS was identified in 88 patients (82.24%). Univariate analysis showed that history of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [odds ratio (OR) 5.46], Bile duct (BD) stent (OR 16.53), and diagnosis of cholecystitis (acute, OR 6.17; chronic; OR 4.00) significantly increased CVS identification failure risk. Multivariate analysis identified BD stent as the only significant risk factor (OR 7.41). Higher failure rates were associated with Parkland scores of 4-5, Nassar scores of 4, and G10 scores of 4-5. Among those with CVS identification failure, 5 completed cholecystectomy via top-down approach, 6 underwent subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy, 6 underwent subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy, and 2 converted to open cholecystectomy.

Conclusion: Predicting CVS identification failure using preoperative parameters and intraoperative scoring systems is crucial for anticipating surgical complexity and ensuring timely intervention. History of ERCP, BD stent presence, and cholecystitis diagnosis were significant predictors of CVS identification failure. Intraoperative scoring systems reliably predicted CVS identification failure.

对有症状的胆石症患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性挑战的预测:我们能更早地预测它们吗?
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗症状性胆石症的金标准。识别安全的关键观点(CVS)在这个过程中是至关重要的,以防止并发症,但实现CVS可能是具有挑战性的,需要救助程序。本研究分析了影响CVS识别的因素,并描述了当CVS识别失败时使用的救助程序。材料和方法:我们收集了2023年1月至10月在Cipto Mangunkusumo医院接受LC治疗的有症状的胆石症患者的数据。分析了导致CVS识别失败的因素,并描述了救助程序。结果:107例有症状的胆石症患者,平均年龄50.38岁,以女性居多(占55.14%)。88例(82.24%)患者出现CVS。单因素分析显示,内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)病史[优势比(OR) 5.46],胆管支架(OR) 16.53,胆囊炎诊断(急性,OR 6.17;慢性的;OR 4.00)显著增加CVS识别失败风险。多因素分析发现BD支架是唯一显著的危险因素(OR 7.41)。较高的失败率与Parkland评分为4-5分、Nassar评分为4分和G10评分为4-5分相关。在CVS识别失败的患者中,5例行自上而下入路胆囊切除术,6例行开窗次全胆囊切除术,6例行重构次全胆囊切除术,2例转为开窗胆囊切除术。结论:应用术前参数和术中评分系统预测CVS识别失败对预测手术复杂性和确保及时干预至关重要。ERCP病史、BD支架存在和胆囊炎诊断是CVS识别失败的重要预测因素。术中评分系统可靠地预测CVS识别失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信