Associations Between Cannabis Messaging and Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Product Perceptions, Use, and Use Intentions Among a Sample of US Young Adults.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Cassidy R LoParco, Matthew E Rossheim, Yuxian Cui, Darcey M McCready, Katelyn F Romm, Yan Wang, Y Tony Yang, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg, Hannah Szlyk, Erin Kasson, Carla J Berg
{"title":"Associations Between Cannabis Messaging and Derived Psychoactive Cannabis Product Perceptions, Use, and Use Intentions Among a Sample of US Young Adults.","authors":"Cassidy R LoParco, Matthew E Rossheim, Yuxian Cui, Darcey M McCready, Katelyn F Romm, Yan Wang, Y Tony Yang, Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg, Hannah Szlyk, Erin Kasson, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2530786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act, derived intoxicating cannabis products (DICPs) emerged as largely unregulated products; meanwhile, traditional cannabis use has increased. To inform effective prevention, research is needed to assess differences in motives for using cannabis <i>only</i> versus <i>both</i> cannabis and DICPs, as well as use-related consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed survey data (June-November 2023) from 4,031 US young adults ages 18-34 (average age = 26.9; 63.9% White; 59.0% female; aiming for ∼50% past-month cannabis use). The analytic sample included participants reporting past-month cannabis use (<i>n</i> = 1,968). Two cross-sectional mediation models were conducted to examine: 1) cannabis use motives (social/cognitive enhancement and coping) in relation to use-related consequences (psychophysiological and sociobehavioral) <i>via</i> use category (cannabis-only vs. cannabis-DICP co-use) and 2) consequences in relation to use category <i>via</i> use motives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 54.4% reported cannabis-only use and 45.6% reported cannabis-DICP co-use. Greater enhancement and coping motives were associated with cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use). Regarding Model #1, lower cannabis coping motives and cannabis-DICP use (vs. cannabis-only use) were associated with greater psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences, and the associations between coping and enhancement motives and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly mediated <i>via</i> cannabis-DICP co-use. For Model #2, lower psychophysiological and greater sociobehavioral consequences were associated with greater coping and enhancement motives, greater sociobehavioral consequences was associated with higher odds of cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use), and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly associated with cannabis-DICP co-use through enhancement and coping motives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the risks associated with cannabis and DICP use, future intervention and prevention efforts should focus on the observed associations to reduce risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2530786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the 2018 Agricultural Improvement Act, derived intoxicating cannabis products (DICPs) emerged as largely unregulated products; meanwhile, traditional cannabis use has increased. To inform effective prevention, research is needed to assess differences in motives for using cannabis only versus both cannabis and DICPs, as well as use-related consequences.

Methods: We analyzed survey data (June-November 2023) from 4,031 US young adults ages 18-34 (average age = 26.9; 63.9% White; 59.0% female; aiming for ∼50% past-month cannabis use). The analytic sample included participants reporting past-month cannabis use (n = 1,968). Two cross-sectional mediation models were conducted to examine: 1) cannabis use motives (social/cognitive enhancement and coping) in relation to use-related consequences (psychophysiological and sociobehavioral) via use category (cannabis-only vs. cannabis-DICP co-use) and 2) consequences in relation to use category via use motives.

Results: Overall, 54.4% reported cannabis-only use and 45.6% reported cannabis-DICP co-use. Greater enhancement and coping motives were associated with cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use). Regarding Model #1, lower cannabis coping motives and cannabis-DICP use (vs. cannabis-only use) were associated with greater psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences, and the associations between coping and enhancement motives and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly mediated via cannabis-DICP co-use. For Model #2, lower psychophysiological and greater sociobehavioral consequences were associated with greater coping and enhancement motives, greater sociobehavioral consequences was associated with higher odds of cannabis-DICP co-use (vs. cannabis-only use), and psychophysiological and sociobehavioral consequences were indirectly associated with cannabis-DICP co-use through enhancement and coping motives.

Conclusions: Considering the risks associated with cannabis and DICP use, future intervention and prevention efforts should focus on the observed associations to reduce risk.

在美国年轻人样本中,大麻信息与衍生精神活性大麻产品感知、使用和使用意图之间的联系。
背景:自2018年《农业改进法案》以来,衍生的令人陶醉的大麻产品(dicp)成为基本上不受监管的产品;与此同时,传统大麻的使用量也在增加。为了为有效预防提供信息,需要进行研究,评估仅使用大麻与同时使用大麻和dicp的动机之间的差异,以及与使用有关的后果。方法:我们分析了2023年6月至11月4,031名18-34岁的美国年轻人(平均年龄26.9岁;63.9%的白人;59.0%的女性;目标是过去一个月大麻使用量达到50%)。分析样本包括报告过去一个月吸食大麻的参与者(n = 1968)。采用了两个横断面中介模型来检验:1)大麻使用动机(社会/认知增强和应对)与使用相关后果(心理生理和社会行为)通过使用类别(大麻与大麻- dicp共同使用)和2)通过使用动机与使用类别相关的后果。结果:总体而言,54.4%的人报告仅使用大麻,45.6%的人报告大麻与dicp共同使用。更大的增强和应对动机与大麻- dicp共同使用有关(与大麻单独使用相比)。关于模型1,较低的大麻应对动机和大麻- dicp使用(与仅使用大麻相比)与更大的心理生理和社会行为后果相关,并且应对和增强动机与心理生理和社会行为后果之间的关联通过大麻- dicp共同使用间接介导。对于模型2,较低的心理生理和较大的社会行为后果与较大的应对和增强动机有关,较大的社会行为后果与较高的大麻- dicp共同使用几率相关(与仅使用大麻相比),心理生理和社会行为后果通过增强和应对动机与大麻- dicp共同使用间接相关。结论:考虑到大麻和DICP使用的相关风险,未来的干预和预防工作应侧重于观察到的关联,以降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信