Reliability assessment of two production lines using joint progressively type-II censored XLindley samples.

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
I Elbatal, Ahmed Elshahhat, H E Semary, Mazen Nassar
{"title":"Reliability assessment of two production lines using joint progressively type-II censored XLindley samples.","authors":"I Elbatal, Ahmed Elshahhat, H E Semary, Mazen Nassar","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11493-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ssessing the reliability of two production lines, whether individually or simultaneously, is of significant importance for improving manufacturing processes and guaranteeing superior product quality. This paper examines the reliability assessment of two production lines utilizing joint progressively Type-II censored samples derived from the XLindley distribution. In addition to estimating the unknown parameters, the reliability functions for each production line, as well as for both production lines simultaneously, are analyzed. Both classical likelihood-based and Bayesian methodologies are employed for estimation purposes. The maximum likelihood method is applied to obtain point estimates for the unknown parameters and reliability functions, while Bayesian analysis is performed under the squared error loss function, employing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique to generate samples from the posterior distribution. The approximate confidence intervals, percentile bootstrap confidence intervals, and the highest posterior density credible intervals for the unknown parameters and various reliability functions are discussed. The problem of selecting the optimal censoring plan is also considered. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted to assess the performance of the proposed methods, comparing the accuracy and efficiency of the estimates across different censoring schemes. Furthermore, the applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through the analysis of two real-world data sets, underscoring its practical utility within the field of reliability. Finally, three criteria, namely A-optimality, D-optimality, and F-optimality, are considered to determine the optimal censoring plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11493-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ssessing the reliability of two production lines, whether individually or simultaneously, is of significant importance for improving manufacturing processes and guaranteeing superior product quality. This paper examines the reliability assessment of two production lines utilizing joint progressively Type-II censored samples derived from the XLindley distribution. In addition to estimating the unknown parameters, the reliability functions for each production line, as well as for both production lines simultaneously, are analyzed. Both classical likelihood-based and Bayesian methodologies are employed for estimation purposes. The maximum likelihood method is applied to obtain point estimates for the unknown parameters and reliability functions, while Bayesian analysis is performed under the squared error loss function, employing the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique to generate samples from the posterior distribution. The approximate confidence intervals, percentile bootstrap confidence intervals, and the highest posterior density credible intervals for the unknown parameters and various reliability functions are discussed. The problem of selecting the optimal censoring plan is also considered. A comprehensive simulation study is conducted to assess the performance of the proposed methods, comparing the accuracy and efficiency of the estimates across different censoring schemes. Furthermore, the applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated through the analysis of two real-world data sets, underscoring its practical utility within the field of reliability. Finally, three criteria, namely A-optimality, D-optimality, and F-optimality, are considered to determine the optimal censoring plan.

采用联合渐进式ii型截尾XLindley样品对两条生产线进行可靠性评估。
评估两条生产线的可靠性,无论是单独的还是同时的,对于改进制造工艺和保证卓越的产品质量都具有重要意义。本文利用来自XLindley分布的联合渐进式ii型截尾样本检验了两条生产线的可靠性评估。除了估计未知参数外,还分析了每条生产线的可靠性函数,以及同时分析了两条生产线的可靠性函数。经典的基于似然的方法和贝叶斯方法都被用于估计目的。采用极大似然法对未知参数和可靠性函数进行点估计,在误差平方损失函数下进行贝叶斯分析,采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗技术从后验分布中生成样本。讨论了未知参数和各种可靠性函数的近似置信区间、百分位自举置信区间和最高后验密度可信区间。同时还考虑了最优过滤方案的选择问题。为了评估所提出方法的性能,进行了全面的仿真研究,比较了不同审查方案估计的准确性和效率。此外,通过对两个真实世界数据集的分析证明了所提出方法的适用性,强调了其在可靠性领域的实际效用。最后,考虑a -最优性、d -最优性和f -最优性三个准则来确定最优的审查方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信