Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights From Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias.
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights From Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias.","authors":"Yoshimitsu Kuwabara, Tatsunori Shiraishi, Ryoko Kato, Shigeru Matsuda, Akiko Sakata, Yumene Kubota, Ryoko Yokote, Kimihiko Nakao, Mirei Yonezawa, Tomoko Ichikawa, Toshiyuki Takeshita, Shunji Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical relevance of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients, using data from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to minimize embryonic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 52 PGT-A cycles (48 patients) with single euploid embryo transfers between April 2020 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (ART failure without RPL, 18 cycles/17 patients), Group B (RPL following ART pregnancies, 12 cycles/10 patients), and Group C (RPL following natural pregnancies, 22 cycles/21 patients). This classification aimed to assess maternal factors contributing to BPL across different clinical backgrounds. The incidence of BPL, clinical pregnancy rate, and predictive performance of ART outcomes were analyzed, with and without BPL included, using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biochemical pregnancy loss occurred in 0% (A), 25.0% (B), and 37.5% (C) of patients (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Incorporating BPL into miscarriage history significantly improved ART outcome prediction (AUC 0.871 vs. 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biochemical pregnancy loss after euploid embryo transfer likely reflects maternal or endometrial pathology. Incorporating BPL into the diagnostic criteria for RPL may enhance clinical assessment and personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"24 1","pages":"e12668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical relevance of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients, using data from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to minimize embryonic factors.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 52 PGT-A cycles (48 patients) with single euploid embryo transfers between April 2020 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (ART failure without RPL, 18 cycles/17 patients), Group B (RPL following ART pregnancies, 12 cycles/10 patients), and Group C (RPL following natural pregnancies, 22 cycles/21 patients). This classification aimed to assess maternal factors contributing to BPL across different clinical backgrounds. The incidence of BPL, clinical pregnancy rate, and predictive performance of ART outcomes were analyzed, with and without BPL included, using ROC curve analysis.
Results: Biochemical pregnancy loss occurred in 0% (A), 25.0% (B), and 37.5% (C) of patients (p = 0.037). Incorporating BPL into miscarriage history significantly improved ART outcome prediction (AUC 0.871 vs. 0.759).
Conclusion: Biochemical pregnancy loss after euploid embryo transfer likely reflects maternal or endometrial pathology. Incorporating BPL into the diagnostic criteria for RPL may enhance clinical assessment and personalized care.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.