Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights From Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive Medicine and Biology Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/rmb2.12668
Yoshimitsu Kuwabara, Tatsunori Shiraishi, Ryoko Kato, Shigeru Matsuda, Akiko Sakata, Yumene Kubota, Ryoko Yokote, Kimihiko Nakao, Mirei Yonezawa, Tomoko Ichikawa, Toshiyuki Takeshita, Shunji Suzuki
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Biochemical Pregnancy Loss in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Patients: Insights From Euploid Embryo Transfers Minimizing Embryonic Bias.","authors":"Yoshimitsu Kuwabara, Tatsunori Shiraishi, Ryoko Kato, Shigeru Matsuda, Akiko Sakata, Yumene Kubota, Ryoko Yokote, Kimihiko Nakao, Mirei Yonezawa, Tomoko Ichikawa, Toshiyuki Takeshita, Shunji Suzuki","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical relevance of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients, using data from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to minimize embryonic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 52 PGT-A cycles (48 patients) with single euploid embryo transfers between April 2020 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (ART failure without RPL, 18 cycles/17 patients), Group B (RPL following ART pregnancies, 12 cycles/10 patients), and Group C (RPL following natural pregnancies, 22 cycles/21 patients). This classification aimed to assess maternal factors contributing to BPL across different clinical backgrounds. The incidence of BPL, clinical pregnancy rate, and predictive performance of ART outcomes were analyzed, with and without BPL included, using ROC curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Biochemical pregnancy loss occurred in 0% (A), 25.0% (B), and 37.5% (C) of patients (<i>p</i> = 0.037). Incorporating BPL into miscarriage history significantly improved ART outcome prediction (AUC 0.871 vs. 0.759).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biochemical pregnancy loss after euploid embryo transfer likely reflects maternal or endometrial pathology. Incorporating BPL into the diagnostic criteria for RPL may enhance clinical assessment and personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"24 1","pages":"e12668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12284377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical relevance of biochemical pregnancy loss (BPL) in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients, using data from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) to minimize embryonic factors.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 52 PGT-A cycles (48 patients) with single euploid embryo transfers between April 2020 and December 2022. Patients were stratified into three groups: Group A (ART failure without RPL, 18 cycles/17 patients), Group B (RPL following ART pregnancies, 12 cycles/10 patients), and Group C (RPL following natural pregnancies, 22 cycles/21 patients). This classification aimed to assess maternal factors contributing to BPL across different clinical backgrounds. The incidence of BPL, clinical pregnancy rate, and predictive performance of ART outcomes were analyzed, with and without BPL included, using ROC curve analysis.

Results: Biochemical pregnancy loss occurred in 0% (A), 25.0% (B), and 37.5% (C) of patients (p = 0.037). Incorporating BPL into miscarriage history significantly improved ART outcome prediction (AUC 0.871 vs. 0.759).

Conclusion: Biochemical pregnancy loss after euploid embryo transfer likely reflects maternal or endometrial pathology. Incorporating BPL into the diagnostic criteria for RPL may enhance clinical assessment and personalized care.

生化妊娠丢失在复发性妊娠丢失患者中的临床意义:来自整倍体胚胎移植最小化胚胎偏差的见解。
目的:利用胚胎植入前非整倍体基因检测(PGT-A)数据,评估生化妊娠丢失(BPL)与复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)患者的临床相关性。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括2020年4月至2022年12月间进行单整倍体胚胎移植的52个PGT-A周期(48例患者)。患者分为三组:A组(ART失败无RPL, 18个周期/17例),B组(ART妊娠后RPL, 12个周期/10例),C组(自然妊娠后RPL, 22个周期/21例)。本分类旨在评估不同临床背景的产妇因素对BPL的影响。采用ROC曲线分析BPL的发生率、临床妊娠率和ART预后的预测性能,包括是否包括BPL。结果:0% (A)、25.0% (B)、37.5% (C)的患者发生生化性妊娠丢失(p = 0.037)。将BPL纳入流产史可显著提高ART预后预测(AUC为0.871比0.759)。结论:整倍体胚胎移植后的生化妊娠丢失可能反映了母体或子宫内膜病理。将BPL纳入RPL的诊断标准可以提高临床评估和个性化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信