Double-Axis Maxillary Skeletal Expander Suggests Higher Expansion Efficiency in Early Activation: A Finite Element Analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kaviya Kanokpongsak, Prajak Jariyapongpaiboon, Sorapon Na Lampang, Phetcharat Dhammayannarangsi, Nicha Ungvijanpunya, Thanaphum Osathanon, Pornchai Jansisyanont, Nuttapol Limjeerajarus, Chalida Nakalekha Limjeerajarus
{"title":"Double-Axis Maxillary Skeletal Expander Suggests Higher Expansion Efficiency in Early Activation: A Finite Element Analysis.","authors":"Kaviya Kanokpongsak, Prajak Jariyapongpaiboon, Sorapon Na Lampang, Phetcharat Dhammayannarangsi, Nicha Ungvijanpunya, Thanaphum Osathanon, Pornchai Jansisyanont, Nuttapol Limjeerajarus, Chalida Nakalekha Limjeerajarus","doi":"10.1111/ocr.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conventional single-axis maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) have some drawbacks, such as limited control over maxillary expansion and possible asymmetric expansion between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS). This report introduces a double-axis maxillary skeletal expander (DAMSE) concept to overcome these drawbacks and enhance the efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Five different DAMSE designs were compared with a conventional single-axis MSE. Finite element analysis was performed to analyse their expansion efficiency, stress magnitude and distribution occurring in a simplified bone model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DAMSE outperformed the single-axis MSE and provided better control over ANS and PNS expansion. During early activation, the highest expansion efficiency (31.7%) was achieved by DAMSE Model V, 13% more efficient than the single-axis MSE. This efficiency was increased to 100.8% by combining the DAMSE Model V with midpalatal suture surgery. However, with the simplified bone model, the current study could not demonstrate that DAMSE can resolve the issue of asymmetric expansion between ANS and PNS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An appropriately designed DAMSE can be a promising tool for maxillary expansion treatment. DAMSE offers more efficient treatment than the conventional single-axis MSE while maintaining similar levels of patient comfort and invasiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional single-axis maxillary skeletal expanders (MSE) have some drawbacks, such as limited control over maxillary expansion and possible asymmetric expansion between the anterior nasal spine (ANS) and posterior nasal spine (PNS). This report introduces a double-axis maxillary skeletal expander (DAMSE) concept to overcome these drawbacks and enhance the efficiency of maxillary skeletal expansion.

Materials and methods: Five different DAMSE designs were compared with a conventional single-axis MSE. Finite element analysis was performed to analyse their expansion efficiency, stress magnitude and distribution occurring in a simplified bone model.

Results: DAMSE outperformed the single-axis MSE and provided better control over ANS and PNS expansion. During early activation, the highest expansion efficiency (31.7%) was achieved by DAMSE Model V, 13% more efficient than the single-axis MSE. This efficiency was increased to 100.8% by combining the DAMSE Model V with midpalatal suture surgery. However, with the simplified bone model, the current study could not demonstrate that DAMSE can resolve the issue of asymmetric expansion between ANS and PNS.

Conclusions: An appropriately designed DAMSE can be a promising tool for maxillary expansion treatment. DAMSE offers more efficient treatment than the conventional single-axis MSE while maintaining similar levels of patient comfort and invasiveness.

双轴上颌骨骼扩展器在早期激活时具有较高的扩展效率:有限元分析。
传统的单轴上颌骨扩张器(MSE)存在上颌扩张控制受限、鼻前棘(ANS)和鼻后棘(PNS)可能出现不对称扩张等缺点。本文介绍了一种双轴上颌骨扩展器(DAMSE)的概念,以克服这些缺点,提高上颌骨扩展效率。材料与方法:比较五种不同设计的单轴MSE。通过有限元分析,分析了它们在简化骨模型中的扩展效率、应力大小和分布。结果:DAMSE优于单轴MSE,对ANS和PNS扩展有更好的控制。在早期激活时,DAMSE模型V的扩展效率最高(31.7%),比单轴MSE效率高13%。DAMSE V型与中腭缝合手术相结合,效率提高到100.8%。然而,在简化骨模型的情况下,本研究无法证明DAMSE可以解决ANS和PNS之间不对称扩张的问题。结论:适当设计的DAMSE是上颌扩张治疗的理想工具。DAMSE比传统的单轴MSE提供更有效的治疗,同时保持相似的患者舒适度和侵入性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信