Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Pre-hospital Stage of Acute Stroke in Korea II : Transport Decisions for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jae Sang Oh, Yuna Jo, Jong Min Lee, Hong Suk Ahn, Jung-Jae Kim, Kyoung Min Jang, Gi-Yong Yun, Jang Hun Kim, Dongwook Seo, Hyeong Jin Lee, Jinwoo Jeong, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Yong Soo Cho, Su Jin Kim, Jongkyu Park, Won-Sang Cho, Hoon Kim, Young Woo Kim, Seung Hun Sheen, Sang Weon Lee, Jae Whan Lee, Tae Gon Kim, Sung-Kon Ha, Sukh Que Park, Soon Chan Kwon
{"title":"Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Pre-hospital Stage of Acute Stroke in Korea II : Transport Decisions for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.","authors":"Jae Sang Oh, Yuna Jo, Jong Min Lee, Hong Suk Ahn, Jung-Jae Kim, Kyoung Min Jang, Gi-Yong Yun, Jang Hun Kim, Dongwook Seo, Hyeong Jin Lee, Jinwoo Jeong, Kyoung-Chul Cha, Yong Soo Cho, Su Jin Kim, Jongkyu Park, Won-Sang Cho, Hoon Kim, Young Woo Kim, Seung Hun Sheen, Sang Weon Lee, Jae Whan Lee, Tae Gon Kim, Sung-Kon Ha, Sukh Que Park, Soon Chan Kwon","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2025.0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mothership (MS) model, where patients are directly transferred to a thrombectomy-capable center, and the drip-and-ship (DS) model, where thrombolysis is initiated at the nearest primary stroke center before transfer for thrombectomy, are the primary transport modes for patients with stroke. We aimed to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate transfer strategy based on emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer three Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions comparing MS and DS models. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcomes, mortality, and successful recanalization. Twenty-six non-randomized controlled studies showed that the MS model improved good functional outcomes by approximately 14% compared with the DS model (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.30). Fifteen studies reported that mortality in the MS and DS models showed no significant differences (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11). Twenty-four studies revealed no significant difference in successful recanalization between the MS and DS models (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68-1.10). The MS model should be considered first to improve the functional outcome of patients with LVO. However, if thrombectomy cannot be performed immediately after thrombolysis, or if a thrombectomy-enabled hospital is not nearby, the DS model should be considered by stroke specialists depending on transportation time and regional factors. We suggest a mixed approach with the DS model based on specific circumstances or regions to ensure the optimum treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Appropriate transport for patients with LVO improves the prognosis of AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2025.0103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mothership (MS) model, where patients are directly transferred to a thrombectomy-capable center, and the drip-and-ship (DS) model, where thrombolysis is initiated at the nearest primary stroke center before transfer for thrombectomy, are the primary transport modes for patients with stroke. We aimed to establish guidelines for selecting the appropriate transfer strategy based on emergent large vessel occlusion (LVO). We developed this guideline based on evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses via a de novo process. A systematic literature review was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and KoreaMed) to answer three Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions comparing MS and DS models. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagrams and meta-analyses were generated for functional outcomes, mortality, and successful recanalization. Twenty-six non-randomized controlled studies showed that the MS model improved good functional outcomes by approximately 14% compared with the DS model (odds ratio [OR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.30). Fifteen studies reported that mortality in the MS and DS models showed no significant differences (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11). Twenty-four studies revealed no significant difference in successful recanalization between the MS and DS models (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68-1.10). The MS model should be considered first to improve the functional outcome of patients with LVO. However, if thrombectomy cannot be performed immediately after thrombolysis, or if a thrombectomy-enabled hospital is not nearby, the DS model should be considered by stroke specialists depending on transportation time and regional factors. We suggest a mixed approach with the DS model based on specific circumstances or regions to ensure the optimum treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Appropriate transport for patients with LVO improves the prognosis of AIS.

韩国急性脑卒中院前阶段临床实践指南II:急性缺血性脑卒中患者的转运决策
母船模式(MS)和船滴模式(DS)是卒中患者的主要运输模式,前者将患者直接转移到具有取栓能力的中心,后者在最近的原发性卒中中心开始溶栓,然后转移到取栓中心。我们旨在建立基于紧急大血管闭塞(LVO)选择合适转移策略的指南。我们通过从头开始的过程,根据系统评价和荟萃分析的证据制定了本指南。对四个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane和KoreaMed)进行了系统的文献回顾,以回答三个人口、干预、比较和结果问题,比较MS和DS模型。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目生成了功能结果、死亡率和成功再通的流程图和荟萃分析。26项非随机对照研究表明,与DS模型相比,MS模型改善了约14%的良好功能预后(优势比[OR], 1.14;95%置信区间[CI], 1.00-1.30)。15项研究报告MS和DS模型的死亡率无显著差异(OR, 0.97;95% ci, 0.84-1.11)。24项研究显示MS和DS模型在成功再通方面无显著差异(OR, 0.87;95% ci, 0.68-1.10)。首先应该考虑MS模型来改善LVO患者的功能预后。然而,如果溶栓后不能立即取栓,或者附近没有可以取栓的医院,中风专家应根据交通时间和区域因素考虑DS模型。我们建议基于特定情况或区域的混合方法与DS模型相结合,以确保急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的最佳治疗。对LVO患者进行适当的转运可改善AIS的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信