How accurate are riders in assessing saddle position?

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
M. Douglas , J. Williams , H. Randle
{"title":"How accurate are riders in assessing saddle position?","authors":"M. Douglas ,&nbsp;J. Williams ,&nbsp;H. Randle","doi":"10.1016/j.jevs.2025.105655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Recent research has highlighted the detrimental impact of an ill-fitting saddle on equine health, welfare and performance. A correctly fitting saddle may not fit if positioned incorrectly.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study assessed riders’ ability to visually evaluate saddle position and examine factors that influenced accuracy of assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Survey participants were provided with photographs of a series of saddles on horses obtained from the lateral aspect of the left side of the horse. Saddles were either correctly positioned (<em>n</em> = 5), too far forward (<em>n</em> = 5) or too far back (<em>n</em> = 2). This was independently confirmed by three accredited saddle fitting professionals. The survey was distributed via snowball sampling on social media over an 3-week period in 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 401 participants, who, on average, correctly identified 58.25 % of the saddle positions. Riders’ ability to correctly assess saddle position (mean 58.25 % correct) was not related to rider age, experience and discipline (all Kruskal-Wallis tests <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). However, participants who had previously had their own saddle fitted professionally were better able to correctly assess saddle position (60.8 ± 19.0 % correct) compared to those who had not (52.2 ± 19.0 %; KW (1) = 12.59, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Given a substantial proportion of riders in this study were unable to identify correct saddle position these results are concerning due to a likely increased risk of causing the horse discomfort and compromising welfare. Given the increasing focus on ethical and sustainable equitation practice, this lack of knowledge regarding a fundamental piece of horse-riding equipment must be addressed as a priority.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 105655"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0737080625003132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Recent research has highlighted the detrimental impact of an ill-fitting saddle on equine health, welfare and performance. A correctly fitting saddle may not fit if positioned incorrectly.

Aims

This study assessed riders’ ability to visually evaluate saddle position and examine factors that influenced accuracy of assessment.

Methods

Survey participants were provided with photographs of a series of saddles on horses obtained from the lateral aspect of the left side of the horse. Saddles were either correctly positioned (n = 5), too far forward (n = 5) or too far back (n = 2). This was independently confirmed by three accredited saddle fitting professionals. The survey was distributed via snowball sampling on social media over an 3-week period in 2021.

Results

There were 401 participants, who, on average, correctly identified 58.25 % of the saddle positions. Riders’ ability to correctly assess saddle position (mean 58.25 % correct) was not related to rider age, experience and discipline (all Kruskal-Wallis tests P > 0.05). However, participants who had previously had their own saddle fitted professionally were better able to correctly assess saddle position (60.8 ± 19.0 % correct) compared to those who had not (52.2 ± 19.0 %; KW (1) = 12.59, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Given a substantial proportion of riders in this study were unable to identify correct saddle position these results are concerning due to a likely increased risk of causing the horse discomfort and compromising welfare. Given the increasing focus on ethical and sustainable equitation practice, this lack of knowledge regarding a fundamental piece of horse-riding equipment must be addressed as a priority.
骑手对马鞍位置的判断有多准确?
背景:最近的研究强调了一个不合适的马鞍对马的健康,福利和性能的不利影响。如果位置不正确,一个正确的鞍座可能不合适。目的:本研究评估骑手对鞍位的视觉评估能力,并探讨影响评估准确性的因素。方法:向调查参与者提供了从马左侧侧面获得的一系列马鞍的照片。马鞍位置正确(n=5),太靠前(n=5)或太靠后(n=2)。这是由三名认可的马鞍安装专业人员独立确认的。该调查于2021年在社交媒体上以滚雪球抽样的方式进行,为期三周。结果:共有401名参与者,平均正确识别出58.25%的马鞍位置。骑手正确评估马鞍位置的能力(平均58.25%的正确率)与骑手的年龄、经验和纪律无关(所有Kruskal-Wallis检验P < 0.05)。然而,先前专业安装过马鞍的参与者能够更好地正确评估马鞍位置(60.8±19.0%正确率),而没有安装马鞍的参与者(52.2±19.0%;Kw(1) = 12.59,p < 0.001)。结论:考虑到本研究中相当大比例的骑手无法识别正确的马鞍位置,这些结果令人担忧,因为这可能会增加导致马匹不适和损害福利的风险。鉴于对道德和可持续马术实践的日益关注,必须优先解决关于骑马基本装备知识缺乏的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
249
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Equine Veterinary Science (JEVS) is an international publication designed for the practicing equine veterinarian, equine researcher, and other equine health care specialist. Published monthly, each issue of JEVS includes original research, reviews, case reports, short communications, and clinical techniques from leaders in the equine veterinary field, covering such topics as laminitis, reproduction, infectious disease, parasitology, behavior, podology, internal medicine, surgery and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信