The discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to detect dysphagia and aspiration according to the stage of Alzheimer's disease.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Serkan Bengisu, Merve Savaş, Demet Aygün Üstel, Senanur Kahraman Beğen, Burak Manay
{"title":"The discriminant ability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 to detect dysphagia and aspiration according to the stage of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Serkan Bengisu, Merve Savaş, Demet Aygün Üstel, Senanur Kahraman Beğen, Burak Manay","doi":"10.1177/13872877251362229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder frequently associated with dysphagia, leading to malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is widely used for dysphagia screening; however, its reliability in advanced AD, where cognitive impairments hinder self-reporting, remains uncertain.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EAT-10 in detecting dysphagia and aspiration across different AD stages.MethodsThe study included 30 AD patients classified into mild, moderate, and advanced stages based on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. Dysphagia was assessed using EAT-10 and validated through Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (p < 0.05).ResultsEAT-10 scores significantly differed across AD stages (p = 0.001), with mean scores of 3.11 ± 1.17 (mild), 11.70 ± 4.64 (moderate), and 18.00 ± 6.90 (advanced). Unsafe swallowing and aspiration were observed in 43.3% and 23.3% of patients, respectively, with higher prevalence in advanced AD. ROC analysis determined an EAT-10 cut-off score of 15 for unsafe swallowing (AUC: 0.96, sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 77%) and 18 for aspiration (AUC: 0.81, sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 75%). Strong correlations were found between EAT-10 and PAS scores (r = 0.812, p < 0.001).ConclusionsEAT-10 is an effective screening tool for dysphagia and aspiration risk in early and moderate AD stages. However, in advanced AD, objective assessments like VFSS remain essential to complement EAT-10 results. Integrating EAT-10 into routine evaluations may enhance early detection, enabling timely interventions and improved clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251362229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251362229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder frequently associated with dysphagia, leading to malnutrition, dehydration, and aspiration pneumonia. The Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) is widely used for dysphagia screening; however, its reliability in advanced AD, where cognitive impairments hinder self-reporting, remains uncertain.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EAT-10 in detecting dysphagia and aspiration across different AD stages.MethodsThe study included 30 AD patients classified into mild, moderate, and advanced stages based on Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scores. Dysphagia was assessed using EAT-10 and validated through Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (p < 0.05).ResultsEAT-10 scores significantly differed across AD stages (p = 0.001), with mean scores of 3.11 ± 1.17 (mild), 11.70 ± 4.64 (moderate), and 18.00 ± 6.90 (advanced). Unsafe swallowing and aspiration were observed in 43.3% and 23.3% of patients, respectively, with higher prevalence in advanced AD. ROC analysis determined an EAT-10 cut-off score of 15 for unsafe swallowing (AUC: 0.96, sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 77%) and 18 for aspiration (AUC: 0.81, sensitivity: 81.2%, specificity: 75%). Strong correlations were found between EAT-10 and PAS scores (r = 0.812, p < 0.001).ConclusionsEAT-10 is an effective screening tool for dysphagia and aspiration risk in early and moderate AD stages. However, in advanced AD, objective assessments like VFSS remain essential to complement EAT-10 results. Integrating EAT-10 into routine evaluations may enhance early detection, enabling timely interventions and improved clinical outcomes.

进食评估工具-10根据阿尔茨海默病分期检测吞咽困难和误吸的判别能力。
阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,常伴有吞咽困难,导致营养不良、脱水和吸入性肺炎。进食评估工具-10 (EAT-10)被广泛用于吞咽困难筛查;然而,在认知障碍阻碍自我报告的晚期AD中,其可靠性仍不确定。目的评价EAT-10在不同AD分期中对吞咽困难和误吸的诊断准确性。方法根据临床痴呆评分(CDR)将30例AD患者分为轻度、中度和晚期。使用EAT-10评估吞咽困难,并通过视频透视吞咽研究(VFSS)和渗透-吸入量表(PAS)进行验证。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U检验、Spearman相关和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析(p . 2)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信