Associations between blood-based neurodegenerative biomarkers and cognitive functioning and decline in India.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Emma Nichols, Jinkook Lee, Alden L Gross, Masroor Anwar, Abhishek Gupta, Eileen M Crimmins, Bharat Thyagarajan, Sharmistha Dey
{"title":"Associations between blood-based neurodegenerative biomarkers and cognitive functioning and decline in India.","authors":"Emma Nichols, Jinkook Lee, Alden L Gross, Masroor Anwar, Abhishek Gupta, Eileen M Crimmins, Bharat Thyagarajan, Sharmistha Dey","doi":"10.1177/13872877251361934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMounting evidence supports the use of blood-based neurodegenerative biomarkers as a low-cost, minimally invasive tool for studying Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, but existing data largely come from clinical samples or high-income settings. Despite emphasis in the literature on the importance of understanding the utility of neurodegenerative biomarkers in diverse populations, published analyses are limited.ObjectiveTo assess the utility of neurodegenerative biomarkers in India by quantifying associations between biomarkers and cognitive outcomes in a nationally representative cohort study.MethodsWe quantified associations between five neurodegenerative blood biomarkers (amyloid-β 42/40 (Aβ<sub>42/40</sub>), total tau, phosphorylated Tau181 (pTau-181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL)) and cross-sectional and longitudinal cognitive outcomes using nationally-representative data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (N = 4096).ResultsWe observed associations between biomarkers and cross-sectional cognitive functioning (Aβ<sub>42/40</sub>, GFAP, and NfL) and longitudinal cognitive change (pTau-181 and NfL). NfL had the strongest associations; each SD increase in log NfL was associated with 0.007 (95% CI 0.000 to 0.014) SD unit/year worse cognitive decline, equivalent to about 35% of the mean longitudinal decline in the sample. We saw little evidence of effect modification by demographic variables or <i>APOE</i> ε4 status.ConclusionsNeurodegenerative biomarkers were associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes as well as mortality, though there was variation in outcome-specific findings across biomarkers. Findings generally support the use of neurodegenerative biomarkers in India. Future research in India should leverage these biomarkers to address a range of research topics, including heterogeneity in dementia phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251361934"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251361934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMounting evidence supports the use of blood-based neurodegenerative biomarkers as a low-cost, minimally invasive tool for studying Alzheimer's disease and other dementias, but existing data largely come from clinical samples or high-income settings. Despite emphasis in the literature on the importance of understanding the utility of neurodegenerative biomarkers in diverse populations, published analyses are limited.ObjectiveTo assess the utility of neurodegenerative biomarkers in India by quantifying associations between biomarkers and cognitive outcomes in a nationally representative cohort study.MethodsWe quantified associations between five neurodegenerative blood biomarkers (amyloid-β 42/40 (Aβ42/40), total tau, phosphorylated Tau181 (pTau-181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light (NfL)) and cross-sectional and longitudinal cognitive outcomes using nationally-representative data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (N = 4096).ResultsWe observed associations between biomarkers and cross-sectional cognitive functioning (Aβ42/40, GFAP, and NfL) and longitudinal cognitive change (pTau-181 and NfL). NfL had the strongest associations; each SD increase in log NfL was associated with 0.007 (95% CI 0.000 to 0.014) SD unit/year worse cognitive decline, equivalent to about 35% of the mean longitudinal decline in the sample. We saw little evidence of effect modification by demographic variables or APOE ε4 status.ConclusionsNeurodegenerative biomarkers were associated with cross-sectional and longitudinal outcomes as well as mortality, though there was variation in outcome-specific findings across biomarkers. Findings generally support the use of neurodegenerative biomarkers in India. Future research in India should leverage these biomarkers to address a range of research topics, including heterogeneity in dementia phenotypes.

基于血液的神经退行性生物标志物与印度认知功能和衰退之间的关系。
越来越多的证据支持使用基于血液的神经退行性生物标志物作为研究阿尔茨海默病和其他痴呆症的低成本、微创工具,但现有数据主要来自临床样本或高收入环境。尽管文献强调理解神经退行性生物标志物在不同人群中的效用的重要性,但发表的分析是有限的。目的在一项具有全国代表性的队列研究中,通过量化生物标志物与认知结果之间的关联,评估印度神经退行性生物标志物的效用。方法:我们量化了5种神经退行性血液生物标志物(淀粉样蛋白-β 42/40 (Aβ42/40)、总tau蛋白、磷酸化Tau181 (pTau-181)、胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、神经丝光(NfL))与横断面和纵向认知结果之间的关系,使用了印度纵向衰老研究(N = 4096)的全国代表性数据。结果我们观察到生物标志物与横断面认知功能(Aβ42/40、GFAP和NfL)和纵向认知变化(pTau-181和NfL)之间的关联。NfL的相关性最强;log NfL每增加一个SD,认知能力下降加重0.007 (95% CI 0.000 ~ 0.014)个SD单位/年,相当于样本纵向平均下降的35%左右。我们几乎没有看到人口统计学变量或APOE ε4状态改变效果的证据。结论:神经退行性生物标志物与横断面和纵向结果以及死亡率相关,尽管不同生物标志物的结果特异性发现存在差异。研究结果普遍支持在印度使用神经退行性生物标志物。印度未来的研究应该利用这些生物标志物来解决一系列的研究课题,包括痴呆表型的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信