Cost impact of balloon guide catheter with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Analysis from the United States, Canada, and seven European countries.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Levansri Makalanda, Alex Mortimer, Eva Gonzalez-Diaz, Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Shanti Scheffler, Emilie Kottenmeier, Waleed Brinjikji
{"title":"Cost impact of balloon guide catheter with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Analysis from the United States, Canada, and seven European countries.","authors":"Levansri Makalanda, Alex Mortimer, Eva Gonzalez-Diaz, Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Shanti Scheffler, Emilie Kottenmeier, Waleed Brinjikji","doi":"10.1177/15910199251359730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBalloon guide catheters (BGCs) are adjunctive devices that may be used during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to induce flow arrest and improve clot retrieval and reperfusion outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. As the cost-effectiveness of BGC use remains uncertain, this study assessed short- and long-term direct healthcare costs associated with BGC use versus standard guide catheters (SGC) during MT.MethodsA decision tree model estimated the short-term costs (index hospitalization), long-term costs (one year after index hospitalization), and total costs for patients undergoing MT + BGC versus MT + SGC from a healthcare system perspective in the United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Average device costs were sourced from public tender prices and market research data. Weighted average healthcare costs for modified Rankin Scale scores were sourced from published literature for the respective countries. A 2024 meta-analysis supporting improved outcomes with BGC provided input parameters to model treatment effects for BGC and SGC. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of model parameters and accounted for uncertainty.ResultsAcross all countries, long-term and total per-patient costs were lower with MT + BGC, yielding total per-patient cost savings of $6297 (US), CAD 3006 (Canada), £1828 (UK), 28,950 kr (Sweden), €1077 (Germany), €709 (Italy), €3678 (Spain), €2259 (Belgium), and €3344 (The Netherlands). The probability of MT + BGC yielding cost savings ranged 0.356-0.911 (short term), 0.962-0.975 (long term), and 0.838-0.935 (total costs). While long-term and total costs consistently favored MT + BGC, short-term cost savings showed more variability across countries.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that BGC use is associated with total one-year per-patient cost savings for inpatient and postdischarge stroke care across the US, Canada, and seven European healthcare systems. Balloon guide catheters can potentially reduce post-stroke care costs and should be considered more broadly, despite the additional cost incurred by the device.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251359730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251359730","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBalloon guide catheters (BGCs) are adjunctive devices that may be used during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to induce flow arrest and improve clot retrieval and reperfusion outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. As the cost-effectiveness of BGC use remains uncertain, this study assessed short- and long-term direct healthcare costs associated with BGC use versus standard guide catheters (SGC) during MT.MethodsA decision tree model estimated the short-term costs (index hospitalization), long-term costs (one year after index hospitalization), and total costs for patients undergoing MT + BGC versus MT + SGC from a healthcare system perspective in the United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Average device costs were sourced from public tender prices and market research data. Weighted average healthcare costs for modified Rankin Scale scores were sourced from published literature for the respective countries. A 2024 meta-analysis supporting improved outcomes with BGC provided input parameters to model treatment effects for BGC and SGC. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of model parameters and accounted for uncertainty.ResultsAcross all countries, long-term and total per-patient costs were lower with MT + BGC, yielding total per-patient cost savings of $6297 (US), CAD 3006 (Canada), £1828 (UK), 28,950 kr (Sweden), €1077 (Germany), €709 (Italy), €3678 (Spain), €2259 (Belgium), and €3344 (The Netherlands). The probability of MT + BGC yielding cost savings ranged 0.356-0.911 (short term), 0.962-0.975 (long term), and 0.838-0.935 (total costs). While long-term and total costs consistently favored MT + BGC, short-term cost savings showed more variability across countries.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that BGC use is associated with total one-year per-patient cost savings for inpatient and postdischarge stroke care across the US, Canada, and seven European healthcare systems. Balloon guide catheters can potentially reduce post-stroke care costs and should be considered more broadly, despite the additional cost incurred by the device.

球囊导尿管联合机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的成本影响:来自美国、加拿大和七个欧洲国家的分析
背景球囊导尿管(bgc)是一种辅助装置,可用于机械取栓(MT)过程中诱导血流停止,改善急性缺血性卒中的凝块恢复和再灌注结果。由于BGC使用的成本效益仍不确定,本研究评估了MT期间使用BGC与标准导尿管(SGC)相关的短期和长期直接医疗成本。方法决策树模型从医疗保健系统的角度估计了MT + BGC与MT + SGC患者的短期成本(指数住院)、长期成本(指数住院后一年)和总成本。德国,意大利,西班牙,比利时和荷兰。平均设备成本来源于公开招标价格和市场研究数据。修正兰金量表得分的加权平均医疗费用来源于各自国家的已发表文献。一项支持BGC改善预后的2024年荟萃分析为BGC和SGC的治疗效果模型提供了输入参数。确定性的单向和概率敏感性分析评估了模型参数的稳健性,并考虑了不确定性。结果在所有国家,MT + BGC的长期和总每位患者成本较低,每位患者总成本节省6297美元(美国)、3006加元(加拿大)、1828英镑(英国)、28950克朗(瑞典)、1077欧元(德国)、709欧元(意大利)、3678欧元(西班牙)、2259欧元(比利时)和3344欧元(荷兰)。MT + BGC的成本节约概率范围为0.356-0.911(短期),0.962-0.975(长期)和0.838-0.935(总成本)。虽然长期成本和总成本一直有利于MT + BGC,但短期成本节约在不同国家表现出更大的差异。结论:本研究表明,在美国、加拿大和七个欧洲医疗保健系统中,BGC的使用与住院和出院后卒中护理中每例患者一年的总成本节约有关。气囊导尿管可以潜在地减少中风后的护理费用,应该更广泛地考虑,尽管该设备会产生额外的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信