Conceptualization of gender in published malaria and gender research: a systematic descriptive review.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Deborah Atobrah, Benjamin K Kwansa, Patience G Okyere-Asante, Abena Kyere, Delali M Badasu, Irene A Kretchy
{"title":"Conceptualization of gender in published malaria and gender research: a systematic descriptive review.","authors":"Deborah Atobrah, Benjamin K Kwansa, Patience G Okyere-Asante, Abena Kyere, Delali M Badasu, Irene A Kretchy","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02545-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malaria disproportionately affects vulnerable and marginalised population subgroups, including women and girls, migrants, and persons with disabilities. Gender roles expose men and women differently to malaria risks. Similarly, restrictive gender norms pose unique challenges to women and girls in accessing preventive treatment and care. Gender norms that perpetuate hegemonic masculinity also expose men and boys to malaria, resulting from occupational exposure and untimely access to malaria treatment and care. Unfortunately, the gender dimensions of malaria remain under-researched. This systematic descriptive review examines how gender has been conceptualised in published malaria and gender research over the last three decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The keywords \"malaria AND gender\" were used to search for articles published in English from 1995 to 2024 in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was adopted for this review. The Rayyan intelligent systematic review software was used to collate, manage, and screen articles retrieved from the search engines. The gender analysis matrix advanced by Morgan and colleagues was used to analyse the conceptualisation of gender in published malaria and gender research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 57 published articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final review. We found that the majority of the published papers on malaria and gender have been biomedical in nature, consequently reducing gender analysis to only sex-disaggregated data. Moreover, most of the studies employed a quantitative research approach, with the majority being laboratory-based research, focussing on sub-Saharan Africa.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for more social science research that employs qualitative, mixed-methods, and community-based approaches to malaria and gender research. These approaches extend gender analysis beyond sex and/or gender-disaggregated data, and includes other domains, such as access to resources; distribution of labour; practices and roles; norms, values and beliefs; and decision-making power.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02545-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malaria disproportionately affects vulnerable and marginalised population subgroups, including women and girls, migrants, and persons with disabilities. Gender roles expose men and women differently to malaria risks. Similarly, restrictive gender norms pose unique challenges to women and girls in accessing preventive treatment and care. Gender norms that perpetuate hegemonic masculinity also expose men and boys to malaria, resulting from occupational exposure and untimely access to malaria treatment and care. Unfortunately, the gender dimensions of malaria remain under-researched. This systematic descriptive review examines how gender has been conceptualised in published malaria and gender research over the last three decades.

Methods: The keywords "malaria AND gender" were used to search for articles published in English from 1995 to 2024 in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was adopted for this review. The Rayyan intelligent systematic review software was used to collate, manage, and screen articles retrieved from the search engines. The gender analysis matrix advanced by Morgan and colleagues was used to analyse the conceptualisation of gender in published malaria and gender research.

Results: A total of 57 published articles that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final review. We found that the majority of the published papers on malaria and gender have been biomedical in nature, consequently reducing gender analysis to only sex-disaggregated data. Moreover, most of the studies employed a quantitative research approach, with the majority being laboratory-based research, focussing on sub-Saharan Africa.

Conclusion: There is a need for more social science research that employs qualitative, mixed-methods, and community-based approaches to malaria and gender research. These approaches extend gender analysis beyond sex and/or gender-disaggregated data, and includes other domains, such as access to resources; distribution of labour; practices and roles; norms, values and beliefs; and decision-making power.

已发表的疟疾和性别研究中的性别概念化:系统的描述性综述。
背景:疟疾对脆弱和边缘化人群的影响尤为严重,包括妇女和女孩、移民和残疾人。性别角色使男性和女性面临不同的疟疾风险。同样,限制性的性别规范对妇女和女孩在获得预防性治疗和护理方面构成了独特的挑战。使霸道男子气概永久化的性别规范也使男子和男孩容易感染疟疾,这是由于职业接触和无法及时获得疟疾治疗和护理造成的。不幸的是,疟疾的性别层面仍未得到充分研究。本系统的描述性综述审查了过去三十年来已发表的疟疾和性别研究中如何将性别概念化。方法:以“malaria AND gender”为关键词,在PubMed、Scopus、Science Direct和谷歌Scholar 4个数据库中检索1995 ~ 2024年发表的英文论文。本综述采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)。Rayyan智能系统审查软件用于整理、管理和筛选从搜索引擎检索到的文章。摩根及其同事提出的性别分析矩阵用于分析已发表的疟疾和性别研究中的性别概念。结果:共有57篇符合纳入标准的已发表文章被纳入终评。我们发现,大多数发表的关于疟疾和性别的论文都是生物医学性质的,因此将性别分析减少到仅按性别分类的数据。此外,大多数研究采用了定量研究方法,其中大多数是基于实验室的研究,重点是撒哈拉以南非洲。结论:需要更多的社会科学研究,采用定性、混合方法和基于社区的方法进行疟疾和性别研究。这些方法将性别分析扩展到性别和/或按性别分类的数据之外,并包括其他领域,例如获取资源;劳动分配;实践和角色;规范、价值观和信仰;以及决策权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信