How do World Health Organization technical officers working on noncommunicable diseases approach health equity?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michelle Amri, Khadija Rashid, Makda Habtegergesa, Jesse B Bump
{"title":"How do World Health Organization technical officers working on noncommunicable diseases approach health equity?","authors":"Michelle Amri, Khadija Rashid, Makda Habtegergesa, Jesse B Bump","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02552-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health equity has become a common objective in both global and public health. Although there has been recent scholarship to critically examine how this concept has been applied by the World Health Organization (WHO), there has not been any detailed investigation into the WHO's work on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the approaches taken by WHO technical officers working on NCDs to address health equity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The perspectives of technical officers working on NCDs at the WHO were collated through semi-structured key informant interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim to facilitate data analysis by two independent reviewers in NVivo 14.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Key informants felt: a disconnect between NCDs programmatic efforts and health equity; that equity in health primarily involves ensuring equitable access to healthcare, with an emphasis on addressing financial hardship; and that equity in health entails targeting those who are most 'vulnerable'. In investigating how health equity is being applied in NCD efforts, it was apparent that a consideration of health equity is missing in program implementation and policy design, and that donors' goals supersede long-term prevention efforts. Lastly, in pinpointing concrete changes or results seen around how health equity is operationalized in NCDs efforts, several success stories from various regions emerge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that WHO technical officers working on NCDs often possessed a limited understanding of health equity that resulted in little meaningful action to embed health equity considerations into programmatic and policy work. Evidently, WHO technical officers need to better navigate or contest industry interference and learn more about health equity as a concept and the links to NCDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"210"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02552-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health equity has become a common objective in both global and public health. Although there has been recent scholarship to critically examine how this concept has been applied by the World Health Organization (WHO), there has not been any detailed investigation into the WHO's work on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the approaches taken by WHO technical officers working on NCDs to address health equity.

Methods: The perspectives of technical officers working on NCDs at the WHO were collated through semi-structured key informant interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim to facilitate data analysis by two independent reviewers in NVivo 14.

Results: Key informants felt: a disconnect between NCDs programmatic efforts and health equity; that equity in health primarily involves ensuring equitable access to healthcare, with an emphasis on addressing financial hardship; and that equity in health entails targeting those who are most 'vulnerable'. In investigating how health equity is being applied in NCD efforts, it was apparent that a consideration of health equity is missing in program implementation and policy design, and that donors' goals supersede long-term prevention efforts. Lastly, in pinpointing concrete changes or results seen around how health equity is operationalized in NCDs efforts, several success stories from various regions emerge.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that WHO technical officers working on NCDs often possessed a limited understanding of health equity that resulted in little meaningful action to embed health equity considerations into programmatic and policy work. Evidently, WHO technical officers need to better navigate or contest industry interference and learn more about health equity as a concept and the links to NCDs.

世界卫生组织从事非传染性疾病工作的技术官员如何处理卫生公平问题?
卫生公平已成为全球和公共卫生领域的共同目标。尽管最近有一些学术研究对世界卫生组织(世卫组织)如何应用这一概念进行了批判性研究,但对世卫组织在非传染性疾病方面的工作尚未进行任何详细调查。本研究旨在通过调查世卫组织从事非传染性疾病工作的技术官员为解决卫生公平问题所采取的方法来填补这一空白。方法:通过半结构化的关键信息提供者访谈,整理世界卫生组织非传染性疾病技术官员的观点。为了便于两位独立审稿人在NVivo 14中进行数据分析,采访被逐字转录。结果:主要举报人认为:非传染性疾病规划工作与卫生公平之间存在脱节;卫生方面的公平主要涉及确保公平获得医疗保健,重点是解决经济困难;卫生方面的公平需要针对那些最“脆弱”的人。在调查如何将卫生公平应用于非传染性疾病工作时,很明显,在规划实施和政策设计中缺少对卫生公平的考虑,捐助者的目标取代了长期预防工作。最后,在确定如何在非传染性疾病工作中落实卫生公平方面所看到的具体变化或结果时,出现了来自不同区域的一些成功故事。结论:本研究的结果表明,从事非传染性疾病工作的世卫组织技术官员往往对卫生公平的理解有限,导致在将卫生公平考虑纳入规划和政策工作方面几乎没有采取有意义的行动。显然,世卫组织技术官员需要更好地驾驭或抵制行业干预,更多地了解卫生公平这一概念及其与非传染性疾病的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信