"This Is How I Give Back": Long-Term Survivors on Legacy and HIV Cure Research at the End of Life-A Qualitative Inquiry in the United States.

IF 2.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ali Ahmed, Jeff Taylor, Whitney Tran, Simran Swaitch, Samuel O Ndukwe, Rachel Lau, Kris H Oliveira, Stephanie Solso, Cheryl Dullano, Andy Kaytes, Patricia K Riggs, Robert Deiss, Sara Gianella, Karine Dubé
{"title":"\"This Is How I Give Back\": Long-Term Survivors on Legacy and HIV Cure Research at the End of Life-A Qualitative Inquiry in the United States.","authors":"Ali Ahmed, Jeff Taylor, Whitney Tran, Simran Swaitch, Samuel O Ndukwe, Rachel Lau, Kris H Oliveira, Stephanie Solso, Cheryl Dullano, Andy Kaytes, Patricia K Riggs, Robert Deiss, Sara Gianella, Karine Dubé","doi":"10.3390/idr17040078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: End-of-life (EOL) HIV cure research, which studies HIV persistence through pre- and post-mortem tissue collection, has focused primarily on people living with HIV (PLWH) with a prognosis of six months or less. However, the perspectives of long-term survivors (LTS) diagnosed before the advent of effective antiretroviral treatment (ART) remain underexplored. Understanding their motivations and concerns about EOL cure research is essential for creating inclusive and ethical research frameworks. <b>Methods</b>: Between 2023 and 2024, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 16 PLWH aged 60 and older from diverse backgrounds across the United States, recruited through community-based organizations and HIV networks. We used inductive thematic analysis to explore LTS' perspectives on EOL HIV research. <b>Results</b>: Participants included cisgender men (56.25%) and women (43.75%) with diverse racial identities. While participants supported EOL HIV cure research, their willingness to participate varied, influenced by awareness, logistics, and ethical concerns. Altruism-motivated participation, but misconceptions about procedures and concerns over bodily integrity represented potential barriers. Some viewed blood draws and leukaphereses as routine, while others expressed hesitancy with biopsies and post-mortem tissue retrieval. HIV stigma, historical mistrust, and cultural beliefs also played a role in willingness to participate. LTS emphasized the need for decentralized research sites, travel support, and financial safeguards. <b>Conclusions</b>: To include LTS in EOL HIV cure research, a community-driven approach is needed, focusing on clear communication, ethical considerations, logistical support, and linkages to EOL care. Addressing misconceptions and building trust, particularly within groups traditionally underrepresented in research, is essential to expanding participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr17040078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: End-of-life (EOL) HIV cure research, which studies HIV persistence through pre- and post-mortem tissue collection, has focused primarily on people living with HIV (PLWH) with a prognosis of six months or less. However, the perspectives of long-term survivors (LTS) diagnosed before the advent of effective antiretroviral treatment (ART) remain underexplored. Understanding their motivations and concerns about EOL cure research is essential for creating inclusive and ethical research frameworks. Methods: Between 2023 and 2024, we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 16 PLWH aged 60 and older from diverse backgrounds across the United States, recruited through community-based organizations and HIV networks. We used inductive thematic analysis to explore LTS' perspectives on EOL HIV research. Results: Participants included cisgender men (56.25%) and women (43.75%) with diverse racial identities. While participants supported EOL HIV cure research, their willingness to participate varied, influenced by awareness, logistics, and ethical concerns. Altruism-motivated participation, but misconceptions about procedures and concerns over bodily integrity represented potential barriers. Some viewed blood draws and leukaphereses as routine, while others expressed hesitancy with biopsies and post-mortem tissue retrieval. HIV stigma, historical mistrust, and cultural beliefs also played a role in willingness to participate. LTS emphasized the need for decentralized research sites, travel support, and financial safeguards. Conclusions: To include LTS in EOL HIV cure research, a community-driven approach is needed, focusing on clear communication, ethical considerations, logistical support, and linkages to EOL care. Addressing misconceptions and building trust, particularly within groups traditionally underrepresented in research, is essential to expanding participation.

“这就是我如何回馈”:长期幸存者的遗产和艾滋病治疗研究在生命的尽头-在美国的定性调查。
背景/目的:生命终结(EOL) HIV治愈研究主要集中在预后为6个月或更短的HIV感染者(PLWH)身上,通过死前和死后组织收集来研究HIV的持久性。然而,在有效的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)出现之前诊断出的长期幸存者(LTS)的前景仍未得到充分探索。了解他们对EOL治疗研究的动机和关注,对于创建包容性和伦理性的研究框架至关重要。方法:在2023年至2024年期间,我们通过社区组织和艾滋病毒网络招募了来自美国各地不同背景的16名60岁及以上的PLWH进行了深入的定性访谈。我们采用归纳主题分析的方法来探讨LTS在EOL HIV研究中的观点。结果:参与者中有不同种族认同的顺性别男性(56.25%)和女性(43.75%)。虽然参与者支持EOL艾滋病治疗研究,但受意识、后勤和伦理问题的影响,他们的参与意愿各不相同。利他主义动机的参与,但对程序的误解和对身体完整性的担忧代表了潜在的障碍。一些人认为抽血和白细胞检查是常规的,而另一些人则对活组织检查和死后组织提取表示犹豫。艾滋病污名、历史上的不信任和文化信仰也在参与意愿方面发挥了作用。LTS强调需要分散的研究地点、旅行支持和财政保障。结论:为了将LTS纳入EOL艾滋病治疗研究,需要采用社区驱动的方法,重点关注明确的沟通、伦理考虑、后勤支持以及与EOL护理的联系。消除误解和建立信任,特别是在传统上在研究中代表性不足的群体中建立信任,对于扩大参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信