Effect of combined colloid preloading and crystalloid coloading versus combined colloid and crystalloid coloading on maternal cardiac output during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section under combined prophylactic noradrenaline infusion.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1421947
Xiang Gao, Yu Huang, Sumei Hu, Chuantao Lin, Yi You, Shihong Huang, Ming Liu, Jianying Yan
{"title":"Effect of combined colloid preloading and crystalloid coloading versus combined colloid and crystalloid coloading on maternal cardiac output during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section under combined prophylactic noradrenaline infusion.","authors":"Xiang Gao, Yu Huang, Sumei Hu, Chuantao Lin, Yi You, Shihong Huang, Ming Liu, Jianying Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1421947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypotension is a common complication of spinal anesthesia during cesarean section, and no single intervention has been shown to eliminate maternal hypotension. Fluid loading strategies combined with vasopressor drug regimens can achieve this goal by maximizing cardiac output (CO) and minimizing the fall in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). However, the optimal fluid volume, type, and timing of administration have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to use Vigileo techniques in order to compare the effects of different fluid loading strategies on CO fluctuation under a norepinephrine infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 102 healthy term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for this randomized double-blind study and divided them into two groups: the colloid preload followed by crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 1, <i>n</i> = 51), and the colloid and crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 2, <i>n</i> = 51). The infusion of norepinephrine was started after intrathecal injection. Vigileo was used to monitor invasive hemodynamic indices. Our primary outcome was standardized maternal cardiac output (CO) readings taken from spinal anesthesia until delivery. The secondary outcome measures were stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, nausea/vomiting and total norepinephrine dose. Neonatal outcome was assessed by recording Apgar scores 1 and 5 min after delivery and by measuring umbilical arterial (UA) blood gases. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring was performed during the first 15 min after spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline CO, SV, and SBP were similar for both groups. Before spinal anesthesia, CO (6.84 ± 1.18 vs. 5.51 ± 0.96 L/min, <i>P</i> < 0.001) was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2, but this increase was not sustained after spinal anesthesia (<i>P</i> > 0.05). SV (75.98 ± 13.01 vs. 66.37 ± 12.42 mL, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and SBP (124.84 ± 11.61 vs. 116.57 ± 7.57 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001); followed a similar trend in the study. Only the largest percentage change in maternal HR (4.89 ± 11.89 vs. 10.38 ± 14.07, <i>P</i> = 0.036) was significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the maximum CO, SV, SBP, or HR after spinal anesthesia (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes, were similar in two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In combination with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, 500-mL colloid preloading and 500-mL crystalloid coloading can significantly increase CO before spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections and provide improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia, with no difference in maternal or neonatal outcomes as compared to colloid and crystalloid coloading.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300073333.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1421947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1421947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hypotension is a common complication of spinal anesthesia during cesarean section, and no single intervention has been shown to eliminate maternal hypotension. Fluid loading strategies combined with vasopressor drug regimens can achieve this goal by maximizing cardiac output (CO) and minimizing the fall in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). However, the optimal fluid volume, type, and timing of administration have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to use Vigileo techniques in order to compare the effects of different fluid loading strategies on CO fluctuation under a norepinephrine infusion.

Methods: We recruited 102 healthy term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for this randomized double-blind study and divided them into two groups: the colloid preload followed by crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 1, n = 51), and the colloid and crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 2, n = 51). The infusion of norepinephrine was started after intrathecal injection. Vigileo was used to monitor invasive hemodynamic indices. Our primary outcome was standardized maternal cardiac output (CO) readings taken from spinal anesthesia until delivery. The secondary outcome measures were stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, nausea/vomiting and total norepinephrine dose. Neonatal outcome was assessed by recording Apgar scores 1 and 5 min after delivery and by measuring umbilical arterial (UA) blood gases. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring was performed during the first 15 min after spinal anesthesia.

Results: Baseline CO, SV, and SBP were similar for both groups. Before spinal anesthesia, CO (6.84 ± 1.18 vs. 5.51 ± 0.96 L/min, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2, but this increase was not sustained after spinal anesthesia (P > 0.05). SV (75.98 ± 13.01 vs. 66.37 ± 12.42 mL, P < 0.001) and SBP (124.84 ± 11.61 vs. 116.57 ± 7.57 mmHg, P < 0.001); followed a similar trend in the study. Only the largest percentage change in maternal HR (4.89 ± 11.89 vs. 10.38 ± 14.07, P = 0.036) was significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the maximum CO, SV, SBP, or HR after spinal anesthesia (P > 0.05). The maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes, were similar in two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: In combination with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, 500-mL colloid preloading and 500-mL crystalloid coloading can significantly increase CO before spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections and provide improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia, with no difference in maternal or neonatal outcomes as compared to colloid and crystalloid coloading.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300073333.

预防性联合去甲肾上腺素输注下,脊髓麻醉剖宫产术产妇心输出量与胶体和晶体复合灌注相比的影响。
目的:低血压是剖宫产术中脊柱麻醉的常见并发症,目前还没有单一的干预措施可以消除产妇低血压。液体负荷策略结合血管加压药物方案可以通过最大化心输出量(CO)和最小化全身血管阻力(SVR)的下降来实现这一目标。然而,最佳的液体量、类型和给药时间尚未完全阐明。因此,本研究旨在使用Vigileo技术来比较不同液体加载策略对去甲肾上腺素输注下CO波动的影响。方法:本研究随机双盲方法招募102例健康足月剖宫产麻下择期剖宫产孕妇,并将其分为两组:胶体预负荷组和结晶负荷组(每组500 ml;组1,n = 51),胶体和晶体负载组(各500 ml;第二组,n = 51)。鞘内注射后开始输注去甲肾上腺素。使用Vigileo监测有创血流动力学指标。我们的主要结局是标准化的产妇心输出量(CO)读数从脊髓麻醉到分娩。次要结局指标为脑卒中容量(SV)、收缩压(SBP)、心率(HR)、低血压、高血压、心动过缓、恶心/呕吐发作次数和去甲肾上腺素总剂量。新生儿结局通过分娩后1和5分钟记录Apgar评分和测量脐动脉(UA)血气来评估。在脊髓麻醉后的前15分钟进行连续血流动力学监测。结果:两组的基线CO、SV和收缩压相似。麻醉前,1组CO(6.84±1.18∶5.51±0.96 L/min, P < 0.001)显著高于2组,麻醉后无明显升高(P < 0.05)。SV(75.98±13.01 vs. 66.37±12.42 mL, P < 0.001)、收缩压(124.84±11.61 vs. 116.57±7.57 mmHg, P < 0.001);在研究中也有类似的趋势。两组间差异最大的是产妇HR(4.89±11.89∶10.38±14.07,P = 0.036)。两组脊髓麻醉后最大CO、SV、SBP、HR差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组产妇不良反应及新生儿结局相似(P < 0.05)。结论:在预防性输注去甲肾上腺素的情况下,500 ml胶体预压和500 ml晶体结膜可显著提高剖宫产脊髓麻醉前CO,改善脊髓麻醉后血流动力学稳定性,与胶体结膜和晶体结膜结膜相比,产妇和新生儿结局无差异。临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn,标识符ChiCTR2300073333。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信