Effect of combined colloid preloading and crystalloid coloading versus combined colloid and crystalloid coloading on maternal cardiac output during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section under combined prophylactic noradrenaline infusion.
Xiang Gao, Yu Huang, Sumei Hu, Chuantao Lin, Yi You, Shihong Huang, Ming Liu, Jianying Yan
{"title":"Effect of combined colloid preloading and crystalloid coloading versus combined colloid and crystalloid coloading on maternal cardiac output during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section under combined prophylactic noradrenaline infusion.","authors":"Xiang Gao, Yu Huang, Sumei Hu, Chuantao Lin, Yi You, Shihong Huang, Ming Liu, Jianying Yan","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1421947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hypotension is a common complication of spinal anesthesia during cesarean section, and no single intervention has been shown to eliminate maternal hypotension. Fluid loading strategies combined with vasopressor drug regimens can achieve this goal by maximizing cardiac output (CO) and minimizing the fall in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). However, the optimal fluid volume, type, and timing of administration have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to use Vigileo techniques in order to compare the effects of different fluid loading strategies on CO fluctuation under a norepinephrine infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 102 healthy term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for this randomized double-blind study and divided them into two groups: the colloid preload followed by crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 1, <i>n</i> = 51), and the colloid and crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 2, <i>n</i> = 51). The infusion of norepinephrine was started after intrathecal injection. Vigileo was used to monitor invasive hemodynamic indices. Our primary outcome was standardized maternal cardiac output (CO) readings taken from spinal anesthesia until delivery. The secondary outcome measures were stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, nausea/vomiting and total norepinephrine dose. Neonatal outcome was assessed by recording Apgar scores 1 and 5 min after delivery and by measuring umbilical arterial (UA) blood gases. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring was performed during the first 15 min after spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline CO, SV, and SBP were similar for both groups. Before spinal anesthesia, CO (6.84 ± 1.18 vs. 5.51 ± 0.96 L/min, <i>P</i> < 0.001) was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2, but this increase was not sustained after spinal anesthesia (<i>P</i> > 0.05). SV (75.98 ± 13.01 vs. 66.37 ± 12.42 mL, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and SBP (124.84 ± 11.61 vs. 116.57 ± 7.57 mmHg, <i>P</i> < 0.001); followed a similar trend in the study. Only the largest percentage change in maternal HR (4.89 ± 11.89 vs. 10.38 ± 14.07, <i>P</i> = 0.036) was significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the maximum CO, SV, SBP, or HR after spinal anesthesia (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes, were similar in two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In combination with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, 500-mL colloid preloading and 500-mL crystalloid coloading can significantly increase CO before spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections and provide improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia, with no difference in maternal or neonatal outcomes as compared to colloid and crystalloid coloading.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn, identifier ChiCTR2300073333.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1421947"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1421947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Hypotension is a common complication of spinal anesthesia during cesarean section, and no single intervention has been shown to eliminate maternal hypotension. Fluid loading strategies combined with vasopressor drug regimens can achieve this goal by maximizing cardiac output (CO) and minimizing the fall in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). However, the optimal fluid volume, type, and timing of administration have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to use Vigileo techniques in order to compare the effects of different fluid loading strategies on CO fluctuation under a norepinephrine infusion.
Methods: We recruited 102 healthy term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia for this randomized double-blind study and divided them into two groups: the colloid preload followed by crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 1, n = 51), and the colloid and crystalloid coload group (500 ml each; Group 2, n = 51). The infusion of norepinephrine was started after intrathecal injection. Vigileo was used to monitor invasive hemodynamic indices. Our primary outcome was standardized maternal cardiac output (CO) readings taken from spinal anesthesia until delivery. The secondary outcome measures were stroke volume (SV), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), number of episodes of hypotension, hypertension, bradycardia, nausea/vomiting and total norepinephrine dose. Neonatal outcome was assessed by recording Apgar scores 1 and 5 min after delivery and by measuring umbilical arterial (UA) blood gases. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring was performed during the first 15 min after spinal anesthesia.
Results: Baseline CO, SV, and SBP were similar for both groups. Before spinal anesthesia, CO (6.84 ± 1.18 vs. 5.51 ± 0.96 L/min, P < 0.001) was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2, but this increase was not sustained after spinal anesthesia (P > 0.05). SV (75.98 ± 13.01 vs. 66.37 ± 12.42 mL, P < 0.001) and SBP (124.84 ± 11.61 vs. 116.57 ± 7.57 mmHg, P < 0.001); followed a similar trend in the study. Only the largest percentage change in maternal HR (4.89 ± 11.89 vs. 10.38 ± 14.07, P = 0.036) was significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the maximum CO, SV, SBP, or HR after spinal anesthesia (P > 0.05). The maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes, were similar in two groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: In combination with prophylactic norepinephrine infusion, 500-mL colloid preloading and 500-mL crystalloid coloading can significantly increase CO before spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections and provide improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia, with no difference in maternal or neonatal outcomes as compared to colloid and crystalloid coloading.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate
- the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions
- the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines
- the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities
- access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide
- addressing the grand health challenges around the world