Marco Di Carlo, Ilaria Pianesi, Mariachiara Mangiafico, Fausto Salaffi, Marika Tardella
{"title":"Evaluating the role of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease.","authors":"Marco Di Carlo, Ilaria Pianesi, Mariachiara Mangiafico, Fausto Salaffi, Marika Tardella","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2025.2539440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The involvement of the pulmonary parenchyma in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), characterized by the presence of interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), represents one of the most common and potentially severe extra-articular manifestations of the disease. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest is considered the gold standard diagnostic technique; however, its reliance on ionizing radiation and the limited availability of imaging equipment make it challenging to perform repeatedly. Over the past decade, lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a noninvasive and easily repeatable technique for detecting the presence of RA-ILD.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review summarizes the currently available evidence on the use of LUS in RA-ILD. It begins by defining the elementary lesions indicative of pulmonary involvement (B-lines and pleural irregularities) and provides an overview of LUS application in other connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILDs).</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Current evidence suggests a promising role for LUS in the screening of RA-ILD, primarily based on the quantification of B-lines. Initially, a threshold of 10 B-lines was proposed, which has recently been lowered to 5, demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity in detecting RA-ILD. Future directions should focus on the role of pleural irregularities and the further standardization of the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2025.2539440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The involvement of the pulmonary parenchyma in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), characterized by the presence of interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD), represents one of the most common and potentially severe extra-articular manifestations of the disease. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the chest is considered the gold standard diagnostic technique; however, its reliance on ionizing radiation and the limited availability of imaging equipment make it challenging to perform repeatedly. Over the past decade, lung ultrasound (LUS) has emerged as a noninvasive and easily repeatable technique for detecting the presence of RA-ILD.
Areas covered: This narrative review summarizes the currently available evidence on the use of LUS in RA-ILD. It begins by defining the elementary lesions indicative of pulmonary involvement (B-lines and pleural irregularities) and provides an overview of LUS application in other connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILDs).
Expert opinion: Current evidence suggests a promising role for LUS in the screening of RA-ILD, primarily based on the quantification of B-lines. Initially, a threshold of 10 B-lines was proposed, which has recently been lowered to 5, demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity in detecting RA-ILD. Future directions should focus on the role of pleural irregularities and the further standardization of the technique.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.