Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Three Different Sealers and Three Various Obturation Techniques.

IF 2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fatima Salim, Biland Mohammed Saleem
{"title":"Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Three Different Sealers and Three Various Obturation Techniques.","authors":"Fatima Salim, Biland Mohammed Saleem","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.85866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this investigation was to assess and compare the fracture resistance of roots filled with AH Plus, Total Fill and AH Plus bioceramic sealers using single cone, warm vertical compaction (WVC), and soft-core techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized the palatal root canals of eighty extracted human maxillary first molars. All roots were sectioned to maintain a uniform root length of 11 mm. The samples were mechanically prepared using EdgeFile X7 rotary files to size 40/0.04. Eight teeth were left unfilled as a control group, while the remaining teeth were classified into three primary categories according to the sealer utilized for obturation; AH plus, TotallFill and AH Plus Bioceramic (BC). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n = 8) based on the obturation technique; single-cone, WVC and soft-core. Every tooth was set into blocks of acrylic resin, and a universal testing equipment (Instron Corp) with a metal-like spreader tip was used to measure the fracture force at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The collected data were examined utilizing ANOVA, succeeded by Tukey's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The control group's fracture resistance values were significantly less than the obturated groups in study. Overall, the fracture resistance of AH Plus and AH Plus BC were significantly higher than that of Total Fill BC sealers. The WVC and soft-core were significantly higher than single cone techniques. The obturation technique did not significantly influence the fracture resistance of AH Plus and Total Fill. While the fracture resistance of AH Plus BC was significantly impacted., WVC was significantly higher than single cone group. When roots were obturated with WVC technique, AH Plus BC exhibited statistically significant higher values of fracture resistance than AH plus and Total Fill. There was no significant difference between the three sealers when single cone and soft-core were used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this in vitro investigation, Obturation with AH Plus and AH Plus BC sealers enhanced the fracture resistance of the roots more significantly than TotalFill BC sealer, while obturation with WVC and soft-core yielded greater fracture resistance compared to the single cone approach. (EEJ-2024-11-170).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 4","pages":"326-332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303123/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.85866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this investigation was to assess and compare the fracture resistance of roots filled with AH Plus, Total Fill and AH Plus bioceramic sealers using single cone, warm vertical compaction (WVC), and soft-core techniques.

Methods: This study utilized the palatal root canals of eighty extracted human maxillary first molars. All roots were sectioned to maintain a uniform root length of 11 mm. The samples were mechanically prepared using EdgeFile X7 rotary files to size 40/0.04. Eight teeth were left unfilled as a control group, while the remaining teeth were classified into three primary categories according to the sealer utilized for obturation; AH plus, TotallFill and AH Plus Bioceramic (BC). Each group was divided into three subgroups (n = 8) based on the obturation technique; single-cone, WVC and soft-core. Every tooth was set into blocks of acrylic resin, and a universal testing equipment (Instron Corp) with a metal-like spreader tip was used to measure the fracture force at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The collected data were examined utilizing ANOVA, succeeded by Tukey's test.

Results: The control group's fracture resistance values were significantly less than the obturated groups in study. Overall, the fracture resistance of AH Plus and AH Plus BC were significantly higher than that of Total Fill BC sealers. The WVC and soft-core were significantly higher than single cone techniques. The obturation technique did not significantly influence the fracture resistance of AH Plus and Total Fill. While the fracture resistance of AH Plus BC was significantly impacted., WVC was significantly higher than single cone group. When roots were obturated with WVC technique, AH Plus BC exhibited statistically significant higher values of fracture resistance than AH plus and Total Fill. There was no significant difference between the three sealers when single cone and soft-core were used.

Conclusion: According to this in vitro investigation, Obturation with AH Plus and AH Plus BC sealers enhanced the fracture resistance of the roots more significantly than TotalFill BC sealer, while obturation with WVC and soft-core yielded greater fracture resistance compared to the single cone approach. (EEJ-2024-11-170).

三种不同的封闭剂和三种不同的封闭技术对根的抗折断性的评价。
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较使用单锥、温垂直压实(WVC)和软核技术的AH Plus、Total Fill和AH Plus生物陶瓷密封剂填充根的抗骨折性。方法:利用80颗拔除的上颌第一磨牙的腭根管进行研究。所有根均切片,以保持均匀的根长为11毫米。使用EdgeFile X7旋转文件机械制备样品,大小为40/0.04。8颗牙不补牙作为对照组,其余牙根据使用的封闭剂分为3大类;AH +, totalfill和AH +生物陶瓷(BC)。每组根据封堵技术分为3个亚组(n = 8);单锥、WVC和软芯。每颗牙都被固定在丙烯酸树脂块中,使用一种通用测试设备(Instron Corp)以0.5 mm/min的速度测量带有金属状扩展头的断裂力。对收集的数据进行方差分析,然后进行Tukey检验。结果:对照组骨折阻力值明显小于闭孔组。总的来说,AH Plus和AH Plus BC的抗骨折性明显高于Total Fill BC。WVC和软核均显著高于单锥体技术。封闭技术对AH +和Total Fill的抗骨折性无显著影响。AH + BC的抗骨折性受到明显影响。, WVC显著高于单锥组。当用WVC技术封闭根时,AH + BC比AH +和Total Fill表现出更高的抗骨折性值。使用单锥和软芯时,三种封口剂之间无显著差异。结论:在体外研究中,AH Plus和AH Plus BC封闭剂比TotalFill BC封闭剂更明显地增强了根的抗骨折性,而WVC和软核封闭剂比单锥封闭方法具有更大的抗骨折性。(eej - 2024 - 11 - 170)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信