Antimicrobial Effectiveness of High-Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Devices Combined with Stepwise Intraoperative or Final Activation of Sodium Hypochlorite.

IF 2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Flaviana Bombarda De Andrade, Maricel Rosario Cardenas Cuellar, Victor Feliz Pedrinha, Márcia Sirlene Zardin Graeff, Gianluca Plotino
{"title":"Antimicrobial Effectiveness of High-Power Sonic and Ultrasonic Devices Combined with Stepwise Intraoperative or Final Activation of Sodium Hypochlorite.","authors":"Flaviana Bombarda De Andrade, Maricel Rosario Cardenas Cuellar, Victor Feliz Pedrinha, Márcia Sirlene Zardin Graeff, Gianluca Plotino","doi":"10.14744/eej.2025.69926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the intratubular decontamination promoted by high-power sonic and ultrasonic devices using either a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) technique or a final conventional activation (CA) approach during root canal chemomechanical preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty human lower premolars were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and assigned into five groups (n=8): conventional syringe irrigation (CSI); final ultrasonic activation (FUA) using the ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; final sonic agitation (FSA) using the high-power sonic insert 20/28 Eddy system (both CA techniques); stepwise ultrasonic activation (SUA); and stepwise sonic agitation (SSA) using the same devices during and after canal preparation (SIA techniques). Remaining specimens served as controls. Root canal preparation was performed with the Reciproc system and 5.25% NaOCl, followed by final irrigation with 17% EDTA. Bacterial viability was assessed via confocal microscopy with Live/Dead technique. Statistical analysis was employed using non-parametric tests (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SUA showed the lowest bacterial viability, followed by FSA, both statistically similar. SSA and FUA were similar but less effective than SUA and FSA (p<0.05). The CSI group had significantly higher bacterial viability compared to all other groups (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-power sonic agitation and ultrasonic activation enhanced intratubular decontamination against E. faecalis. The SIA technique, using IRRI S or Eddy systems, effectively reduced bacterial viability and represents a promising approach for root canal disinfection. (EEJ-2024-11-185).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"10 4","pages":"312-318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2025.69926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the intratubular decontamination promoted by high-power sonic and ultrasonic devices using either a stepwise intraoperative activation (SIA) technique or a final conventional activation (CA) approach during root canal chemomechanical preparation.

Methods: Fifty human lower premolars were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis and assigned into five groups (n=8): conventional syringe irrigation (CSI); final ultrasonic activation (FUA) using the ultrasonic insert 25/25 IRRI S; final sonic agitation (FSA) using the high-power sonic insert 20/28 Eddy system (both CA techniques); stepwise ultrasonic activation (SUA); and stepwise sonic agitation (SSA) using the same devices during and after canal preparation (SIA techniques). Remaining specimens served as controls. Root canal preparation was performed with the Reciproc system and 5.25% NaOCl, followed by final irrigation with 17% EDTA. Bacterial viability was assessed via confocal microscopy with Live/Dead technique. Statistical analysis was employed using non-parametric tests (α=0.05).

Results: SUA showed the lowest bacterial viability, followed by FSA, both statistically similar. SSA and FUA were similar but less effective than SUA and FSA (p<0.05). The CSI group had significantly higher bacterial viability compared to all other groups (p<0.05).

Conclusion: High-power sonic agitation and ultrasonic activation enhanced intratubular decontamination against E. faecalis. The SIA technique, using IRRI S or Eddy systems, effectively reduced bacterial viability and represents a promising approach for root canal disinfection. (EEJ-2024-11-185).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高功率超声设备与次氯酸钠术中或最终活化联合抗菌效果的研究。
目的:本研究探讨了在根管化学力学准备过程中,采用逐步术中激活(SIA)技术或最终常规激活(CA)方法的高功率超声和超声设备对管内去污的促进作用。方法:将50例感染粪肠球菌的人下前磨牙分为5组(n=8):常规注射器冲洗组(CSI);最终超声激活(FUA)使用超声插入25/25 IRRI S;使用高功率声波插入20/28涡流系统(两种CA技术)的末声波搅拌(FSA);逐步超声活化(SUA);以及在根管准备期间和之后使用相同设备的逐步声波搅拌(SSA) (SIA技术)。其余标本作为对照。用Reciproc系统和5.25%的NaOCl进行根管预备,最后用17%的EDTA冲洗。通过共聚焦显微镜活/死技术评估细菌活力。采用非参数检验进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。结果:SUA菌活力最低,FSA次之,两者差异有统计学意义。结论:高功率超声搅拌和超声激活能增强对粪肠杆菌的管内净化作用。SIA技术,使用IRRI S或涡流系统,有效地降低了细菌活力,代表了一种有前途的根管消毒方法。(eej - 2024 - 11 - 185)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信