Giacomo Guidi, Angelica Naldini, Giorgia Garganese, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Anna Fagotti, Nicoló Bizzarri
{"title":"Endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy for vulvar cancer, is it feasible?","authors":"Giacomo Guidi, Angelica Naldini, Giorgia Garganese, Simona Maria Fragomeni, Anna Fagotti, Nicoló Bizzarri","doi":"10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The evaluation of lymph node status is crucial for the correct staging of patients with vulvar carcinoma and to assess whether adjuvant treatment is necessary. Classically, this procedure is performed with an open approach to the inguinal region; however, this procedure is associated with a significant complication rate.For this reason, the video-endoscopic approach to inguinal lymph node assessment has been proposed in recent years. This review aimed to provide an overview on the feasibility and outcomes of the video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>VEIL appeared to be a viable alternative to the open approach, with similar outcomes in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed and blood loss. While the postoperative complications rate was lower in the VEIL group, operative times tended to be longer. This may be due to the lack of standardization of the technique and to the variability in video-endoscopic approaches (laparoscopic vs robotic). Sentinel lymph node biopsy with endoscopic approach has also been described.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>VEIL appears to be feasible and safe, adding benefits in terms of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, few studies are available and further data is needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10893,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"487-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12337939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: The evaluation of lymph node status is crucial for the correct staging of patients with vulvar carcinoma and to assess whether adjuvant treatment is necessary. Classically, this procedure is performed with an open approach to the inguinal region; however, this procedure is associated with a significant complication rate.For this reason, the video-endoscopic approach to inguinal lymph node assessment has been proposed in recent years. This review aimed to provide an overview on the feasibility and outcomes of the video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL).
Recent findings: VEIL appeared to be a viable alternative to the open approach, with similar outcomes in terms of the number of lymph nodes removed and blood loss. While the postoperative complications rate was lower in the VEIL group, operative times tended to be longer. This may be due to the lack of standardization of the technique and to the variability in video-endoscopic approaches (laparoscopic vs robotic). Sentinel lymph node biopsy with endoscopic approach has also been described.
Summary: VEIL appears to be feasible and safe, adding benefits in terms of postoperative complications. Nevertheless, few studies are available and further data is needed to confirm these findings.
期刊介绍:
With its easy-to-digest reviews on important advances in world literature, Current Opinion in Oncology offers expert evaluation on a wide range of topics from sixteen key disciplines including sarcomas, cancer biology, melanoma and endocrine tumors. Published bimonthly, each issue covers in detail the most pertinent advances in these fields from the previous year. This is supplemented by annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.