Sungwook Chun, Kyungyeon Jung, Bin Hong, Ju-Young Shin, Ji Young Lee
{"title":"Treatment patterns of menopausal hormone therapy in South Korea: a nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Sungwook Chun, Kyungyeon Jung, Bin Hong, Ju-Young Shin, Ji Young Lee","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2025.2524165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms. While guidelines recommend an individualized risk-benefit assessment of MHT, real-world studies on use of MHT are limited.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nationwide claims data in South Korea (2015-2020) were used to assess the prevalence of hospital visits for menopausal symptoms and use of MHT among women aged 40-59 years. MHT was classified into three classes including estrogen therapy (ET), estrogen plus progestogen therapy (EPT) and tibolone, with routes of administration categorized as systemic (oral, transdermal) and local (transvaginal). A longitudinal study was conducted to evaluate treatment patterns of MHT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 9% of women visited hospitals for menopausal symptoms, with fewer than half prescribed MHT. Of 1,774,674 women with menopausal symptoms, 1,036,294 were prescribed MHT: 89,237 patients were started on systemic ET, 300,999 on systemic EPT, 306,538 on tibolone and 378,764 on local ET. Use of tibolone and local ET increased over time, while systemic ET and EPT decreased. Systemic MHT was discontinued after an average of 13.2 months, while local MHT was discontinued after 2.4 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite guidelines recommending MHT for treating menopausal symptoms, many women remain untreated and continued MHT for an average of only 1 year.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2524165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms. While guidelines recommend an individualized risk-benefit assessment of MHT, real-world studies on use of MHT are limited.
Method: Nationwide claims data in South Korea (2015-2020) were used to assess the prevalence of hospital visits for menopausal symptoms and use of MHT among women aged 40-59 years. MHT was classified into three classes including estrogen therapy (ET), estrogen plus progestogen therapy (EPT) and tibolone, with routes of administration categorized as systemic (oral, transdermal) and local (transvaginal). A longitudinal study was conducted to evaluate treatment patterns of MHT.
Results: Approximately 9% of women visited hospitals for menopausal symptoms, with fewer than half prescribed MHT. Of 1,774,674 women with menopausal symptoms, 1,036,294 were prescribed MHT: 89,237 patients were started on systemic ET, 300,999 on systemic EPT, 306,538 on tibolone and 378,764 on local ET. Use of tibolone and local ET increased over time, while systemic ET and EPT decreased. Systemic MHT was discontinued after an average of 13.2 months, while local MHT was discontinued after 2.4 months.
Conclusion: Despite guidelines recommending MHT for treating menopausal symptoms, many women remain untreated and continued MHT for an average of only 1 year.
期刊介绍:
Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women.
Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments.
The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.