Major complications and surgical reintervention after ultrasound-guided transcervical radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids : A 10-year Experience.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ning Hai, Shan Jin, Runyu Tian, Qingxiang Hou
{"title":"Major complications and surgical reintervention after ultrasound-guided transcervical radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids : A 10-year Experience.","authors":"Ning Hai, Shan Jin, Runyu Tian, Qingxiang Hou","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for major complications and surgical reintervention following transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of uterine fibroids.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 1290 patients with 1358 symptomatic uterine fibroids underwent outpatient transcervical ultrasound-guided RFA between July 2009 and July 2021. Medical records were reviewed to assess major complications and surgical reintervention rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of major complications was 5.1% (66/1290), including intestinal perforation (n = 1, 0.08%), infection (n = 39, 3.0%), intrauterine adhesions (n = 24, 1.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 2, 0.15%). The 10-year cumulative surgical reintervention rate was 8.5%. Indications for reintervention included persistent fibroid-related symptoms (n = 65, 5.0%), fibroid recurrence (n = 35, 2.7%), intracavitary free myoma (n = 9, 0.7%), and malignant uterine mesenchymal neoplasia (n = 1, 0.08%). Multivariate analysis identified increased puncture frequency as a risk factor for postoperative infection (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.02-10.7; P = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcervical ultrasound-guided RFA is a well-tolerated outpatient procedure with an acceptably low rate of major complications and surgical reintervention for treatment of uterine fibroids.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>ore punctures may contribute to higher infection rate. There is a need to keep all the uterine fibroids in check after RFA since malignant neoplasia may occur over a period.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for major complications and surgical reintervention following transcervical ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of uterine fibroids.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 1290 patients with 1358 symptomatic uterine fibroids underwent outpatient transcervical ultrasound-guided RFA between July 2009 and July 2021. Medical records were reviewed to assess major complications and surgical reintervention rates.

Results: The overall incidence of major complications was 5.1% (66/1290), including intestinal perforation (n = 1, 0.08%), infection (n = 39, 3.0%), intrauterine adhesions (n = 24, 1.9%), and deep venous thrombosis (n = 2, 0.15%). The 10-year cumulative surgical reintervention rate was 8.5%. Indications for reintervention included persistent fibroid-related symptoms (n = 65, 5.0%), fibroid recurrence (n = 35, 2.7%), intracavitary free myoma (n = 9, 0.7%), and malignant uterine mesenchymal neoplasia (n = 1, 0.08%). Multivariate analysis identified increased puncture frequency as a risk factor for postoperative infection (OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.02-10.7; P = 0.046).

Conclusion: Transcervical ultrasound-guided RFA is a well-tolerated outpatient procedure with an acceptably low rate of major complications and surgical reintervention for treatment of uterine fibroids.

Advances in knowledge: ore punctures may contribute to higher infection rate. There is a need to keep all the uterine fibroids in check after RFA since malignant neoplasia may occur over a period.

超声引导下经宫颈射频消融子宫肌瘤后的主要并发症和手术再干预:一个10年的经验。
目的:探讨超声引导下经宫颈子宫肌瘤射频消融术(RFA)后主要并发症的发生率、危险因素及手术再干预。方法:在本回顾性研究中,2009年7月至2021年7月,1290例1358例有症状的子宫肌瘤患者接受了门诊经宫颈超声引导下的RFA。审查医疗记录以评估主要并发症和手术再干预率。结果:主要并发症发生率为5.1%(66/1290),主要并发症包括肠穿孔(n = 1, 0.08%)、感染(n = 39, 3.0%)、宫腔粘连(n = 24, 1.9%)、深静脉血栓形成(n = 2, 0.15%)。10年累计手术再干预率为8.5%。再干预的适应症包括持续肌瘤相关症状(n = 65, 5.0%)、肌瘤复发(n = 35, 2.7%)、腔内无肌瘤(n = 9, 0.7%)和恶性子宫间质瘤(n = 1, 0.08%)。多因素分析发现,穿刺频率增加是术后感染的危险因素(OR = 3.32, 95% CI: 1.02-10.7;p = 0.046)。结论:经宫颈超声引导下的RFA治疗子宫肌瘤是一种耐受性良好的门诊手术,主要并发症和手术再干预率低。知识的进步:更多的穿刺可能导致更高的感染率。由于恶性肿瘤可能会在一段时间内发生,因此需要对RFA后的所有子宫肌瘤进行检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信