Development and psychometric evaluation of the dental care attitudes scale (DCAS).

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Márton Lukács, Balázs Fábián, Gábor Papp, Antal Bugán, István Varga
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of the dental care attitudes scale (DCAS).","authors":"Márton Lukács, Balázs Fábián, Gábor Papp, Antal Bugán, István Varga","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06655-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study describes the development and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Dental Care Attitudes Scale (DCAS), a new instrument for the measurement of attitudes towards dental care services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scale development employed qualitative and quantitative research methods. The initial set of items was developed from the transcripts of semi-structured interviews conducted with 16 dental patients. The psychometric properties of the DCAS were refined using an initial sample of 132 adults, and then a second sample of 744 participants (non-clinical sample of adults, dental students, and dentists). The five-factor structure was confirmed via CFA in the adult non-clinical sample (n = 527). Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha values. Validity was assessed by examining the correlation coefficients of DCAS scores with established dental health scales, including the Dental Fear Survey, Dental Anxiety Scale, and Dental Belief Survey. Group differences were assessed by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final measure was found to have 17 items, and five factors: Environment, Anesthesia, Delay, Social Status, and System-Related Dissatisfaction. CFA showed good fit (CMIN/DF = 2.11; CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.046), and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.66 to 0.78. The association of the DCAS subscales with other measures were all in line with theoretical expectations, indicating good convergent and divergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Dental Care Attitudes Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing attitudes towards dental care. The DCAS identified several attitudes that may hinder dental care attendance and dentist-patient cooperation. By understanding these attitudes, which the DCAS can measure, dentists can address potential issues in clinical practice and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06655-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study describes the development and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Dental Care Attitudes Scale (DCAS), a new instrument for the measurement of attitudes towards dental care services.

Methods: Scale development employed qualitative and quantitative research methods. The initial set of items was developed from the transcripts of semi-structured interviews conducted with 16 dental patients. The psychometric properties of the DCAS were refined using an initial sample of 132 adults, and then a second sample of 744 participants (non-clinical sample of adults, dental students, and dentists). The five-factor structure was confirmed via CFA in the adult non-clinical sample (n = 527). Reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha values. Validity was assessed by examining the correlation coefficients of DCAS scores with established dental health scales, including the Dental Fear Survey, Dental Anxiety Scale, and Dental Belief Survey. Group differences were assessed by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results: The final measure was found to have 17 items, and five factors: Environment, Anesthesia, Delay, Social Status, and System-Related Dissatisfaction. CFA showed good fit (CMIN/DF = 2.11; CFI = 0.94; RMSEA = 0.046), and Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.66 to 0.78. The association of the DCAS subscales with other measures were all in line with theoretical expectations, indicating good convergent and divergent validity.

Conclusion: The Dental Care Attitudes Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing attitudes towards dental care. The DCAS identified several attitudes that may hinder dental care attendance and dentist-patient cooperation. By understanding these attitudes, which the DCAS can measure, dentists can address potential issues in clinical practice and improve patient care.

牙科护理态度量表(DCAS)的编制及心理测量学评价。
背景:本研究描述了牙科保健态度量表(DCAS)的开发和信度和效度评估,这是一种测量牙科保健服务态度的新工具。方法:采用定性与定量相结合的研究方法进行量表开发。最初的一组项目是从对16名牙科患者进行的半结构化访谈的笔录中开发出来的。DCAS的心理测量特性通过132名成年人的初始样本和744名参与者的第二样本(成人、牙科学生和牙医的非临床样本)进行了改进。通过CFA在成人非临床样本(n = 527)中证实了五因素结构。采用Cronbach’s alpha值评估信度。通过检验DCAS评分与现有牙科健康量表(包括牙科恐惧量表、牙科焦虑量表和牙科信念量表)的相关系数来评估效度。通过Mann-Whitney U和Kruskal-Wallis检验评估组间差异。结果:最终的测量有17个项目,5个因素:环境、麻醉、延迟、社会地位和系统相关的不满。CFA拟合良好(CMIN/DF = 2.11;cfi = 0.94;RMSEA = 0.046), Cronbach's alpha范围为0.66 ~ 0.78。DCAS子量表与其他测量的关联均符合理论预期,表明具有良好的收敛效度和发散效度。结论:口腔保健态度量表是一种可靠、有效的评估口腔保健态度的工具。DCAS确定了几种可能阻碍牙科护理出席和牙医-病人合作的态度。通过了解这些态度(DCAS可以测量),牙医可以解决临床实践中的潜在问题并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信