Emerging Terbinafine Resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis, Testing Options and Alternative Treatments: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Thuvarahan Jegathees, Zachary P Holmes, Catherine Martin, Cindy Kalai, Catherine Voutier, Denis Spelman, Gemma Robertson, Johannes S Kern
{"title":"Emerging Terbinafine Resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis, Testing Options and Alternative Treatments: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Thuvarahan Jegathees, Zachary P Holmes, Catherine Martin, Cindy Kalai, Catherine Voutier, Denis Spelman, Gemma Robertson, Johannes S Kern","doi":"10.1111/ajd.14575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dermatophytosis is a common superficial fungal infection of the skin, most often caused by dermatophytes from the Trichophyton genus. Terbinafine, which inhibits squalene epoxidase (SQLE), is widely used as first line treatment. However, resistance to terbinafine is increasing globally, including recent reports in Australia, with origins suspected to trace back to South Asia. Antifungal susceptibility testing is not routinely available in Australia, and globally, there are no standardised breakpoints for traditional culture-based methods. Although SQLE gene mutations have been associated with terbinafine resistance, a major research gap exists in the clinical interpretation of these mutations due to a lack of correlation between MIC values, genetic mutations and clinical treatment outcomes. This gap hampers the ability to guide clinical decision-making. Therefore, our objective was to assess the global prevalence of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton infections, identify the most clinically relevant resistance testing methods, and determine effective alternative treatment options. The study was designed by systematic review. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane's Trials database (CENTRAL), Global Health (CABI), Trials registries, along with Google Scholar and Web of Science (WoS) for the tracking of included articles. Published human studies in English from 2000 to 2023 of Terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis with confirmed antifungal susceptibility tests and genotyping of dermatophytes, as well as details of effective alternative treatments. Identified cases were independently screened by two authors on the basis of predetermined criteria. Thirty four studies reported 743 samples for which mutation data of the SQLE gene and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were available. Twenty three studies reported on 149 patients who had used terbinafine with available MIC data. Of these, 94 cases demonstrated evidence of clinical resistance to terbinafine with confirmed SQLE genotyping and MIC data. Seven studies reported on 13 cases of clinical resistance to terbinafine with a reported MIC and a successful alternative therapy. There are no published MIC breakpoints for terbinafine resistance in antifungal resistance testing, creating significant challenges for clinical interpretation. This study suggests that an estimate of a provisional MIC threshold for resistance is calculated to be 1.69 μg/mL. Importantly, SQLE mutation data, particularly the presence of F397L, L393F and A448T shows a robust association with clinical resistance to terbinafine (odds ratio: 7.58; 14.0, 7.78, respectively). Routine SQLE mutation testing in cases of suspected terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis could enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform more effective, timely treatment decisions. Identifying specific mutations may guide clinicians in selecting alternative antifungal agents earlier in the treatment course, reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42022382880.</p>","PeriodicalId":8638,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajd.14575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dermatophytosis is a common superficial fungal infection of the skin, most often caused by dermatophytes from the Trichophyton genus. Terbinafine, which inhibits squalene epoxidase (SQLE), is widely used as first line treatment. However, resistance to terbinafine is increasing globally, including recent reports in Australia, with origins suspected to trace back to South Asia. Antifungal susceptibility testing is not routinely available in Australia, and globally, there are no standardised breakpoints for traditional culture-based methods. Although SQLE gene mutations have been associated with terbinafine resistance, a major research gap exists in the clinical interpretation of these mutations due to a lack of correlation between MIC values, genetic mutations and clinical treatment outcomes. This gap hampers the ability to guide clinical decision-making. Therefore, our objective was to assess the global prevalence of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton infections, identify the most clinically relevant resistance testing methods, and determine effective alternative treatment options. The study was designed by systematic review. Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane's Trials database (CENTRAL), Global Health (CABI), Trials registries, along with Google Scholar and Web of Science (WoS) for the tracking of included articles. Published human studies in English from 2000 to 2023 of Terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton Dermatophytosis with confirmed antifungal susceptibility tests and genotyping of dermatophytes, as well as details of effective alternative treatments. Identified cases were independently screened by two authors on the basis of predetermined criteria. Thirty four studies reported 743 samples for which mutation data of the SQLE gene and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) were available. Twenty three studies reported on 149 patients who had used terbinafine with available MIC data. Of these, 94 cases demonstrated evidence of clinical resistance to terbinafine with confirmed SQLE genotyping and MIC data. Seven studies reported on 13 cases of clinical resistance to terbinafine with a reported MIC and a successful alternative therapy. There are no published MIC breakpoints for terbinafine resistance in antifungal resistance testing, creating significant challenges for clinical interpretation. This study suggests that an estimate of a provisional MIC threshold for resistance is calculated to be 1.69 μg/mL. Importantly, SQLE mutation data, particularly the presence of F397L, L393F and A448T shows a robust association with clinical resistance to terbinafine (odds ratio: 7.58; 14.0, 7.78, respectively). Routine SQLE mutation testing in cases of suspected terbinafine-resistant dermatophytosis could enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform more effective, timely treatment decisions. Identifying specific mutations may guide clinicians in selecting alternative antifungal agents earlier in the treatment course, reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42022382880.

新出现的特比萘芬耐药毛癣皮癣,测试选择和替代治疗:系统综述。
皮肤真菌病是一种常见的皮肤浅表真菌感染,最常由毛癣属皮肤真菌引起。特比萘芬具有抑制角鲨烯环氧化酶(SQLE)的作用,被广泛用于一线治疗。然而,对特比萘芬的耐药性正在全球范围内增加,包括最近在澳大利亚的报告,其起源怀疑可追溯到南亚。在澳大利亚,抗真菌药敏试验不是常规可用的,在全球范围内,传统的基于培养的方法没有标准化的断点。尽管SQLE基因突变与特比萘芬耐药有关,但由于MIC值、基因突变与临床治疗结果之间缺乏相关性,因此在这些突变的临床解释中存在重大研究空白。这种差距阻碍了指导临床决策的能力。因此,我们的目的是评估特比萘芬耐药毛癣菌感染的全球流行情况,确定最具临床相关性的耐药检测方法,并确定有效的替代治疗方案。本研究采用系统评价法设计。Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR), Cochrane试验数据库(CENTRAL),全球健康(CABI),试验注册,以及谷歌Scholar和Web of Science (WoS),用于跟踪纳入的文章。2000年至2023年发表的抗特比萘芬耐药毛癣性皮肤癣病的英文人类研究,证实了抗真菌敏感性试验和皮肤癣菌的基因分型,以及有效替代治疗的细节。确定的病例由两位作者根据预先确定的标准独立筛选。34项研究报告了743个样本,其中SQLE基因的突变数据和最低抑制浓度(MIC)是可用的。23项研究报告了149例使用特比萘芬的患者,并有可用的MIC数据。其中,94例经证实SQLE基因分型和MIC数据显示对特比萘芬有临床耐药证据。7项研究报告了13例特比萘芬临床耐药病例,报告了MIC和成功的替代疗法。在抗真菌药耐药测试中,特比萘芬耐药的MIC断点尚未公布,这为临床解释带来了重大挑战。这项研究表明,估计耐药性的临时MIC阈值为1.69 μg/mL。重要的是,SQLE突变数据,特别是F397L、L393F和A448T的存在,显示了与特比萘芬临床耐药的强烈关联(优势比:7.58;14.0, 7.78)。在疑似特比萘芬耐药皮肤癣病例中进行常规SQLE突变检测可以提高诊断准确性,并为更有效、及时的治疗决策提供信息。识别特定的突变可以指导临床医生在治疗过程的早期选择替代抗真菌药物,减少发病率和改善结果。系统评价已在PROSPERO注册。试验注册:PROSPERO号:CRD42022382880。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal of Dermatology is the official journal of the Australasian College of Dermatologists and the New Zealand Dermatological Society, publishing peer-reviewed, original research articles, reviews and case reports dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in dermatology. Clinical presentations, medical and physical therapies and investigations, including dermatopathology and mycology, are covered. Short articles may be published under the headings ‘Signs, Syndromes and Diagnoses’, ‘Dermatopathology Presentation’, ‘Vignettes in Contact Dermatology’, ‘Surgery Corner’ or ‘Letters to the Editor’.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信