Surgical Lymph Node Staging in Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma: The EpSSG RMS 2005 Trial Experience.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17908-3
Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Johannes H M Merks, Florent Guerin, Timothy Rogers, Ross J Craigie, Gabriela Guillén, Federica De Corti, Patrizia Dall'Igna, Raquel Dávila Fajardo, Gianni Bisogno, Andrea Ferrari, Daniel Orbach, Meriel Jenney, Julia C Chisholm, Véronique Minard-Colin, Maya Cesen, Nina Jehanno, Laura S Hiemcke-Jiwa, Ilaria Zanetti, Beatrice Coppadoro, Alida F W van der Steeg, Max M van Noesel, Marc H W A Wijnen
{"title":"Surgical Lymph Node Staging in Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma: The EpSSG RMS 2005 Trial Experience.","authors":"Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga, Johannes H M Merks, Florent Guerin, Timothy Rogers, Ross J Craigie, Gabriela Guillén, Federica De Corti, Patrizia Dall'Igna, Raquel Dávila Fajardo, Gianni Bisogno, Andrea Ferrari, Daniel Orbach, Meriel Jenney, Julia C Chisholm, Véronique Minard-Colin, Maya Cesen, Nina Jehanno, Laura S Hiemcke-Jiwa, Ilaria Zanetti, Beatrice Coppadoro, Alida F W van der Steeg, Max M van Noesel, Marc H W A Wijnen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17908-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European pediatric soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study recommends a lymph node biopsy for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The aim of our study was to analyze the results of the lymph node sampling strategies used, such as sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and nodal sampling (NS), and compare the outcome of patients undergoing different nodal staging techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All non-metastatic (M0) patients registered in the EpSSG RMS 2005 study with an RMS of the extremity, presenting between 2005 and 2016, were included for analysis of the lymph node sampling techniques used. The secondary objective was to compare the results and outcome for the different sampling procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 198 patients, 144 had clinically/radiologically negative nodes (cN0), and 72/144 underwent a biopsy (26 SNB/46 NS). Final nodal status was upstaged to pN1 in 11/72 (15.3%) patients-6 after SNB and 5 after NS. In 54 radiologically malignant/suspicious-appearing nodes, 34 NS biopsies were performed, resulting in downstaging to N0 in 9/34 (26.5%) patients. 5-years overall survival (OS) of N0 patients versus N1 patients was 82.5% (95% confidence interval CI 74.7-88.0) versus 46.5% (95% CI 32.2-59.7). 5-years OS in N0 patients was not significantly different in biopsied and non-biopsied patients (p = 0.88). However, in N1 patients, survival was significantly better in biopsied compared with non-biopsied patients (p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lymph node staging plays a crucial role in determining appropriate treatment strategies. Pathology of sampled lymph nodes can upstage or downstage the lymph node status, guiding treatment decisions based on the stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7751-7761"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17908-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The European pediatric soft tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS 2005 study recommends a lymph node biopsy for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). The aim of our study was to analyze the results of the lymph node sampling strategies used, such as sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and nodal sampling (NS), and compare the outcome of patients undergoing different nodal staging techniques.

Methods: All non-metastatic (M0) patients registered in the EpSSG RMS 2005 study with an RMS of the extremity, presenting between 2005 and 2016, were included for analysis of the lymph node sampling techniques used. The secondary objective was to compare the results and outcome for the different sampling procedures.

Results: Of 198 patients, 144 had clinically/radiologically negative nodes (cN0), and 72/144 underwent a biopsy (26 SNB/46 NS). Final nodal status was upstaged to pN1 in 11/72 (15.3%) patients-6 after SNB and 5 after NS. In 54 radiologically malignant/suspicious-appearing nodes, 34 NS biopsies were performed, resulting in downstaging to N0 in 9/34 (26.5%) patients. 5-years overall survival (OS) of N0 patients versus N1 patients was 82.5% (95% confidence interval CI 74.7-88.0) versus 46.5% (95% CI 32.2-59.7). 5-years OS in N0 patients was not significantly different in biopsied and non-biopsied patients (p = 0.88). However, in N1 patients, survival was significantly better in biopsied compared with non-biopsied patients (p = 0.006).

Conclusion: Lymph node staging plays a crucial role in determining appropriate treatment strategies. Pathology of sampled lymph nodes can upstage or downstage the lymph node status, guiding treatment decisions based on the stage.

肢体横纹肌肉瘤的手术淋巴结分期:EpSSG RMS 2005试验经验。
背景:欧洲儿童软组织肉瘤研究小组(EpSSG) RMS 2005研究建议对四肢横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)进行淋巴结活检。本研究的目的是分析使用的淋巴结取样策略的结果,如前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)和淋巴结取样(NS),并比较采用不同淋巴结分期技术的患者的结果。方法:在EpSSG RMS 2005研究中登记的所有非转移性(M0)患者(RMS为肢体),在2005年至2016年期间提出,用于分析所使用的淋巴结取样技术。次要目的是比较不同抽样程序的结果和结果。结果:198例患者中,144例临床/放射学阴性淋巴结(cN0), 72/144进行了活检(26 SNB/46 NS)。11/72(15.3%)患者的最终淋巴结状态为pN1,其中6例接受SNB治疗,5例接受NS治疗。在54例影像学上表现为恶性或可疑的淋巴结中,34例进行了NS活检,9/34(26.5%)患者的分期降至N0。N0患者和N1患者的5年总生存率(OS)分别为82.5%(95%可信区间CI 74.7-88.0)和46.5%(95%可信区间CI 32.2-59.7)。活检组与非活检组5年OS无显著差异(p = 0.88)。然而,在N1患者中,活检患者的生存率明显高于未活检患者(p = 0.006)。结论:淋巴结分期对确定合适的治疗策略起着至关重要的作用。淋巴结标本的病理学可以突出或突出淋巴结的状态,指导基于分期的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信