Uncertainty and inequality preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A case study on Kenyan smallholder farmers

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Wannes Slosse , Kennedy Vaati Mutuku , Michaël de Clercq , Marijke D’Haese , Koen Schoors , Jeroen Buysse
{"title":"Uncertainty and inequality preferences in the Ultimatum Game: A case study on Kenyan smallholder farmers","authors":"Wannes Slosse ,&nbsp;Kennedy Vaati Mutuku ,&nbsp;Michaël de Clercq ,&nbsp;Marijke D’Haese ,&nbsp;Koen Schoors ,&nbsp;Jeroen Buysse","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines proposer behavior in the Ultimatum Game through a novel framework grounded in Prospect Theory, integrating uncertainty and inequality preferences. Drawing on experimental and survey data from 240 smallholder farmers in Siaya County, Kenya, we investigate how socio-economic characteristics and membership of producer organizations influence decision-making. By eliciting Certainty Equivalents to estimate individual-level probability weighting functions, we analyze the roles of sensitivity and pessimism as uncertainty preference parameters in shaping proposer behavior. We further explore inequality aversion and preferences for individually advantageous allocations by comparing participants’ theoretical utility-maximizing decisions, as predicted by the model, with their actual observed behavior. The findings reveal significant variations in decision-making across producer organization types, providing fresh insights into the behavioral foundations of economic decision-making in non-Western contexts. This study not only advances the methodological scope of Ultimatum Game analysis but also enhances the applicability of experimental approaches in diverse socio-economic settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804325000904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines proposer behavior in the Ultimatum Game through a novel framework grounded in Prospect Theory, integrating uncertainty and inequality preferences. Drawing on experimental and survey data from 240 smallholder farmers in Siaya County, Kenya, we investigate how socio-economic characteristics and membership of producer organizations influence decision-making. By eliciting Certainty Equivalents to estimate individual-level probability weighting functions, we analyze the roles of sensitivity and pessimism as uncertainty preference parameters in shaping proposer behavior. We further explore inequality aversion and preferences for individually advantageous allocations by comparing participants’ theoretical utility-maximizing decisions, as predicted by the model, with their actual observed behavior. The findings reveal significant variations in decision-making across producer organization types, providing fresh insights into the behavioral foundations of economic decision-making in non-Western contexts. This study not only advances the methodological scope of Ultimatum Game analysis but also enhances the applicability of experimental approaches in diverse socio-economic settings.
最后通牒博弈中的不确定性与不平等偏好:以肯尼亚小农为例
本研究以前景理论为基础,结合不确定性和不平等偏好,对最后通牒博弈中的提议者行为进行了研究。利用对肯尼亚Siaya县240名小农的实验和调查数据,我们调查了社会经济特征和生产者组织的成员资格如何影响决策。通过引入确定性当量来估计个体层面的概率加权函数,我们分析了敏感性和悲观主义作为不确定性偏好参数在塑造提议者行为中的作用。通过比较模型预测的参与者的理论效用最大化决策与他们实际观察到的行为,我们进一步探讨了对个人有利分配的不平等厌恶和偏好。研究结果揭示了生产者组织类型在决策方面的显著差异,为非西方环境下经济决策的行为基础提供了新的见解。本研究不仅拓展了最后通牒博弈分析的方法论范围,而且提高了实验方法在不同社会经济背景下的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信