Improving disaster resilience with causal machine learning for flood damage estimation

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mujungu L. Museru , Rouzbeh Nazari , Mohammad Reza Nikoo , Maryam Karimi
{"title":"Improving disaster resilience with causal machine learning for flood damage estimation","authors":"Mujungu L. Museru ,&nbsp;Rouzbeh Nazari ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Nikoo ,&nbsp;Maryam Karimi","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine Learning (ML) models have become a pivotal tool in the scientific community, successfully addressing complex problems across various domains, including flood risk management. Despite these advancements, traditional data-driven models often struggle when training data is scarce and primarily rely on correlation rather than causal relationships, making them vulnerable to shifts in data distribution. This paper introduces a Causally Informed Neural Network (CINN) framework that integrates causal prior knowledge as an inductive bias to improve flood damage predictions for residential properties and address these limitations. The proposed approach enhances model adaptability to unseen data distributions—an essential requirement for flood damage modeling. First, Deep End-to-End Causal Inference (DECI) is used to discover causal relationships and estimate their average treatment effects. These causal insights are then embedded into the neural network through causal weight initialization and causal regularization. The framework is validated using an enhanced National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) claims dataset from Hurricane Katrina, and its performance is benchmarked against six widely used ML models from previous studies. Results show that the discovered causal relationships align with domain knowledge, reinforcing the approach's credibility. The proposed CINN model achieves an average 22 % error reduction compared to traditional ML models, demonstrating its superior robustness and predictive accuracy. Additionally, a feature attribution experiment confirms that the model's decision-making process is consistent with the identified causal relationships, increasing interpretability and trust in its predictions. These findings highlight the potential of integrating causality into ML-based flood damage modeling, paving the way for more resilient and generalizable disaster risk assessment frameworks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"995 ","pages":"Article 180121"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725017619","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) models have become a pivotal tool in the scientific community, successfully addressing complex problems across various domains, including flood risk management. Despite these advancements, traditional data-driven models often struggle when training data is scarce and primarily rely on correlation rather than causal relationships, making them vulnerable to shifts in data distribution. This paper introduces a Causally Informed Neural Network (CINN) framework that integrates causal prior knowledge as an inductive bias to improve flood damage predictions for residential properties and address these limitations. The proposed approach enhances model adaptability to unseen data distributions—an essential requirement for flood damage modeling. First, Deep End-to-End Causal Inference (DECI) is used to discover causal relationships and estimate their average treatment effects. These causal insights are then embedded into the neural network through causal weight initialization and causal regularization. The framework is validated using an enhanced National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) claims dataset from Hurricane Katrina, and its performance is benchmarked against six widely used ML models from previous studies. Results show that the discovered causal relationships align with domain knowledge, reinforcing the approach's credibility. The proposed CINN model achieves an average 22 % error reduction compared to traditional ML models, demonstrating its superior robustness and predictive accuracy. Additionally, a feature attribution experiment confirms that the model's decision-making process is consistent with the identified causal relationships, increasing interpretability and trust in its predictions. These findings highlight the potential of integrating causality into ML-based flood damage modeling, paving the way for more resilient and generalizable disaster risk assessment frameworks.

Abstract Image

利用因果机器学习提高洪水灾害恢复能力
机器学习(ML)模型已经成为科学界的关键工具,成功地解决了包括洪水风险管理在内的各个领域的复杂问题。尽管有这些进步,传统的数据驱动模型在训练数据稀缺时往往会遇到困难,并且主要依赖于相关性而不是因果关系,这使得它们容易受到数据分布变化的影响。本文介绍了一个因果信息神经网络(CINN)框架,该框架将因果先验知识集成为归纳偏差,以改进住宅物业的洪水损害预测并解决这些局限性。该方法提高了模型对不可见数据分布的适应性,这是洪水灾害建模的基本要求。首先,使用深度端到端因果推理(DECI)来发现因果关系并估计其平均治疗效果。这些因果洞察然后通过因果权重初始化和因果正则化嵌入到神经网络中。使用来自卡特里娜飓风的增强型国家洪水保险计划(NFIP)索赔数据集对该框架进行了验证,并将其性能与先前研究中广泛使用的六种ML模型进行了基准测试。结果表明,发现的因果关系与领域知识一致,增强了方法的可信度。与传统的机器学习模型相比,所提出的CINN模型平均减少了22%的误差,证明了其优越的鲁棒性和预测精度。此外,一个特征归因实验证实了模型的决策过程与确定的因果关系是一致的,增加了其预测的可解释性和信任度。这些发现突出了将因果关系整合到基于ml的洪水灾害建模中的潜力,为更有弹性和可推广的灾害风险评估框架铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信