{"title":"Digital health literacy and trust in health information sources: A comparative study of university students in Japan, the United States, and India","authors":"Hirono Ishikawa , Rina Miyawaki , Mio Kato , Jessica Legge Muilenburg , Yuki Azaad Tomar , Yoko Kawamura","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid expansion of the Internet and social media has transformed health communication, highlighting the critical importance for digital health literacy - particularly during the “infodemics” of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined digital health literacy and online health information–seeking behaviors among university students - the digital native generation - in Japan, the United States, and India. A cross-national comparison across these culturally and technologically diverse countries provides insights into global variations in digital health literacy.</div><div>An online survey was administered to 1500 undergraduate students (500 per country) using the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) to evaluate their ability in utilizing digital health information. DHLI scores were compared across countries, and associated factors were analyzed.</div><div>The mean age of participants was 20.6 years. DHLI scores were significantly higher in the US (3.10 ± 0.38) than in India (2.94 ± 0.38) and Japan (2.89 ± 0.42). While students generally demonstrated strong operational skills, many lacked sufficient ability to critically evaluate information and contribute self-generated content, indicating the need for targeted educational support. Importantly, trust in online health information sources, rather than mere usage, was strongly associated with higher DHLI scores.</div><div>These findings highlight the importance of enhancing individual skills in identifying credible sources and increasing the availability of trustworthy digital health content, particularly from public agencies and official social media platforms. Future research should explore cultural and systemic factors underlying cross-country differences to inform targeted strategies for improving digital health literacy globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47780,"journal":{"name":"Ssm-Population Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101844"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ssm-Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827325000989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rapid expansion of the Internet and social media has transformed health communication, highlighting the critical importance for digital health literacy - particularly during the “infodemics” of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined digital health literacy and online health information–seeking behaviors among university students - the digital native generation - in Japan, the United States, and India. A cross-national comparison across these culturally and technologically diverse countries provides insights into global variations in digital health literacy.
An online survey was administered to 1500 undergraduate students (500 per country) using the Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI) to evaluate their ability in utilizing digital health information. DHLI scores were compared across countries, and associated factors were analyzed.
The mean age of participants was 20.6 years. DHLI scores were significantly higher in the US (3.10 ± 0.38) than in India (2.94 ± 0.38) and Japan (2.89 ± 0.42). While students generally demonstrated strong operational skills, many lacked sufficient ability to critically evaluate information and contribute self-generated content, indicating the need for targeted educational support. Importantly, trust in online health information sources, rather than mere usage, was strongly associated with higher DHLI scores.
These findings highlight the importance of enhancing individual skills in identifying credible sources and increasing the availability of trustworthy digital health content, particularly from public agencies and official social media platforms. Future research should explore cultural and systemic factors underlying cross-country differences to inform targeted strategies for improving digital health literacy globally.
期刊介绍:
SSM - Population Health. The new online only, open access, peer reviewed journal in all areas relating Social Science research to population health. SSM - Population Health shares the same Editors-in Chief and general approach to manuscripts as its sister journal, Social Science & Medicine. The journal takes a broad approach to the field especially welcoming interdisciplinary papers from across the Social Sciences and allied areas. SSM - Population Health offers an alternative outlet for work which might not be considered, or is classed as ''out of scope'' elsewhere, and prioritizes fast peer review and publication to the benefit of authors and readers. The journal welcomes all types of paper from traditional primary research articles, replication studies, short communications, methodological studies, instrument validation, opinion pieces, literature reviews, etc. SSM - Population Health also offers the opportunity to publish special issues or sections to reflect current interest and research in topical or developing areas. The journal fully supports authors wanting to present their research in an innovative fashion though the use of multimedia formats.