Does Restoration of Constitutional Alignment Improve Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hallie B. Remer BS , Bryan S. Brockman MD , Chukwuemeka U. Osondu MD, MPH , Hannah Mosher BS , Yvette Hernandez CCRP , Giovanni Paraliticci MD , Charles M. Lawrie MD, MSc , Juan C. Suarez MD
{"title":"Does Restoration of Constitutional Alignment Improve Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty?","authors":"Hallie B. Remer BS ,&nbsp;Bryan S. Brockman MD ,&nbsp;Chukwuemeka U. Osondu MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Hannah Mosher BS ,&nbsp;Yvette Hernandez CCRP ,&nbsp;Giovanni Paraliticci MD ,&nbsp;Charles M. Lawrie MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Juan C. Suarez MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While neutral mechanical alignment has been the gold standard for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), constitutional knee alignment is commonly nonneutral and varies widely among individuals. We aimed to determine if a bounded functional alignment strategy in robotic assisted TKA restored constitutional alignment and if this restoration resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent robotic TKA with a bounded functional alignment strategy at a single institution. Final intraoperative knee alignment was compared to calculated constitutional alignment, which was unknown to the surgeons during the procedure. PROs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) with a 1-year follow-up were compared between patients with a final knee alignment within 2° of constitutional alignment compared with those &gt;2° from calculated constitutional alignment. Mean changes in PROs were analyzed, and proportions achieving minimally clinical important difference between groups was determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 188 knees included, 52% (n = 98) were balanced within 2° of constitutional alignment. Despite significant differences in alignment changes between groups (2.0° vs 4.5°), no significant differences were observed in PRO measures. Mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improvement (25.0 vs 29.5), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (8.0 vs 7.7), and Mental Health (2.7 vs 1.2) scores were comparable. Similar proportions in both groups achieved minimally clinical important difference across all measures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While robotic bounded functional strategy restored constitutional alignment in half of cases, this did not result in superior PROs at 1 year. Achieving soft tissue balance within acceptable parameters of alignment and bony excision may be more important than precise restoration of prearthritic alignment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 101776"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125001633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While neutral mechanical alignment has been the gold standard for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), constitutional knee alignment is commonly nonneutral and varies widely among individuals. We aimed to determine if a bounded functional alignment strategy in robotic assisted TKA restored constitutional alignment and if this restoration resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent robotic TKA with a bounded functional alignment strategy at a single institution. Final intraoperative knee alignment was compared to calculated constitutional alignment, which was unknown to the surgeons during the procedure. PROs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) with a 1-year follow-up were compared between patients with a final knee alignment within 2° of constitutional alignment compared with those >2° from calculated constitutional alignment. Mean changes in PROs were analyzed, and proportions achieving minimally clinical important difference between groups was determined.

Results

Of the 188 knees included, 52% (n = 98) were balanced within 2° of constitutional alignment. Despite significant differences in alignment changes between groups (2.0° vs 4.5°), no significant differences were observed in PRO measures. Mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improvement (25.0 vs 29.5), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (8.0 vs 7.7), and Mental Health (2.7 vs 1.2) scores were comparable. Similar proportions in both groups achieved minimally clinical important difference across all measures.

Conclusions

While robotic bounded functional strategy restored constitutional alignment in half of cases, this did not result in superior PROs at 1 year. Achieving soft tissue balance within acceptable parameters of alignment and bony excision may be more important than precise restoration of prearthritic alignment.
全膝关节置换术中恢复体位排列是否能改善疗效?
虽然中性机械对齐一直是全膝关节置换术(TKA)的金标准,但体质性膝关节对齐通常是非中性的,并且在个体之间差异很大。我们的目的是确定机器人辅助TKA的有限功能对齐策略是否恢复了体质对齐,以及这种恢复是否导致了更好的患者报告结果(PROs)。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了在单一机构接受有限功能对齐策略的机器人TKA患者。最终术中膝关节对齐与计算的体质对齐进行比较,这是外科医生在手术过程中不知道的。在1年的随访中,对最终膝关节对齐在2°内的患者与计算的膝关节对齐2°内的患者进行了pro(膝关节置换术和患者报告的结果测量信息系统的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分)的比较。分析PROs的平均变化,确定两组之间达到最小临床重要差异的比例。结果188个膝关节中,52% (n = 98)的膝关节平衡在2°以内。尽管两组之间的对准度变化有显著差异(2.0°vs 4.5°),但在PRO测量中未观察到显著差异。关节置换术改善的平均膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(25.0比29.5)、患者报告的结果测量信息系统身体健康(8.0比7.7)和心理健康(2.7比1.2)评分具有可比性。两组中相似的比例在所有测量中都达到了最小的临床重要差异。结论:虽然机器人限制功能策略在一半的病例中恢复了体质对齐,但这并没有导致1年的优越PROs。在可接受的排列参数内实现软组织平衡和骨切除可能比精确恢复关节炎前排列更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信