Revealing Significant Differences in Horizontal Correlation Distances of E-Layer and F-Layer Based on COSMIC-2 GIS Data

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Shuo Liu, Tao Yu, Xiangxiang Yan, Yifan Qi, Yan Yu, Kezhi Huang, Zukang Dai
{"title":"Revealing Significant Differences in Horizontal Correlation Distances of E-Layer and F-Layer Based on COSMIC-2 GIS Data","authors":"Shuo Liu,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Xiangxiang Yan,&nbsp;Yifan Qi,&nbsp;Yan Yu,&nbsp;Kezhi Huang,&nbsp;Zukang Dai","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building an accurate background covariance matrix is crucial for ionospheric data assimilation. This matrix quantifies the correlations between grid points and governs the transition between data-driven and model-driven regions. Due to the ionosphere's layered structure and the diverse physical mechanisms operating at different altitudes, the correlation distances vary significantly across layers. While previous studies have primarily focused on Total Electron Content data or F-layer peak electron densities, the E-layer has received little attention. To address this gap, we analyzed the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 Global Ionospheric Specification (GIS) (COSMIC-2 GIS) data from 2020 to 2022, conducting the first study on horizontal spatial correlations in the E-layer (120 km). This study also compared the similarities and differences between the horizontal correlations of the E-layer (120 km) and F-layer (300 km). Our analysis examined how correlation distances vary with local time, geomagnetic latitude, and seasons. The results revealed significant differences in spatial coherence between the two layers: the F-layer exhibits a single-peak structure, with zonal correlation distances greater than meridional correlation distances, while the E-layer shows a more complex double-peak structure, with pronounced peaks at sunrise and sunset. Finally, we developed a horizontal correlation coefficient model based on dual-Gaussian functions at different altitudes. These findings enhance our understanding of ionospheric dynamics and support the construction of more accurate background error covariance matrices, ultimately improving ionospheric modeling and space weather forecasting accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building an accurate background covariance matrix is crucial for ionospheric data assimilation. This matrix quantifies the correlations between grid points and governs the transition between data-driven and model-driven regions. Due to the ionosphere's layered structure and the diverse physical mechanisms operating at different altitudes, the correlation distances vary significantly across layers. While previous studies have primarily focused on Total Electron Content data or F-layer peak electron densities, the E-layer has received little attention. To address this gap, we analyzed the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate-2 Global Ionospheric Specification (GIS) (COSMIC-2 GIS) data from 2020 to 2022, conducting the first study on horizontal spatial correlations in the E-layer (120 km). This study also compared the similarities and differences between the horizontal correlations of the E-layer (120 km) and F-layer (300 km). Our analysis examined how correlation distances vary with local time, geomagnetic latitude, and seasons. The results revealed significant differences in spatial coherence between the two layers: the F-layer exhibits a single-peak structure, with zonal correlation distances greater than meridional correlation distances, while the E-layer shows a more complex double-peak structure, with pronounced peaks at sunrise and sunset. Finally, we developed a horizontal correlation coefficient model based on dual-Gaussian functions at different altitudes. These findings enhance our understanding of ionospheric dynamics and support the construction of more accurate background error covariance matrices, ultimately improving ionospheric modeling and space weather forecasting accuracy.

基于COSMIC-2 GIS数据揭示e层与f层水平相关距离的显著差异
建立准确的背景协方差矩阵是电离层数据同化的关键。该矩阵量化网格点之间的相关性,并管理数据驱动和模型驱动区域之间的转换。由于电离层的层状结构和不同高度运行的不同物理机制,各层间的相关距离差异很大。以往的研究主要集中在总电子含量数据或f层峰值电子密度上,而e层很少受到关注。为了解决这一差距,我们分析了星座气象、电离层和气候-2全球电离层规范(GIS) (COSMIC-2 GIS) 2020 - 2022年的数据,首次对e层(120 km)的水平空间相关性进行了研究。本研究还比较了e层(120 km)和f层(300 km)水平相关性的异同。我们的分析考察了相关距离如何随当地时间、地磁纬度和季节而变化。结果表明,两层的空间相干性存在显著差异:f层为单峰结构,纬向相关距离大于经向相关距离,而e层为更为复杂的双峰结构,在日出和日落时出现明显的峰值。最后,建立了基于双高斯函数的不同海拔水平相关系数模型。这些发现增强了我们对电离层动力学的理解,并支持构建更精确的背景误差协方差矩阵,最终提高电离层建模和空间天气预报的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信