A. Clerc, G. Mollon, A. Ferrieux, L. Lafarge, A. Saulot, D. Deldique, A. Schubnel, L. Vieille
{"title":"Single-Asperity Friction and Wear in Seismic Faults: 1. Experiments on Marble","authors":"A. Clerc, G. Mollon, A. Ferrieux, L. Lafarge, A. Saulot, D. Deldique, A. Schubnel, L. Vieille","doi":"10.1029/2025JB031344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Common representations of seismic faults often fall into two categories. Either the model focuses on clean rough surfaces in sliding contact, or the model focuses on the gouge production and shearing between two smooth surfaces. In this work, we wish to reconcile these two main models by using tribological tools and concepts, in order to pave the way for a more accurate model of geometrically complex faults. A pin-on-disc experimental device is employed to investigate the response of a single asperity to shear sliding, in presence of granular gouge. Near co-seismic conditions are applied on Carrara marble samples (contact stress, contact area, sliding velocity) and real time acquisition sensors as well as post-mortem analyses on the contact surfaces provide qualitative and quantitative information on the frictional behavior of the downscaled lab fault. The results for moderate sliding velocity (0.01 m s<sup>−1</sup>) tests show a complex behavior. Three regimes are underlined, which highlights the interplay between granular gouge and asperities. The last regime is seen as a steady state with rough contact surfaces and the presence of a granular gouge layer. This observation leads to the conclusion that in a model for geometrically complex fault, granular gouge and asperities are not self-excluding and should be considered together. This work is complemented by a numerical model presented in a companion paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JB031344","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JB031344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Common representations of seismic faults often fall into two categories. Either the model focuses on clean rough surfaces in sliding contact, or the model focuses on the gouge production and shearing between two smooth surfaces. In this work, we wish to reconcile these two main models by using tribological tools and concepts, in order to pave the way for a more accurate model of geometrically complex faults. A pin-on-disc experimental device is employed to investigate the response of a single asperity to shear sliding, in presence of granular gouge. Near co-seismic conditions are applied on Carrara marble samples (contact stress, contact area, sliding velocity) and real time acquisition sensors as well as post-mortem analyses on the contact surfaces provide qualitative and quantitative information on the frictional behavior of the downscaled lab fault. The results for moderate sliding velocity (0.01 m s−1) tests show a complex behavior. Three regimes are underlined, which highlights the interplay between granular gouge and asperities. The last regime is seen as a steady state with rough contact surfaces and the presence of a granular gouge layer. This observation leads to the conclusion that in a model for geometrically complex fault, granular gouge and asperities are not self-excluding and should be considered together. This work is complemented by a numerical model presented in a companion paper.
地震断层的常见表现形式通常分为两类。该模型要么关注滑动接触中干净的粗糙表面,要么关注两个光滑表面之间凿泥的产生和剪切。在这项工作中,我们希望通过使用摩擦学工具和概念来调和这两个主要模型,以便为更精确的几何复杂断层模型铺平道路。采用针盘式试验装置,研究了存在颗粒状断层时单个粗糙体对剪切滑动的响应。近同震条件应用于卡拉拉大理石样品(接触应力,接触面积,滑动速度)和实时采集传感器,以及对接触面的后期分析,为缩小实验室断层的摩擦行为提供定性和定量信息。中等滑动速度(0.01 m s−1)试验的结果显示出复杂的行为。强调了三种制度,突出了颗粒状泥和凹凸不平之间的相互作用。最后一种状态被视为具有粗糙接触面和颗粒状泥层存在的稳定状态。由此得出结论,在几何复杂的断层模型中,颗粒状断层泥和凹凸不平不是自排斥的,应该一起考虑。这项工作是由一个数值模型提出的配套文件补充。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.