The Response and Recovery of Carbon and Water Fluxes in Australian Ecosystems Exposed to Severe Drought

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
C. Stephens, B. Medlyn, L. Williams, J. Knauer, A. Inbar, E. Pendall, S. K. Arndt, J. Beringer, C. M. Ewenz, N. Hinko-Najera, L. B. Hutley, P. Isaac, M. Liddell, W. Meyer, C. E. Moore, J. Cranko Page, R. Silberstein, W. Woodgate
{"title":"The Response and Recovery of Carbon and Water Fluxes in Australian Ecosystems Exposed to Severe Drought","authors":"C. Stephens,&nbsp;B. Medlyn,&nbsp;L. Williams,&nbsp;J. Knauer,&nbsp;A. Inbar,&nbsp;E. Pendall,&nbsp;S. K. Arndt,&nbsp;J. Beringer,&nbsp;C. M. Ewenz,&nbsp;N. Hinko-Najera,&nbsp;L. B. Hutley,&nbsp;P. Isaac,&nbsp;M. Liddell,&nbsp;W. Meyer,&nbsp;C. E. Moore,&nbsp;J. Cranko Page,&nbsp;R. Silberstein,&nbsp;W. Woodgate","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change-driven increases in drought risk pose a critical threat to global carbon and water cycles. However, ecosystem-scale responses remain poorly quantified, particularly for severe, multiyear drought events. We addressed this gap by examining ecosystem-scale carbon and water flux sensitivity to the extreme 2018–19 drought in Australia using data from 14 eddy covariance flux sites. The ecosystems span grasslands and semi-arid woodlands to tropical and temperate forests. The driest sites (classed as “grass” and “very dry”) experienced drastic productivity impacts, with a 65% decrease in Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) over 2 years relative to the pre-drought average. However, fluxes in “dry,” “seasonally wet” and “wet” ecosystems showed remarkable resistance, with no overall change in GPP. All sites recovered rapidly; carbon fluxes in the first post-drought year matched (and generally exceeded) those of a climatically similar pre-drought year. Drought responses were strongly mediated by ecosystem-specific strategies. The driest ecosystems showed direct coupling of productivity to water availability, while intermediate ecosystems (dry and seasonally wet) leveraged stored soil water to maintain evapotranspiration and productivity under drought. At these sites, water was conserved over wet periods (evapotranspiration &lt; demand, despite sufficient rainfall) and consumed over dry periods (evapotranspiration &gt; rainfall). This mechanism mitigating periodic water stress under high rainfall variability likely contributed to the notable drought resistance of the dry and seasonally wet sites. The monthly water deficit index (MWDI) emerged as a robust predictor of productivity across space, highlighting that short-term water availability deficits strongly influence overall ecosystem composition. Analysis of drought response mechanisms suggested rapid leaf loss under water stress, particularly at the driest sites. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for sub-surface water storage and diverse drought response strategies in vegetation models. We provide critical benchmarks for improving parameterization of plant-water relations, aiding efforts to inform climate-robust management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcb.70361","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Climate change-driven increases in drought risk pose a critical threat to global carbon and water cycles. However, ecosystem-scale responses remain poorly quantified, particularly for severe, multiyear drought events. We addressed this gap by examining ecosystem-scale carbon and water flux sensitivity to the extreme 2018–19 drought in Australia using data from 14 eddy covariance flux sites. The ecosystems span grasslands and semi-arid woodlands to tropical and temperate forests. The driest sites (classed as “grass” and “very dry”) experienced drastic productivity impacts, with a 65% decrease in Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) over 2 years relative to the pre-drought average. However, fluxes in “dry,” “seasonally wet” and “wet” ecosystems showed remarkable resistance, with no overall change in GPP. All sites recovered rapidly; carbon fluxes in the first post-drought year matched (and generally exceeded) those of a climatically similar pre-drought year. Drought responses were strongly mediated by ecosystem-specific strategies. The driest ecosystems showed direct coupling of productivity to water availability, while intermediate ecosystems (dry and seasonally wet) leveraged stored soil water to maintain evapotranspiration and productivity under drought. At these sites, water was conserved over wet periods (evapotranspiration < demand, despite sufficient rainfall) and consumed over dry periods (evapotranspiration > rainfall). This mechanism mitigating periodic water stress under high rainfall variability likely contributed to the notable drought resistance of the dry and seasonally wet sites. The monthly water deficit index (MWDI) emerged as a robust predictor of productivity across space, highlighting that short-term water availability deficits strongly influence overall ecosystem composition. Analysis of drought response mechanisms suggested rapid leaf loss under water stress, particularly at the driest sites. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for sub-surface water storage and diverse drought response strategies in vegetation models. We provide critical benchmarks for improving parameterization of plant-water relations, aiding efforts to inform climate-robust management strategies.

Abstract Image

严重干旱下澳大利亚生态系统碳和水通量的响应与恢复
气候变化导致的干旱风险增加对全球碳循环和水循环构成严重威胁。然而,生态系统规模的响应仍然缺乏量化,特别是对于严重的多年干旱事件。我们利用14个涡动相关通量站点的数据,研究了生态系统尺度的碳和水通量对澳大利亚2018-19年极端干旱的敏感性,从而解决了这一差距。生态系统跨越草原和半干旱林地到热带和温带森林。最干燥的地点(被划分为“草地”和“非常干燥”)经历了巨大的生产力影响,与干旱前的平均水平相比,2年内总初级生产力(GPP)下降了65%。然而,“干”、“季节性湿”和“湿”生态系统的通量表现出显著的抗性,总体上GPP没有变化。所有站点迅速恢复;第一个干旱后年份的碳通量与气候相似的干旱前年份相当(通常超过)。生态系统特异性策略在很大程度上介导了干旱反应。最干旱的生态系统表现出生产力与水分有效性的直接耦合,而中间生态系统(干旱和季节性潮湿)利用储存的土壤水分来维持干旱条件下的蒸散和生产力。在这些地点,水分在湿润期被保存(蒸散);需求,尽管降雨充足)和消耗在干旱时期(蒸散发>;降雨)。这种机制减轻了高降雨变率下的周期性水分胁迫,可能有助于旱地和季节性湿地显著的抗旱性。月水分亏缺指数(MWDI)作为空间生产力的可靠预测指标,强调了短期水分亏缺对整体生态系统组成的强烈影响。干旱响应机制分析表明,水分胁迫下叶片快速流失,特别是在最干旱的地区。我们的研究结果强调了在植被模型中考虑地下水储存和不同干旱响应策略的重要性。我们为改善植物-水关系的参数化提供了关键基准,有助于为气候稳健的管理策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信