Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning Bias Correction and Filtering for OCO-2: 1

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Steffen Mauceri, William Keely, Josh Laughner, Christopher W. O’Dell, Steven Massie, Robert Nelson, David Baker, Matthäus Kiel, Otto Lamminpää, Jonathan Hobbs, Abhishek Chatterjee, Tommy Taylor, Paul Wennberg, Sean Crowell, Britton Stephens, Vivienne H. Payne
{"title":"Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning Bias Correction and Filtering for OCO-2: 1","authors":"Steffen Mauceri,&nbsp;William Keely,&nbsp;Josh Laughner,&nbsp;Christopher W. O’Dell,&nbsp;Steven Massie,&nbsp;Robert Nelson,&nbsp;David Baker,&nbsp;Matthäus Kiel,&nbsp;Otto Lamminpää,&nbsp;Jonathan Hobbs,&nbsp;Abhishek Chatterjee,&nbsp;Tommy Taylor,&nbsp;Paul Wennberg,&nbsp;Sean Crowell,&nbsp;Britton Stephens,&nbsp;Vivienne H. Payne","doi":"10.1029/2025EA004328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) makes space-based radiance measurements of reflected sunlight. Using a physics-based retrieval algorithm, these measurements are inverted to estimate column-averaged atmospheric carbon dioxide dry-air mole fractions (XCO<sub>2</sub>). However, biases are present in the retrieved XCO<sub>2</sub> due to sensor calibration errors and discrepancies between the physics-based retrieval and nature. We propose a Random Forest (RF), a non-linear, interpretable machine learning (ML) technique, to correct these biases. The approach is rigorously validated, comes with quantified uncertainties, and is derived independent of carbon flux models. Compared to the operational approach, our method reduces unphysical variability over land and ocean and shows closer agreement with independent ground-based observations from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network. The RF-bias correction is suitable for integration into the operational processing pipeline for the next version of OCO-2 products, pending additional testing and validation. It is inherently generalizable to other existing and planned greenhouse gas monitoring missions. This paper (Part 1) describes the RF bias correction, while a second paper (Part 2) describes the development of a data filtering strategy specifically designed for a subset of retrievals exhibiting irreducible errors that remain inadequately corrected by the ML bias correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54286,"journal":{"name":"Earth and Space Science","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EA004328","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EA004328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) makes space-based radiance measurements of reflected sunlight. Using a physics-based retrieval algorithm, these measurements are inverted to estimate column-averaged atmospheric carbon dioxide dry-air mole fractions (XCO2). However, biases are present in the retrieved XCO2 due to sensor calibration errors and discrepancies between the physics-based retrieval and nature. We propose a Random Forest (RF), a non-linear, interpretable machine learning (ML) technique, to correct these biases. The approach is rigorously validated, comes with quantified uncertainties, and is derived independent of carbon flux models. Compared to the operational approach, our method reduces unphysical variability over land and ocean and shows closer agreement with independent ground-based observations from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network. The RF-bias correction is suitable for integration into the operational processing pipeline for the next version of OCO-2 products, pending additional testing and validation. It is inherently generalizable to other existing and planned greenhouse gas monitoring missions. This paper (Part 1) describes the RF bias correction, while a second paper (Part 2) describes the development of a data filtering strategy specifically designed for a subset of retrievals exhibiting irreducible errors that remain inadequately corrected by the ML bias correction.

Abstract Image

面向oco的不确定性感知机器学习偏差校正与滤波[2]:1
轨道碳观测站-2 (OCO-2)对反射阳光进行天基辐射测量。使用基于物理的检索算法,将这些测量值倒置,以估计柱平均大气二氧化碳干空气摩尔分数(XCO2)。然而,由于传感器校准误差以及基于物理的检索与自然之间的差异,在检索到的XCO2中存在偏差。我们提出一种随机森林(RF),一种非线性、可解释的机器学习(ML)技术,来纠正这些偏差。该方法经过严格验证,具有量化的不确定性,并且独立于碳通量模型推导。与操作方法相比,我们的方法减少了陆地和海洋的非物理变率,并与来自总碳柱观测网络的独立地面观测结果更加吻合。rf偏置校正适合集成到下一版本OCO-2产品的操作处理管道中,等待额外的测试和验证。它本身可以推广到其他现有的和计划中的温室气体监测任务。本文(第1部分)描述了射频偏差校正,而第二篇论文(第2部分)描述了专门为检索子集设计的数据过滤策略的开发,这些检索子集显示出不可减少的错误,这些错误仍然没有被ML偏差校正充分纠正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth and Space Science
Earth and Space Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Marking AGU’s second new open access journal in the last 12 months, Earth and Space Science is the only journal that reflects the expansive range of science represented by AGU’s 62,000 members, including all of the Earth, planetary, and space sciences, and related fields in environmental science, geoengineering, space engineering, and biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信