Empowering Democracy: Does Blockchain Unlock the E-Voting Potential for Citizens?

IF 3 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Margarida Roldão Pereira, Ian James Scott
{"title":"Empowering Democracy: Does Blockchain Unlock the E-Voting Potential for Citizens?","authors":"Margarida Roldão Pereira,&nbsp;Ian James Scott","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/6681599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The adoption of blockchain technology continues to grow, a direct result of its potential to provide new solutions to old problems in several industries, including the electoral sector. Blockchain technology is proposed to have the potential to address and overcome the traditional pen and paper scheme’s challenges and limitations, as well as trust concerns around more modern e-voting systems. Ultimately, with the aim to revert the recent downward trend in voter turnover, despite the interest and potential, there remains a significant research gap in understanding citizen response to this technology. This research is aimed at investigating whether citizens would be willing to embrace blockchain technology, as well as at exploring the factors that influence its adoption. A model designed to combine the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology methodology with an experimental approach is applied. The results of the study (<i>N</i> = 416) show that the intention to use blockchain-based e-voting systems can be predicted by five of seven constructs, that is, citizens are more likely to adopt e-voting systems when they perceive them to be effective, socially endorsed, enjoyable, trustworthy, and low in perceived risk. However, we do not find a direct influence of blockchain technology, over cloud-based e-voting, on voting intentions indicating that the benefits of this approach may not be well understood by consumers or may not drive the desired increase in voting intention. By understanding citizens’ willingness and concerns to adopt new voting technologies and the factors influencing this disposition, policymakers are better equipped to develop strategies on the development and implementation of electronic voting systems and can make informed choices about the use of blockchain technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/6681599","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/6681599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adoption of blockchain technology continues to grow, a direct result of its potential to provide new solutions to old problems in several industries, including the electoral sector. Blockchain technology is proposed to have the potential to address and overcome the traditional pen and paper scheme’s challenges and limitations, as well as trust concerns around more modern e-voting systems. Ultimately, with the aim to revert the recent downward trend in voter turnover, despite the interest and potential, there remains a significant research gap in understanding citizen response to this technology. This research is aimed at investigating whether citizens would be willing to embrace blockchain technology, as well as at exploring the factors that influence its adoption. A model designed to combine the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology methodology with an experimental approach is applied. The results of the study (N = 416) show that the intention to use blockchain-based e-voting systems can be predicted by five of seven constructs, that is, citizens are more likely to adopt e-voting systems when they perceive them to be effective, socially endorsed, enjoyable, trustworthy, and low in perceived risk. However, we do not find a direct influence of blockchain technology, over cloud-based e-voting, on voting intentions indicating that the benefits of this approach may not be well understood by consumers or may not drive the desired increase in voting intention. By understanding citizens’ willingness and concerns to adopt new voting technologies and the factors influencing this disposition, policymakers are better equipped to develop strategies on the development and implementation of electronic voting systems and can make informed choices about the use of blockchain technology.

Abstract Image

赋予民主权力:b区块链是否释放了公民的电子投票潜力?
区块链技术的采用继续增长,其直接结果是它有可能为包括选举部门在内的几个行业的老问题提供新的解决办法。区块链技术被认为有潜力解决和克服传统笔和纸方案的挑战和局限性,以及对更现代的电子投票系统的信任问题。最终,为了扭转最近选民流动率下降的趋势,尽管有兴趣和潜力,但在了解公民对这项技术的反应方面仍然存在重大的研究差距。本研究旨在调查公民是否愿意接受区块链技术,并探讨影响其采用的因素。将技术接受和使用的扩展统一理论与实验方法相结合,设计了一个模型。研究结果(N = 416)表明,使用基于区块链的电子投票系统的意图可以通过七个结构中的五个来预测,也就是说,当公民认为电子投票系统有效、社会认可、愉快、值得信赖、感知风险低时,他们更有可能采用电子投票系统。然而,我们没有发现区块链技术对投票意图的直接影响,这表明消费者可能不太了解这种方法的好处,或者可能不会推动投票意图的预期增加。通过了解公民采用新投票技术的意愿和关注点以及影响这种倾向的因素,政策制定者可以更好地制定开发和实施电子投票系统的战略,并可以就区块链技术的使用做出明智的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信