An economic and environmental analysis of retrofitted fuel cell electric heavy-duty trucks

IF 11 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Julius Hausmann , Achim Kampker , Tim Kemperdick , Peter Letmathe
{"title":"An economic and environmental analysis of retrofitted fuel cell electric heavy-duty trucks","authors":"Julius Hausmann ,&nbsp;Achim Kampker ,&nbsp;Tim Kemperdick ,&nbsp;Peter Letmathe","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The decarbonization of the freight transportation sector is posing significant challenges. Technical, economic, and environmental assessments have been conducted to determine the impact that alternative powertrains are having on the heavy-duty vehicle sector. However, the literature lacks information on how retrofitting might affect the outcomes. This article analyzes the effect of retrofitting on economic and environmental dimensions, both individually and in combination. We determine the most advantageous time frame for economically and environmentally effective retrofitting while considering potential trade-offs. Our methodology incorporates Total Cost of Ownership, Life Cycle Assessment, and Total Cost of Carbon Abatement. In addition to retrofitting costs, we also account for purchase costs, fuel costs, hydrogen prices, residual values, and other relevant cost categories in our model. Our findings indicate that the optimal timing of retrofitting in terms of both economic and environmental factors largely depends on the method of hydrogen production that is utilized. For fuel cell electric trucks to remain competitive, it is necessary to maintain a hydrogen price below 5 <span><math><mfrac><mtext>€</mtext><mrow><mi>k</mi><mi>g</mi><msub><mi>H</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></mfrac></math></span> when subsidies are in place. Our results show that, when no subsidies are in place, retrofitted fuel cell electric trucks are not competitive at all. Policymakers should offer greater certainty to fleet operators, should promote increased investments in renewable hydrogen production to reduce the levelized cost of hydrogen, and should approach policy instruments more comprehensively.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":246,"journal":{"name":"Applied Energy","volume":"399 ","pages":"Article 126455"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925011857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decarbonization of the freight transportation sector is posing significant challenges. Technical, economic, and environmental assessments have been conducted to determine the impact that alternative powertrains are having on the heavy-duty vehicle sector. However, the literature lacks information on how retrofitting might affect the outcomes. This article analyzes the effect of retrofitting on economic and environmental dimensions, both individually and in combination. We determine the most advantageous time frame for economically and environmentally effective retrofitting while considering potential trade-offs. Our methodology incorporates Total Cost of Ownership, Life Cycle Assessment, and Total Cost of Carbon Abatement. In addition to retrofitting costs, we also account for purchase costs, fuel costs, hydrogen prices, residual values, and other relevant cost categories in our model. Our findings indicate that the optimal timing of retrofitting in terms of both economic and environmental factors largely depends on the method of hydrogen production that is utilized. For fuel cell electric trucks to remain competitive, it is necessary to maintain a hydrogen price below 5 kgH2 when subsidies are in place. Our results show that, when no subsidies are in place, retrofitted fuel cell electric trucks are not competitive at all. Policymakers should offer greater certainty to fleet operators, should promote increased investments in renewable hydrogen production to reduce the levelized cost of hydrogen, and should approach policy instruments more comprehensively.
改装型燃料电池重型卡车的经济和环境分析
货运部门的脱碳正构成重大挑战。已经进行了技术、经济和环境评估,以确定替代动力系统对重型汽车行业的影响。然而,文献缺乏关于改造如何影响结果的信息。本文分析了改造对经济和环境两方面的影响,无论是单独的还是综合的。我们确定最有利的时间框架,经济和环境有效的改造,同时考虑潜在的权衡。我们的方法包括总拥有成本、生命周期评估和碳减排总成本。除了改造成本,我们还在模型中考虑采购成本、燃料成本、氢价格、残值和其他相关成本类别。我们的研究结果表明,就经济和环境因素而言,改造的最佳时机在很大程度上取决于所使用的制氢方法。为了使燃料电池电动卡车保持竞争力,在补贴到位的情况下,有必要将氢燃料价格维持在5欧元/加仑/加仑以下。我们的研究结果表明,在没有补贴的情况下,改装的燃料电池电动卡车完全没有竞争力。政策制定者应该为车队运营商提供更大的确定性,应该促进增加对可再生氢生产的投资,以降低氢的平准化成本,并且应该更全面地使用政策工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Energy
Applied Energy 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
10.70%
发文量
1830
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Applied Energy serves as a platform for sharing innovations, research, development, and demonstrations in energy conversion, conservation, and sustainable energy systems. The journal covers topics such as optimal energy resource use, environmental pollutant mitigation, and energy process analysis. It welcomes original papers, review articles, technical notes, and letters to the editor. Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that bridge the gap between research, development, and implementation. The journal addresses a wide spectrum of topics, including fossil and renewable energy technologies, energy economics, and environmental impacts. Applied Energy also explores modeling and forecasting, conservation strategies, and the social and economic implications of energy policies, including climate change mitigation. It is complemented by the open-access journal Advances in Applied Energy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信