Zheng Zhou , Yuheng Cao , Zhuolun Du , Meng Jiang , Yucheng Ren , Chunlong Li , Hengzhi Zhu , Dingjiang Chen , Yadong Yu , Ming Xu , Baohua Guo , Yong He , Bing Zhu
{"title":"Weaving through time: Stocks and flows of textile fibers in China (1978–2022)","authors":"Zheng Zhou , Yuheng Cao , Zhuolun Du , Meng Jiang , Yucheng Ren , Chunlong Li , Hengzhi Zhu , Dingjiang Chen , Yadong Yu , Ming Xu , Baohua Guo , Yong He , Bing Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Textiles are fabrics of daily life, relying on fibers as their core components. Despite growing research on fast fashion’s environmental impacts, systematic quantification of textile fiber flows and stocks remains limited. This study applies dynamic material flow analysis (dMFA) to track flows and stocks of nine types of fibers in China (1978–2022), the global leader in fiber and textile production. The findings indicate a marked transformation in textile production and consumption structure in China through time. China recorded a cumulative production of 1.09 Gt fibers and net export of 437 Mt fibers and textiles over the past 45 years. By 2022, 347 Mt fibers remained as stocks. Current textile waste recovery rate stands at 17 %, predominantly downcycling. Achieving closed-loop fiber-to-fiber recycling demands cross-value-chain collaboration. This quantitative assessment provides the foundation for understanding the complexity of the textile fiber system and paves the way for creating a circular textile fiber economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"223 ","pages":"Article 108522"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925004008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Textiles are fabrics of daily life, relying on fibers as their core components. Despite growing research on fast fashion’s environmental impacts, systematic quantification of textile fiber flows and stocks remains limited. This study applies dynamic material flow analysis (dMFA) to track flows and stocks of nine types of fibers in China (1978–2022), the global leader in fiber and textile production. The findings indicate a marked transformation in textile production and consumption structure in China through time. China recorded a cumulative production of 1.09 Gt fibers and net export of 437 Mt fibers and textiles over the past 45 years. By 2022, 347 Mt fibers remained as stocks. Current textile waste recovery rate stands at 17 %, predominantly downcycling. Achieving closed-loop fiber-to-fiber recycling demands cross-value-chain collaboration. This quantitative assessment provides the foundation for understanding the complexity of the textile fiber system and paves the way for creating a circular textile fiber economy.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.