The importance of spontaneous thought in the willingness to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Hideo Okuno , Satoru Arai , Motoi Suzuki , Toshiko Kikkawa
{"title":"The importance of spontaneous thought in the willingness to receive the human papillomavirus vaccine","authors":"Hideo Okuno ,&nbsp;Satoru Arai ,&nbsp;Motoi Suzuki ,&nbsp;Toshiko Kikkawa","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>After briefly suspending the 2-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2013, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) reinstated the recommendation that people receive the newly approved and updated 9-valent HPV vaccine in 2022. We investigated the influence of anticipated regret (AR) and spontaneous thought on individuals' willingness to receive the HPV vaccine, as the 2013 controversy over the HPV vaccine's side effects could lead to public distrust, impeding vaccination coverage despite government-funded initiatives. Using a Japanese-speaking online panel, we conducted a randomized controlled study based on a 3 (Intervention 1, questionnaire for AR: AR for inaction [ARI] vs. AR for action [ARA] vs. without AR) × 2 (Intervention 2, spontaneous thought: task with spontaneous thought vs. distraction) factorial design. Those assigned to the ARI scenario in Intervention 1 were given messages highlighting AR for HPV infection if they did not receive the vaccine, whereas those assigned to the ARA scenario were given messages emphasizing AR for the vaccine's side effects if they were vaccinated; participants assigned to the without AR group were given messages being not emphasizing any AR. In Intervention 2, participants assigned to the spontaneous thought group had 3 min to write freely their opinions about the HPV vaccine. In contrast, those assigned to the distraction group were asked to think about the HPV vaccine. After Intervention 2, we assessed the effects using several questionnaires. Among the 2140 participants, those in the ARI and those in the spontaneous thought groups expressed that female children would be highly willing to get vaccinated. However, no significant main effect of spontaneous thought on male children's willingness to get vaccinated was found; participants in the ARI and spontaneous thought conditions expressed the highest degree of willingness. In summary, spontaneous thought can mitigate the negative impacts of AR in a purely experiential setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 127469"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25007662","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After briefly suspending the 2-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2013, Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare (MHLW) reinstated the recommendation that people receive the newly approved and updated 9-valent HPV vaccine in 2022. We investigated the influence of anticipated regret (AR) and spontaneous thought on individuals' willingness to receive the HPV vaccine, as the 2013 controversy over the HPV vaccine's side effects could lead to public distrust, impeding vaccination coverage despite government-funded initiatives. Using a Japanese-speaking online panel, we conducted a randomized controlled study based on a 3 (Intervention 1, questionnaire for AR: AR for inaction [ARI] vs. AR for action [ARA] vs. without AR) × 2 (Intervention 2, spontaneous thought: task with spontaneous thought vs. distraction) factorial design. Those assigned to the ARI scenario in Intervention 1 were given messages highlighting AR for HPV infection if they did not receive the vaccine, whereas those assigned to the ARA scenario were given messages emphasizing AR for the vaccine's side effects if they were vaccinated; participants assigned to the without AR group were given messages being not emphasizing any AR. In Intervention 2, participants assigned to the spontaneous thought group had 3 min to write freely their opinions about the HPV vaccine. In contrast, those assigned to the distraction group were asked to think about the HPV vaccine. After Intervention 2, we assessed the effects using several questionnaires. Among the 2140 participants, those in the ARI and those in the spontaneous thought groups expressed that female children would be highly willing to get vaccinated. However, no significant main effect of spontaneous thought on male children's willingness to get vaccinated was found; participants in the ARI and spontaneous thought conditions expressed the highest degree of willingness. In summary, spontaneous thought can mitigate the negative impacts of AR in a purely experiential setting.
自发思想在接受人乳头瘤病毒疫苗意愿中的重要性
在2013年短暂暂停2价人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗后,日本厚生劳动省(MHLW)恢复了人们在2022年接种新批准和更新的9价HPV疫苗的建议。我们调查了预期后悔(AR)和自发想法对个人接受HPV疫苗意愿的影响,因为2013年关于HPV疫苗副作用的争议可能导致公众不信任,尽管政府资助了疫苗接种计划,但仍阻碍了疫苗接种覆盖率。使用日语在线小组,我们进行了一项基于3(干预1,AR问卷:不作为AR [ARI] vs.行动AR [ARA] vs.无AR) x2(干预2,自发思维:有自发思维的任务vs.分心)因子设计的随机对照研究。在干预措施1中被分配到ARI情景的人,如果他们没有接种疫苗,则被告知强调HPV感染的AR,而被分配到ARA情景的人,如果他们接种了疫苗,则被告知强调疫苗副作用的AR;被分配到无AR组的参与者被告知不强调任何AR。在干预2中,被分配到自发思维组的参与者有3分钟的时间自由写下他们对HPV疫苗的看法。相比之下,那些被分配到分心组的人被要求考虑HPV疫苗。干预2后,我们使用几份问卷来评估效果。在2140名参与者中,ARI组和自发思维组的参与者都表示,女性儿童非常愿意接种疫苗。自发性思维对男童接种意愿的主效应不显著;ARI和自发思维条件下的参与者表达了最高程度的意愿。总之,在纯粹的体验环境中,自发思维可以减轻AR的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信