Evaluation of psychology-based training for improving interoperability in the emergency services: A comparison of online and in-person delivery methods
Louise Davidson , Holly Carter , John Drury , Richard Amlôt , S. Alexander Haslam
{"title":"Evaluation of psychology-based training for improving interoperability in the emergency services: A comparison of online and in-person delivery methods","authors":"Louise Davidson , Holly Carter , John Drury , Richard Amlôt , S. Alexander Haslam","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent research highlights the importance of incorporating psychological perspectives to improve interoperability in multi-agency emergency response in order to address persistent challenges and prevent future issues. To address this, we developed a psychology-based training programme grounded in the Social Identity Approach. Its effectiveness and optimal delivery method were evaluated with 65 emergency responders from UK Police (<em>N</em> = 8), Fire and Rescue (<em>N</em> = 12), and Ambulance (<em>N</em> = 45) Services. Participants completed the training either online (<em>N</em> = 28) or in-person (<em>N</em> = 37), with follow-up interviews conducted with seven of the online participants. In terms of participant satisfaction, the training was positively received and recommended by participants. They valued the psychological elements but stressed the need for accessible presentation. Interviewees preferred in-person training, but survey data showed no difference in participant satisfaction between delivery methods. In terms of knowledge gain, both delivery methods increased confidence in multi-agency teamwork, though in-person training better enhanced knowledge of specific collaborative actions. Participants highlighted the importance of understanding responders’ motivations, especially regarding mandatory training. This evaluation offers valuable insights into the design and delivery of effective emergency service training and demonstrates how integrating psychological theory can support better interoperability in multi-agency contexts. Practical implications are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13915,"journal":{"name":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 105725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of disaster risk reduction","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420925005497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent research highlights the importance of incorporating psychological perspectives to improve interoperability in multi-agency emergency response in order to address persistent challenges and prevent future issues. To address this, we developed a psychology-based training programme grounded in the Social Identity Approach. Its effectiveness and optimal delivery method were evaluated with 65 emergency responders from UK Police (N = 8), Fire and Rescue (N = 12), and Ambulance (N = 45) Services. Participants completed the training either online (N = 28) or in-person (N = 37), with follow-up interviews conducted with seven of the online participants. In terms of participant satisfaction, the training was positively received and recommended by participants. They valued the psychological elements but stressed the need for accessible presentation. Interviewees preferred in-person training, but survey data showed no difference in participant satisfaction between delivery methods. In terms of knowledge gain, both delivery methods increased confidence in multi-agency teamwork, though in-person training better enhanced knowledge of specific collaborative actions. Participants highlighted the importance of understanding responders’ motivations, especially regarding mandatory training. This evaluation offers valuable insights into the design and delivery of effective emergency service training and demonstrates how integrating psychological theory can support better interoperability in multi-agency contexts. Practical implications are discussed.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR) is the journal for researchers, policymakers and practitioners across diverse disciplines: earth sciences and their implications; environmental sciences; engineering; urban studies; geography; and the social sciences. IJDRR publishes fundamental and applied research, critical reviews, policy papers and case studies with a particular focus on multi-disciplinary research that aims to reduce the impact of natural, technological, social and intentional disasters. IJDRR stimulates exchange of ideas and knowledge transfer on disaster research, mitigation, adaptation, prevention and risk reduction at all geographical scales: local, national and international.
Key topics:-
-multifaceted disaster and cascading disasters
-the development of disaster risk reduction strategies and techniques
-discussion and development of effective warning and educational systems for risk management at all levels
-disasters associated with climate change
-vulnerability analysis and vulnerability trends
-emerging risks
-resilience against disasters.
The journal particularly encourages papers that approach risk from a multi-disciplinary perspective.