A comparison of Bayesian sampling algorithms for high-dimensional particle physics and cosmology applications

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
The DarkMachines High Dimensional Sampling Group, Joshua Albert , Csaba Balázs , Andrew Fowlie , Will Handley , Nicholas Hunt-Smith , Roberto Ruiz de Austri , Martin White
{"title":"A comparison of Bayesian sampling algorithms for high-dimensional particle physics and cosmology applications","authors":"The DarkMachines High Dimensional Sampling Group,&nbsp;Joshua Albert ,&nbsp;Csaba Balázs ,&nbsp;Andrew Fowlie ,&nbsp;Will Handley ,&nbsp;Nicholas Hunt-Smith ,&nbsp;Roberto Ruiz de Austri ,&nbsp;Martin White","doi":"10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For several decades now, Bayesian inference techniques have been applied to theories of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics to obtain the probability density functions of their free parameters. In this study, we review and compare a wide range of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and nested sampling techniques to determine their relative efficacy on functions that resemble those encountered most frequently in the particle astrophysics literature. Our first series of tests explores a series of high-dimensional analytic test functions that exemplify particular challenges, for example highly multimodal posteriors or posteriors with curving degeneracies. We then investigate two real physics examples, the first being a global fit of the Λ CDM model using cosmic microwave background data from the Planck experiment, and the second being a global fit of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model using a wide variety of collider and astrophysics data. We show that several examples widely thought to be most easily solved using nested sampling approaches can in fact be more efficiently solved using modern MCMC algorithms, but the details of the implementation matter. Furthermore, we also provide a series of useful insights for practitioners of particle astrophysics and cosmology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":285,"journal":{"name":"Computer Physics Communications","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 109756"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Physics Communications","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010465525002589","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For several decades now, Bayesian inference techniques have been applied to theories of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics to obtain the probability density functions of their free parameters. In this study, we review and compare a wide range of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and nested sampling techniques to determine their relative efficacy on functions that resemble those encountered most frequently in the particle astrophysics literature. Our first series of tests explores a series of high-dimensional analytic test functions that exemplify particular challenges, for example highly multimodal posteriors or posteriors with curving degeneracies. We then investigate two real physics examples, the first being a global fit of the Λ CDM model using cosmic microwave background data from the Planck experiment, and the second being a global fit of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model using a wide variety of collider and astrophysics data. We show that several examples widely thought to be most easily solved using nested sampling approaches can in fact be more efficiently solved using modern MCMC algorithms, but the details of the implementation matter. Furthermore, we also provide a series of useful insights for practitioners of particle astrophysics and cosmology.
贝叶斯采样算法在高维粒子物理和宇宙学中的应用比较
几十年来,贝叶斯推理技术已被应用于粒子物理、宇宙学和天体物理学的理论中,以获得其自由参数的概率密度函数。在这项研究中,我们回顾和比较了广泛的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)和嵌套采样技术,以确定它们在类似粒子天体物理学文献中最常见的函数上的相对功效。我们的第一个系列测试探索了一系列高维分析测试函数,以举例说明特定的挑战,例如高度多模态后验或具有弯曲退化的后验。然后,我们研究了两个真实的物理例子,第一个是使用普朗克实验的宇宙微波背景数据对Λ CDM模型进行全局拟合,第二个是使用各种对撞机和天体物理数据对最小超对称标准模型进行全局拟合。我们展示了几个被广泛认为最容易使用嵌套抽样方法解决的例子,实际上可以使用现代MCMC算法更有效地解决,但实现的细节很重要。此外,我们还为粒子天体物理学和宇宙学的实践者提供了一系列有用的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Physics Communications
Computer Physics Communications 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
287
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: The focus of CPC is on contemporary computational methods and techniques and their implementation, the effectiveness of which will normally be evidenced by the author(s) within the context of a substantive problem in physics. Within this setting CPC publishes two types of paper. Computer Programs in Physics (CPiP) These papers describe significant computer programs to be archived in the CPC Program Library which is held in the Mendeley Data repository. The submitted software must be covered by an approved open source licence. Papers and associated computer programs that address a problem of contemporary interest in physics that cannot be solved by current software are particularly encouraged. Computational Physics Papers (CP) These are research papers in, but are not limited to, the following themes across computational physics and related disciplines. mathematical and numerical methods and algorithms; computational models including those associated with the design, control and analysis of experiments; and algebraic computation. Each will normally include software implementation and performance details. The software implementation should, ideally, be available via GitHub, Zenodo or an institutional repository.In addition, research papers on the impact of advanced computer architecture and special purpose computers on computing in the physical sciences and software topics related to, and of importance in, the physical sciences may be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信