Factors influencing farmer participation in bottom-up collaborative agri-environment-climate measures

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Menko Koch , Sebastian Lakner , Annika L. Hass , Jule M. Huber , Tobias Plieninger , Catrin Westphal , Stefan Schüler
{"title":"Factors influencing farmer participation in bottom-up collaborative agri-environment-climate measures","authors":"Menko Koch ,&nbsp;Sebastian Lakner ,&nbsp;Annika L. Hass ,&nbsp;Jule M. Huber ,&nbsp;Tobias Plieninger ,&nbsp;Catrin Westphal ,&nbsp;Stefan Schüler","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agri-environment-climate measures (AECMs) that focus on spatial coordination at the landscape level and the joint working of different actors represent a novel policy approach in Europe. As participation in AECMs generally depends on farmers' motivations and preferences, AECM design needs to consider their perspectives. In this respect, bottom-up collaborative AECMs become increasingly important, as they are driven by actor engagement and interaction. To investigate the factors influencing farmer participation in such approaches and assess their perceived importance, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 36 farmers in northern Germany. At the time of the interviews, the farmers had recently decided whether to participate in a novel bottom-up collaborative AECM initiative. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. We found that farmers' attitudes towards nature and administrative aspects were most relevant. Economics, farmers' curiosity, and social influences also played important roles. While many of these factors were shaped by past experiences, we identified characteristics specific to collaborative AECMs that influence farmers' decision-making. For example, spatial coordination, farmer-to-farmer communication, expert help or expected conflicts with others were found to have either a positive or negative impact. To increase participation, policymakers and collaborative AECM initiatives should utilise the positively perceived characteristics as levers. For instance, this could involve combining ecologically effective measures with non-monetary benefits, such as support structures and public outreach, as well as providing opportunities for farmers to exchange ideas and share success stories. However, such approaches should also take into account farmers’ level of experience with cooperation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103804"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agri-environment-climate measures (AECMs) that focus on spatial coordination at the landscape level and the joint working of different actors represent a novel policy approach in Europe. As participation in AECMs generally depends on farmers' motivations and preferences, AECM design needs to consider their perspectives. In this respect, bottom-up collaborative AECMs become increasingly important, as they are driven by actor engagement and interaction. To investigate the factors influencing farmer participation in such approaches and assess their perceived importance, we conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 36 farmers in northern Germany. At the time of the interviews, the farmers had recently decided whether to participate in a novel bottom-up collaborative AECM initiative. The interviews were analysed using qualitative content analysis. We found that farmers' attitudes towards nature and administrative aspects were most relevant. Economics, farmers' curiosity, and social influences also played important roles. While many of these factors were shaped by past experiences, we identified characteristics specific to collaborative AECMs that influence farmers' decision-making. For example, spatial coordination, farmer-to-farmer communication, expert help or expected conflicts with others were found to have either a positive or negative impact. To increase participation, policymakers and collaborative AECM initiatives should utilise the positively perceived characteristics as levers. For instance, this could involve combining ecologically effective measures with non-monetary benefits, such as support structures and public outreach, as well as providing opportunities for farmers to exchange ideas and share success stories. However, such approaches should also take into account farmers’ level of experience with cooperation.
影响农民参与自下而上农业环境气候协同措施的因素
农业-环境-气候措施(aecm)侧重于景观层面的空间协调和不同参与者的联合工作,代表了欧洲一种新的政策方法。由于农民对农业生态管理的参与通常取决于农民的动机和偏好,农业生态管理设计需要考虑农民的观点。在这方面,自下而上的协作aecm变得越来越重要,因为它们是由参与者参与和互动驱动的。为了调查影响农民参与这些方法的因素并评估其感知重要性,我们对德国北部的36名农民进行了定性深入访谈。在接受采访时,农民们最近决定是否参加一个新颖的自下而上的AECM合作倡议。访谈采用定性内容分析进行分析。我们发现,农民对自然的态度与行政管理方面的关系最为密切。经济、农民的好奇心和社会影响也发挥了重要作用。虽然这些因素中的许多都是由过去的经验形成的,但我们确定了影响农民决策的协作aecm特有的特征。例如,空间协调、农民与农民之间的沟通、专家帮助或与他人的预期冲突被发现会产生积极或消极的影响。为了提高参与度,政策制定者和AECM合作倡议应利用积极感知的特征作为杠杆。例如,这可能涉及将生态有效措施与非金钱利益相结合,例如支持结构和公众宣传,以及为农民提供交流思想和分享成功故事的机会。然而,这些方法也应该考虑到农民的合作经验水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信