Selective separation of fluorite from dolomite using cupferron: flotation performance and surface chemistry investigations

IF 6.9 2区 材料科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Xiao Wang , Shuai Yuan , Peng Gao , Jiahao He , Pengcheng Tian
{"title":"Selective separation of fluorite from dolomite using cupferron: flotation performance and surface chemistry investigations","authors":"Xiao Wang ,&nbsp;Shuai Yuan ,&nbsp;Peng Gao ,&nbsp;Jiahao He ,&nbsp;Pengcheng Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.164137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluorite and dolomite are difficult to separate due to their similar surface properties, as both are calcium-bearing minerals. In this study, the performance of cupferron as a collector for the selective flotation of fluorite and dolomite was compared with that of the conventional collector sodium oleate (NaOL) in the absence of depressants. Flotation experiments revealed that cupferron exhibits excellent selectivity for fluorite, whereas NaOL shows strong but non-selective collecting ability for both minerals. To elucidate the adsorption mechanism, various characterization techniques including contact angle measurements, FTIR, SEM, zeta potential analysis, XPS, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were employed. Both collectors interact chemically with mineral surfaces; however, cupferron demonstrates significantly stronger and more selective binding to fluorite via Ca–O coordination, forming a stable five-membered chelate ring involving its N–O functional groups. In contrast, NaOL shows comparable chemical affinity to both fluorite and dolomite surfaces, leading to poor selectivity. The calculated adsorption energy of cupferron on fluorite is much more favorable than that on dolomite, consistent with the experimental findings. These results provide valuable insights into the selective flotation mechanism of cupferron and demonstrate its potential as an efficient collector for fluorite–dolomite separation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":247,"journal":{"name":"Applied Surface Science","volume":"712 ","pages":"Article 164137"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Surface Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433225018525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluorite and dolomite are difficult to separate due to their similar surface properties, as both are calcium-bearing minerals. In this study, the performance of cupferron as a collector for the selective flotation of fluorite and dolomite was compared with that of the conventional collector sodium oleate (NaOL) in the absence of depressants. Flotation experiments revealed that cupferron exhibits excellent selectivity for fluorite, whereas NaOL shows strong but non-selective collecting ability for both minerals. To elucidate the adsorption mechanism, various characterization techniques including contact angle measurements, FTIR, SEM, zeta potential analysis, XPS, and density functional theory (DFT) calculations were employed. Both collectors interact chemically with mineral surfaces; however, cupferron demonstrates significantly stronger and more selective binding to fluorite via Ca–O coordination, forming a stable five-membered chelate ring involving its N–O functional groups. In contrast, NaOL shows comparable chemical affinity to both fluorite and dolomite surfaces, leading to poor selectivity. The calculated adsorption energy of cupferron on fluorite is much more favorable than that on dolomite, consistent with the experimental findings. These results provide valuable insights into the selective flotation mechanism of cupferron and demonstrate its potential as an efficient collector for fluorite–dolomite separation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

铜铁选择性分离白云石与萤石:浮选性能及表面化学研究
萤石和白云石都是含钙矿物,由于两者表面性质相似,很难分离。在不添加抑制剂的情况下,比较了铜铁作为捕收剂对萤石和白云石的选择性浮选性能与传统捕收剂油酸钠(NaOL)的性能。浮选实验表明,铜铁对萤石具有良好的选择性,而NaOL对萤石和铜铁均具有较强的非选择性捕收能力。为了阐明吸附机理,采用了各种表征技术,包括接触角测量、FTIR、SEM、zeta电位分析、XPS和密度泛函理论(DFT)计算。两种收集器都与矿物表面发生化学反应;然而,铜铁通过Ca-O配位与萤石的结合表现出更强、更强的选择性,形成一个稳定的含N-O官能团的五元螯合环。相比之下,NaOL对萤石和白云石表面的化学亲和力相当,导致选择性差。计算得到的铜铁在萤石上的吸附能要比在白云石上的吸附能有利得多,与实验结果一致。这些结果为铜铁的选择性浮选机理提供了有价值的见解,并证明了铜铁作为萤石-白云石分离的高效捕收剂的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Surface Science
Applied Surface Science 工程技术-材料科学:膜
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
3393
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Applied Surface Science covers topics contributing to a better understanding of surfaces, interfaces, nanostructures and their applications. The journal is concerned with scientific research on the atomic and molecular level of material properties determined with specific surface analytical techniques and/or computational methods, as well as the processing of such structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信