Emily N. Byers, Tiffany L. Messer, Craig Tobias, Daniel N. Miller, Christopher Barton, Jason Unrine, Carmen Agouridis
{"title":"Isotopically Tracing the Impact of Water Contaminant “Cocktails” on Nitrogen Pathways in Constructed Treatment Wetlands","authors":"Emily N. Byers, Tiffany L. Messer, Craig Tobias, Daniel N. Miller, Christopher Barton, Jason Unrine, Carmen Agouridis","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2025.124294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Constructed wetlands mitigate nitrogen (N) loads in surface runoff, yet implications of common contaminant “cocktail” mixtures to wetland N removal are relatively unexplored. A <sup>15</sup>N isotopic tracer was used to assess the impact contaminants from urban (imidacloprid, caffeine, and PFOS) and rural (atrazine, glyphosate, and sulfate) environments have on nitrogen (N) pathways in free-water surface wetlands (FWS) and floating treatment wetlands (FTW). Nitrate-N removal rates ranged from 0.20 to 0.68 d<sup>-1</sup> and were dependent on the contaminant mixture and wetland design. Of the enriched <sup>15</sup>N, biomass uptake accounted for 36.5 ± 30.7%, 6.3 ± 4.2% was denitrified and lost through air-water exchange, and 55.9 ± 24.4% was assumed to have been denitrified and transmitted through plant tissues or lost due to ebullition (bubbling). The FTWs had increased temporary storage of N while the FWSs had increased permanent removal. In the presence of contaminant mixtures, both designs observed a shift in the NO<sub>3</sub>-N removal pathway toward increased biomass uptake. Caffeine (59.7 ± 3.6%), PFOS (65.9 ± 8.8%), atrazine (92.0 ± 0.6%), and glyphosate (>89.1%) were effectively removed from the water with limited removal for SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup> (2.3 ± 12.3%). Findings elucidate implications to N fate and maintenance required (e.g., biomass harvesting) in two constructed pulse flow wetlands positioned in urban and rural landscapes while providing a clear understanding of how system design and water quality characteristics impact biogeochemical cycling.","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Constructed wetlands mitigate nitrogen (N) loads in surface runoff, yet implications of common contaminant “cocktail” mixtures to wetland N removal are relatively unexplored. A 15N isotopic tracer was used to assess the impact contaminants from urban (imidacloprid, caffeine, and PFOS) and rural (atrazine, glyphosate, and sulfate) environments have on nitrogen (N) pathways in free-water surface wetlands (FWS) and floating treatment wetlands (FTW). Nitrate-N removal rates ranged from 0.20 to 0.68 d-1 and were dependent on the contaminant mixture and wetland design. Of the enriched 15N, biomass uptake accounted for 36.5 ± 30.7%, 6.3 ± 4.2% was denitrified and lost through air-water exchange, and 55.9 ± 24.4% was assumed to have been denitrified and transmitted through plant tissues or lost due to ebullition (bubbling). The FTWs had increased temporary storage of N while the FWSs had increased permanent removal. In the presence of contaminant mixtures, both designs observed a shift in the NO3-N removal pathway toward increased biomass uptake. Caffeine (59.7 ± 3.6%), PFOS (65.9 ± 8.8%), atrazine (92.0 ± 0.6%), and glyphosate (>89.1%) were effectively removed from the water with limited removal for SO42- (2.3 ± 12.3%). Findings elucidate implications to N fate and maintenance required (e.g., biomass harvesting) in two constructed pulse flow wetlands positioned in urban and rural landscapes while providing a clear understanding of how system design and water quality characteristics impact biogeochemical cycling.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.