{"title":"Digital Interventions for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence: Systematic Review.","authors":"Paula Kuberka, Milly Hannah Johnston, Roz Shafran, Katharine Pike, Lucy Yardley","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising prevalence of anxiety and depression among adolescents highlights the need for accessible intervention solutions. The objectives of this systematic review were to (1) identify existing digital interventions for adolescent depression and anxiety, (2) assess the promise of those interventions, and (3) identify characteristics of promising interventions. Six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were used to conduct searches between September and October 2023. The searches were re-run in June 2024. Twenty studies met the criteria for inclusion, leading to the identification of 17 distinct interventions for analysis. The promise of the interventions was assessed through their effectiveness, the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework dimensions, and risk of bias. The evaluation of interventions' promise deemed three studies as \"Quite Promising,\" six as \"Slightly Promising,\" four as \"Inconclusive Promise,\" and seven as \"Not Promising.\" All promising interventions somewhat met the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance dimensions. Variability was observed in Template for Intervention Description and Replication characteristics, including rationale, intervention provider, length and frequency of intervention, and retention. Factors that potentially contribute to the success or limitation of digital mental health interventions among adolescents are discussed. The review underscores the need to enhance the methodological rigor and to evaluate and report the real-world impact of interventions to ensure they benefit a broader demographic of young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":520803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.05.021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The rising prevalence of anxiety and depression among adolescents highlights the need for accessible intervention solutions. The objectives of this systematic review were to (1) identify existing digital interventions for adolescent depression and anxiety, (2) assess the promise of those interventions, and (3) identify characteristics of promising interventions. Six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were used to conduct searches between September and October 2023. The searches were re-run in June 2024. Twenty studies met the criteria for inclusion, leading to the identification of 17 distinct interventions for analysis. The promise of the interventions was assessed through their effectiveness, the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance framework dimensions, and risk of bias. The evaluation of interventions' promise deemed three studies as "Quite Promising," six as "Slightly Promising," four as "Inconclusive Promise," and seven as "Not Promising." All promising interventions somewhat met the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance dimensions. Variability was observed in Template for Intervention Description and Replication characteristics, including rationale, intervention provider, length and frequency of intervention, and retention. Factors that potentially contribute to the success or limitation of digital mental health interventions among adolescents are discussed. The review underscores the need to enhance the methodological rigor and to evaluate and report the real-world impact of interventions to ensure they benefit a broader demographic of young people.
青少年中焦虑和抑郁的流行率不断上升,这突出表明需要提供可获得的干预解决办法。本系统综述的目的是:(1)确定针对青少年抑郁和焦虑的现有数字干预措施,(2)评估这些干预措施的前景,(3)确定有前景的干预措施的特征。六个数据库(PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar)被用于在2023年9月至10月之间进行检索。2024年6月重新进行了搜索。20项研究符合纳入标准,从而确定了17种不同的干预措施进行分析。通过干预措施的有效性、覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施、维护框架维度和偏差风险来评估干预措施的前景。对干预措施前景的评估认为,三项研究“非常有希望”,六项研究“略有希望”,四项研究“不确定”,七项研究“没有希望”。所有有希望的干预措施都在一定程度上满足了覆盖范围、有效性、采用、实施和维护方面的要求。在干预描述和复制特征模板中观察到可变性,包括基本原理,干预提供者,干预的长度和频率,以及保留。讨论了可能影响青少年数字心理健康干预成功或受限的因素。审查强调需要提高方法的严谨性,并评估和报告干预措施的实际影响,以确保这些干预措施使更广泛的年轻人受益。