Shear Bond Strength of Repair Materials by Different Polymerization Methods On 3D-Printed Denture Base.

IF 1.8
Yutaro Oyamada, Tomofumi Sawada, Atsuo Nakanishi, Hisatomo Kondo
{"title":"Shear Bond Strength of Repair Materials by Different Polymerization Methods On 3D-Printed Denture Base.","authors":"Yutaro Oyamada, Tomofumi Sawada, Atsuo Nakanishi, Hisatomo Kondo","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated shear bond strengths (SBSs) of denture repair materials using different polymerization methods to 3D-printed denture base (DLP) in comparison with auto- polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base (PMMA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>DLP and PMMA disks were fabricated, roughened using #400 silicon carbide abrasive paper, and treated with the primer/bonding of the respective repair material. An auto-polymerized denture repair material (PER) or a light-polymerized (MRB) denture relining material was polymerized on the disks. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. Half of the specimens underwent thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5-55 °C; TC). SBS testing was conducted (n=20 per group), and the fracture pattern was analyzed. The SBS data were analyzed using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and Weibull distributions with the maximum likelihood estimation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MRB specimens showed significantly higher SBS and Weibull characteristic strength values than PER specimens (P < .001), irrespective of the denture base material. No statistical differences were observed in Weibull modulus among the specimens, except PMMA-MRB specimens, which showed the highest values (P < .001). Thermal aging tended to decrease these values; however, no significant differences were observed between the non-TC and TC groups. Adhesive failure was dominantly observed in the specimens, except DLP-MRB specimens, which shifted to cohesive failures within the denture base.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The repairability of the DLP specimens was comparable to those of the PMMA specimens. Thus, the denture repair of the DLP denture base could be treated in the same manner as conventional PMMA denture base.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated shear bond strengths (SBSs) of denture repair materials using different polymerization methods to 3D-printed denture base (DLP) in comparison with auto- polymerized polymethyl methacrylate denture base (PMMA).

Materials and methods: DLP and PMMA disks were fabricated, roughened using #400 silicon carbide abrasive paper, and treated with the primer/bonding of the respective repair material. An auto-polymerized denture repair material (PER) or a light-polymerized (MRB) denture relining material was polymerized on the disks. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h. Half of the specimens underwent thermocycling (5,000 cycles, 5-55 °C; TC). SBS testing was conducted (n=20 per group), and the fracture pattern was analyzed. The SBS data were analyzed using non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis tests and Weibull distributions with the maximum likelihood estimation.

Results: MRB specimens showed significantly higher SBS and Weibull characteristic strength values than PER specimens (P < .001), irrespective of the denture base material. No statistical differences were observed in Weibull modulus among the specimens, except PMMA-MRB specimens, which showed the highest values (P < .001). Thermal aging tended to decrease these values; however, no significant differences were observed between the non-TC and TC groups. Adhesive failure was dominantly observed in the specimens, except DLP-MRB specimens, which shifted to cohesive failures within the denture base.

Conclusions: The repairability of the DLP specimens was comparable to those of the PMMA specimens. Thus, the denture repair of the DLP denture base could be treated in the same manner as conventional PMMA denture base.

不同聚合方法修复材料在3d打印义齿基托上的剪切结合强度
目的:研究不同聚合方式对3d打印义齿基托(DLP)修复材料的剪切粘接强度(sbs),并与自聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)修复材料进行比较。材料和方法:制作DLP和PMMA圆盘,使用#400碳化硅磨纸进行粗化,并使用相应修复材料的底漆/粘接处理。将自动聚合义齿修复材料(PER)或光聚合义齿衬材料(MRB)聚合在义齿盘上。所有标本在37°C蒸馏水中保存24 h。一半标本进行热循环(5000次,5-55°C;TC)。进行SBS试验(每组20例),分析断裂模式。SBS数据采用非参数Kruskal-Wallis检验和最大似然估计Weibull分布进行分析。结果:无论基托材料如何,MRB标本的SBS和Weibull特征强度值均显著高于PER标本(P < 0.001)。除PMMA-MRB样品威布尔模量最高(P < 0.001)外,各样品的威布尔模量无统计学差异。热老化有降低这些值的趋势;然而,在非TC组和TC组之间没有观察到显著差异。除DLP-MRB外,粘接破坏主要发生在义齿基托内。结论:DLP标本的可修复性与PMMA标本相当。因此,DLP义齿基托的义齿修复可以与传统PMMA义齿基托进行相同的处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信