Discrepancy in Crestal Bone Height Level for Adjacent Dental Implants, When is it Significant? A Retrospective Study With a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-Up.

IF 1.7
Najla S Kasabreh, Shima Malaikah, Hadyia Khurshid, Musa Q Khan, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Discrepancy in Crestal Bone Height Level for Adjacent Dental Implants, When is it Significant? A Retrospective Study With a Minimum of 1-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Najla S Kasabreh, Shima Malaikah, Hadyia Khurshid, Musa Q Khan, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study investigated the influence of discrepancy in crestal bone height between neighboring implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical and dental records and periapical radiographs of individuals with at least two adjacent implants were retrieved and analyzed. Records were divided into two groups according to the prosthetic part: non-splinted and splinted groups. Furthermore, groups were categorized by crestal bone height differences between the two adjacent implant platforms into < 0.75mm, 0.76-1.25mm,1.26-1.75, an >1.75mm. Radiographic measurements were performed at 3-time points: time of abutment placement (T0), 1-3 years follow-up (T1), and at the last visit (T2). Multilevel linear regression models using generalized estimating equations were used, with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six patient records with 120 implants (84 non-splinted (70%) and 36 splinted (30%)) were included. In the non-splinted group, the mean mesial mean bone loss (T2-T0) of the most posteriorly positioned implant was 2.9 mm, 3.1 mm, 3.4 mm, and 3.9 mm across height intervals. The mean distal bone loss of the most anteriorly positioned implant was 3.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.4 mm, and 3.9 mm across height intervals. In the splinted group, mean mesial bone loss was 1.1 mm, 2.1 mm, 2.7 mm, and 0.9 mm along different height intervals, while the mean distal bone loss was 1.6 mm, 2.1 mm, 1.6 mm, and 1.3 mm. Results from linear regression showed that non-splinted implants exhibit greater marginal bone loss progression as the vertical difference between adjacent implants increases (p<0.001). The splinted group showed 1.73 mm less bone loss than the non-splinted group at the mesial sides when both had the same CBHL difference (p<0.001) and 1.79 mm more bone loss on the distal side (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that marginal bone loss progression depends on the difference in crestal height and is aggravated in non splinted implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study investigated the influence of discrepancy in crestal bone height between neighboring implants.

Methods: Medical and dental records and periapical radiographs of individuals with at least two adjacent implants were retrieved and analyzed. Records were divided into two groups according to the prosthetic part: non-splinted and splinted groups. Furthermore, groups were categorized by crestal bone height differences between the two adjacent implant platforms into < 0.75mm, 0.76-1.25mm,1.26-1.75, an >1.75mm. Radiographic measurements were performed at 3-time points: time of abutment placement (T0), 1-3 years follow-up (T1), and at the last visit (T2). Multilevel linear regression models using generalized estimating equations were used, with a significance level of 5% (α=0.05).

Results: Fifty-six patient records with 120 implants (84 non-splinted (70%) and 36 splinted (30%)) were included. In the non-splinted group, the mean mesial mean bone loss (T2-T0) of the most posteriorly positioned implant was 2.9 mm, 3.1 mm, 3.4 mm, and 3.9 mm across height intervals. The mean distal bone loss of the most anteriorly positioned implant was 3.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.4 mm, and 3.9 mm across height intervals. In the splinted group, mean mesial bone loss was 1.1 mm, 2.1 mm, 2.7 mm, and 0.9 mm along different height intervals, while the mean distal bone loss was 1.6 mm, 2.1 mm, 1.6 mm, and 1.3 mm. Results from linear regression showed that non-splinted implants exhibit greater marginal bone loss progression as the vertical difference between adjacent implants increases (p<0.001). The splinted group showed 1.73 mm less bone loss than the non-splinted group at the mesial sides when both had the same CBHL difference (p<0.001) and 1.79 mm more bone loss on the distal side (p<0.001).

Conclusions: This study suggests that marginal bone loss progression depends on the difference in crestal height and is aggravated in non splinted implants.

相邻种植体牙冠骨高度差异,何时显著?至少1年随访的回顾性研究。
目的:回顾性研究相邻种植体间冠骨高度差异的影响。方法:检索和分析至少有两个相邻种植体的个体的医疗和牙科记录和根尖周x线片。记录根据假体部位分为两组:未夹板组和夹板组。根据相邻种植体平台间牙冠骨高度差分为< 0.75mm、0.76-1.25mm、1.26-1.75 mm、>1.75mm。在三个时间点进行放射测量:基牙放置时间(T0),随访1-3年(T1)和最后一次访问(T2)。采用广义估计方程的多水平线性回归模型,显著性水平为5% (α=0.05)。结果:共纳入56例患者记录,种植体120例(非夹板84例(70%),夹板36例(30%))。在非夹板组中,最后位种植体的平均中位平均骨丢失(T2-T0)在高度间隔上分别为2.9 mm、3.1 mm、3.4 mm和3.9 mm。大多数前位种植体的远端骨损失平均为3.1 mm, 3.3 mm, 3.4 mm和3.9 mm。在夹板组中,沿不同高度间隔,近端骨丢失平均为1.1 mm、2.1 mm、2.7 mm和0.9 mm,远端骨丢失平均为1.6 mm、2.1 mm、1.6 mm和1.3 mm。线性回归结果显示,随着相邻种植体垂直差的增加,非夹板种植体的边缘骨质流失进展更大(结论:本研究表明,边缘骨质流失进展取决于牙冠高度的差异,并且在非夹板种植体中加剧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信