Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7
A Ionescu, M Marin, N Bayrich, P Fennema, M I Nicolescu, R E Jung, A Dodi
{"title":"Abutment-free Tissue-Level Implants for Personalized Monolithic Zirconia Implant Crowns: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"A Ionescu, M Marin, N Bayrich, P Fennema, M I Nicolescu, R E Jung, A Dodi","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the peri-implant bone surrounding a new abutment free tissue-level implant design with classic tissue-level implants restored with titanium-base abutments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 and 2022 in patients requiring dental implants. A total of 53 patients received either a novel abutment-free tissue-level implant (n₁ = 50 sites) or a conventional tissue-level implant (n₂ = 50 sites). Patients were monitored for one year after prosthetic loading, with the primary endpoint being any change in hard tissue around the implant. Bone resorption was evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Longitudinal outcomes were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within patient correlations over time. The models incorporated treatment group, time, and their interaction, with statistical significance evaluated using Wald tests. Non-inferiority was assessed with one-sided p-values <0.025, while two-sided p-values <0.05 indicated statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in patient demographics or complications were found between abutment-free and conventional implants. However, abutment-free implants exhibited less buccal bone loss than traditional implants. The abutment-free implant group had significantly lower buccal bone loss (p-values of 0.025 and 0.024 for oral palatal/lingual bone and alveolar ridge width, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that abutment-free dental implants offer advantages in reducing buccal bone loss compared to conventional implants, potentially due to their ability to mitigate risks to peri-implant tissues. Further research is warranted to evaluate their long-term efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the peri-implant bone surrounding a new abutment free tissue-level implant design with classic tissue-level implants restored with titanium-base abutments.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2018 and 2022 in patients requiring dental implants. A total of 53 patients received either a novel abutment-free tissue-level implant (n₁ = 50 sites) or a conventional tissue-level implant (n₂ = 50 sites). Patients were monitored for one year after prosthetic loading, with the primary endpoint being any change in hard tissue around the implant. Bone resorption was evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Longitudinal outcomes were assessed using linear mixed models to account for within patient correlations over time. The models incorporated treatment group, time, and their interaction, with statistical significance evaluated using Wald tests. Non-inferiority was assessed with one-sided p-values <0.025, while two-sided p-values <0.05 indicated statistical significance.

Results: No significant differences in patient demographics or complications were found between abutment-free and conventional implants. However, abutment-free implants exhibited less buccal bone loss than traditional implants. The abutment-free implant group had significantly lower buccal bone loss (p-values of 0.025 and 0.024 for oral palatal/lingual bone and alveolar ridge width, respectively).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that abutment-free dental implants offer advantages in reducing buccal bone loss compared to conventional implants, potentially due to their ability to mitigate risks to peri-implant tissues. Further research is warranted to evaluate their long-term efficacy and safety.

个性化整体氧化锆种植冠的无基台组织水平种植:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较一种新型无基台组织水平种植体与钛基基修复的经典组织水平种植体的种植体周围骨。材料与方法:对2018 - 2022年间需要种植牙的患者进行回顾性队列研究。共有53名患者接受了新型无基台组织级种植体(n₂= 50个位点)或传统组织级种植体(n₂= 50个位点)。患者在假体装载后监测一年,主要终点是假体周围硬组织的任何变化。采用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估骨吸收。统计分析包括分类变量的Fisher精确检验和连续变量的Student t检验。使用线性混合模型评估纵向结果,以解释患者内部随时间的相关性。模型纳入治疗组、时间及其相互作用,采用Wald检验评估统计学显著性。非劣效性评价采用单侧p值结果:无基牙和常规种植体在患者人口统计学或并发症方面无显著差异。然而,与传统种植体相比,无基牙种植体的颊骨丢失较少。无基牙种植组颊骨损失显著降低(腭/舌骨和牙槽嵴宽度的p值分别为0.025和0.024)。结论:本研究结果表明,与传统种植体相比,无基牙种植体在减少颊骨流失方面具有优势,这可能是因为它们能够减轻种植体周围组织的风险。需要进一步的研究来评估它们的长期疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信