Biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic reinforcement of the linea alba with a novel method of positioning and fixation of polypropylene mesh, in an animal model.

IF 1.3
Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb405325
Thiago de Almeida Furtado, Álvaro Cota Carvalho, Marcelo Lopes Furtado, Luiz Ronaldo Alberti, Diego Paim de Carvalho Garcia
{"title":"Biomechanical evaluation of prophylactic reinforcement of the linea alba with a novel method of positioning and fixation of polypropylene mesh, in an animal model.","authors":"Thiago de Almeida Furtado, Álvaro Cota Carvalho, Marcelo Lopes Furtado, Luiz Ronaldo Alberti, Diego Paim de Carvalho Garcia","doi":"10.1590/acb405325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a new format of prophylactic mesh, with a new method of placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rabbits were randomly distributed into four groups: control rabbits without laparotomy group; sutured rabbits (SR); light-weight mesh rabbits (LWMR); and heavy-weight mesh rabbits (HWMR). The meshes were cut to a size of 10 cm in length by 1 cm in width. A longitudinal, median abdominal incision, 11 cm in length, was performed, followed by an incision over the linea alba, encompassing the entire thickness of the abdominal wall. On the 91st postoperative day, the animals were killed for linea alba scar evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference among the evaluated groups concerning elongation, maximum load, and elasticity modulus. HWMR and LWMR were statistically different from controls regarding elongation. As for the elasticity modulus, SR presented a higher mean when compared to the others. Microscopic visual analysis showed greater fibrotic scarring with a larger amount of implanted material in HWMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reinforcement of scars with polypropylene mesh does not increase tensile strength when compared to the use of sutures. Mesh implantation results in scar remodeling with greater fibrosis, leading to increased elongation. However, midline reinforcement using only sutures has greater elasticity than the groups reinforced with mesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":93850,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"40 ","pages":"e405325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273873/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb405325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a new format of prophylactic mesh, with a new method of placement.

Methods: Rabbits were randomly distributed into four groups: control rabbits without laparotomy group; sutured rabbits (SR); light-weight mesh rabbits (LWMR); and heavy-weight mesh rabbits (HWMR). The meshes were cut to a size of 10 cm in length by 1 cm in width. A longitudinal, median abdominal incision, 11 cm in length, was performed, followed by an incision over the linea alba, encompassing the entire thickness of the abdominal wall. On the 91st postoperative day, the animals were killed for linea alba scar evaluation.

Results: There was a significant difference among the evaluated groups concerning elongation, maximum load, and elasticity modulus. HWMR and LWMR were statistically different from controls regarding elongation. As for the elasticity modulus, SR presented a higher mean when compared to the others. Microscopic visual analysis showed greater fibrotic scarring with a larger amount of implanted material in HWMR.

Conclusion: The reinforcement of scars with polypropylene mesh does not increase tensile strength when compared to the use of sutures. Mesh implantation results in scar remodeling with greater fibrosis, leading to increased elongation. However, midline reinforcement using only sutures has greater elasticity than the groups reinforced with mesh.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一种新型聚丙烯网片定位和固定方法在动物模型中对白线预防性加固的生物力学评价。
目的:评价一种新型预防补片的效果,并采用一种新的放置方法。方法:将家兔随机分为4组:未开腹对照组;缝合兔(SR);轻型网兔(LWMR);和重型网兔(HWMR)。这些网被切成长10厘米宽1厘米的尺寸。在腹部正中做一个纵向切口,长11厘米,然后在白线上做一个切口,覆盖整个腹壁厚度。术后第91天处死动物进行白线瘢痕评价。结果:评估组在伸长率、最大载荷和弹性模量方面存在显著差异。在伸长率方面,HWMR和LWMR与对照组有统计学差异。在弹性模量方面,SR的平均值较高。显微视觉分析显示,HWMR中植入材料的量越大,纤维化瘢痕越大。结论:聚丙烯网片加固瘢痕与缝线加固相比,不增加瘢痕的抗拉强度。补片植入导致瘢痕重塑和更大的纤维化,导致延长增加。然而,仅使用缝线的中线加固比使用网格加固的组具有更大的弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信