NHS ward accreditation programmes and their effects on driving improvements in patient care standards and safety: a literature review.

Laura Parnham
{"title":"NHS ward accreditation programmes and their effects on driving improvements in patient care standards and safety: a literature review.","authors":"Laura Parnham","doi":"10.7748/nm.2025.e2166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ward accreditation programmes provide ward-to-board assurances of quality and safety, and have been implemented in NHS settings for a number of years. Locally implemented ward accreditation programmes aim to standardise care delivery, support clinical governance and foster continuous quality improvement, but the evidence on whether such programmes lead to improvements in patient care and safety is yet to be established. This article reports the findings of a literature review that explored whether ward accreditation programmes drive improvements in standards of patient care and safety in NHS settings. The findings suggest that ward accreditation programmes are drivers for identifying and communicating measurable improvements in patient care and safety outcomes, and can support identification of areas requiring improvement and highlight areas of excellence. However, it is vital that care standards and evaluation methods are continually reviewed, improved and updated to reflect current policy, recommendations and evidence. Further research is required to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NHS ward accreditation programmes and to inform future quality and safety initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":74325,"journal":{"name":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing management (Harrow, London, England : 1994)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nm.2025.e2166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ward accreditation programmes provide ward-to-board assurances of quality and safety, and have been implemented in NHS settings for a number of years. Locally implemented ward accreditation programmes aim to standardise care delivery, support clinical governance and foster continuous quality improvement, but the evidence on whether such programmes lead to improvements in patient care and safety is yet to be established. This article reports the findings of a literature review that explored whether ward accreditation programmes drive improvements in standards of patient care and safety in NHS settings. The findings suggest that ward accreditation programmes are drivers for identifying and communicating measurable improvements in patient care and safety outcomes, and can support identification of areas requiring improvement and highlight areas of excellence. However, it is vital that care standards and evaluation methods are continually reviewed, improved and updated to reflect current policy, recommendations and evidence. Further research is required to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NHS ward accreditation programmes and to inform future quality and safety initiatives.

NHS病房认证计划及其对推动患者护理标准和安全改进的影响:文献综述。
病房认证方案提供病房到董事会的质量和安全保证,并已在NHS设置实施了数年。地方实施的病房认证计划旨在标准化护理服务,支持临床管理和促进持续的质量改进,但是关于这些计划是否会改善患者护理和安全的证据尚未建立。本文报告了一项文献综述的发现,该文献综述探讨了病房认证计划是否推动了NHS设置中患者护理和安全标准的改进。研究结果表明,病房认证计划是识别和沟通患者护理和安全结果可衡量改进的驱动因素,可以支持识别需要改进的领域,并突出卓越的领域。然而,至关重要的是,必须不断审查、改进和更新护理标准和评估方法,以反映当前的政策、建议和证据。需要进一步的研究来评估NHS病房认证计划的临床有效性和成本效益,并为未来的质量和安全举措提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信