Having Their Cake and Eating it Too: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on the Dietary Behaviours of Family Carers of Persons With Dementia.

IF 2.2
Michael Smith, Natalie Dickinson, Nicholas Sculthorpe, Louise Ritchie, Rachel Kimble
{"title":"Having Their Cake and Eating it Too: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study on the Dietary Behaviours of Family Carers of Persons With Dementia.","authors":"Michael Smith, Natalie Dickinson, Nicholas Sculthorpe, Louise Ritchie, Rachel Kimble","doi":"10.1177/14713012251355832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> While dementia caregiving is known to place considerable demands on carers, its impact on carers' own dietary behaviours and nutritional health remains poorly understood. Understanding how caregiving impacts carers' diet quality is essential to inform supportive interventions. Purpose: This study aimed to explore the diet quality of family carers of persons with dementia and identify caregiving-related factors influencing their nutrition. <b>Methods:</b> A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed with 30 family carers completing a quantitative online survey and 10 participating in qualitative semi-structured interviews to provide contextual depth. The online survey included demographic data, dietary intake via a validated 24-h recall, diet quality using the 14-Item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and food insecurity using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). <b>Results:</b> Family carers were food secure according to the FIES, and their overall diet quality was moderate, with a mean MEDAS score of 6.6 ± 2.1. Eighty percent exceeded saturated fat and 43% exceeded free sugar intake recommendations. Only 33% of carers reported eating ≥5 portions of fruit and vegetables, with 23% meeting intake of dietary fibre. The findings from the semi-structured interviews demonstrated that caring for a family member with dementia could influence their own dietary behaviours, due to the practical aspects of caregiving and the evolving palates and capabilities of the person with dementia. <b>Conclusion:</b> Family carers of persons with dementia often fail to meet dietary recommendations despite moderate diet quality, with emotional burden, time scarcity, and competing priorities significantly influencing their own eating behaviours. These findings highlight the need for flexible, personalised interventions, such as digital tools, meal delivery services, embedded nutrition support, and peer network, that address carers' emotional stress, time constraints, and caregiving roles to improve their dietary behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251355832"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251355832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While dementia caregiving is known to place considerable demands on carers, its impact on carers' own dietary behaviours and nutritional health remains poorly understood. Understanding how caregiving impacts carers' diet quality is essential to inform supportive interventions. Purpose: This study aimed to explore the diet quality of family carers of persons with dementia and identify caregiving-related factors influencing their nutrition. Methods: A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed with 30 family carers completing a quantitative online survey and 10 participating in qualitative semi-structured interviews to provide contextual depth. The online survey included demographic data, dietary intake via a validated 24-h recall, diet quality using the 14-Item Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), and food insecurity using the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES). Results: Family carers were food secure according to the FIES, and their overall diet quality was moderate, with a mean MEDAS score of 6.6 ± 2.1. Eighty percent exceeded saturated fat and 43% exceeded free sugar intake recommendations. Only 33% of carers reported eating ≥5 portions of fruit and vegetables, with 23% meeting intake of dietary fibre. The findings from the semi-structured interviews demonstrated that caring for a family member with dementia could influence their own dietary behaviours, due to the practical aspects of caregiving and the evolving palates and capabilities of the person with dementia. Conclusion: Family carers of persons with dementia often fail to meet dietary recommendations despite moderate diet quality, with emotional burden, time scarcity, and competing priorities significantly influencing their own eating behaviours. These findings highlight the need for flexible, personalised interventions, such as digital tools, meal delivery services, embedded nutrition support, and peer network, that address carers' emotional stress, time constraints, and caregiving roles to improve their dietary behaviours.

鱼与熊掌兼得:痴呆患者家庭照顾者饮食行为的探索性混合方法研究
导言:虽然已知痴呆症护理对护理者提出了相当大的要求,但其对护理者自身饮食行为和营养健康的影响仍知之甚少。了解照护如何影响照护者的饮食质量,对于告知支持性干预措施至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨痴呆患者家庭照顾者的饮食质量,并找出影响其营养的护理相关因素。方法:采用并行混合方法设计,对30名家庭照顾者进行定量在线调查,10名参加定性半结构化访谈,以提供上下文深度。在线调查包括人口统计数据、经过验证的24小时召回的饮食摄入量、使用14项地中海饮食依从性筛查(MEDAS)的饮食质量,以及使用粮食不安全体验量表(FIES)的粮食不安全状况。结果:家庭照护者的FIES评分为食物安全,整体饮食质量一般,MEDAS评分平均为6.6±2.1分。80%超过饱和脂肪摄入量,43%超过游离糖摄入量。只有33%的护理人员报告每天吃5份以上的水果和蔬菜,23%的人摄入膳食纤维。半结构化访谈的结果表明,由于护理的实际方面以及痴呆症患者不断变化的味觉和能力,照顾痴呆症家庭成员可能会影响他们自己的饮食行为。结论:痴呆患者的家庭照顾者虽然饮食质量适中,但往往不能满足膳食建议,情绪负担、时间短缺和优先考虑的竞争显著影响其自身的饮食行为。这些发现强调需要灵活、个性化的干预措施,如数字工具、送餐服务、嵌入式营养支持和同伴网络,以解决护理人员的情绪压力、时间限制和护理角色,以改善其饮食行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信