Nicolas Rüsch, Christian Helms, Jana Hörger, Burkhard Höhle, Hendryk Bernert, Patric Muschner, Carolyn Rose, Patrick W Corrigan, Nadine Mulfinger, Peter Zimmermann, Gerd-Dieter Willmund
{"title":"The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program to decrease the impact of mental illness stigma among German military personnel: randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nicolas Rüsch, Christian Helms, Jana Hörger, Burkhard Höhle, Hendryk Bernert, Patric Muschner, Carolyn Rose, Patrick W Corrigan, Nadine Mulfinger, Peter Zimmermann, Gerd-Dieter Willmund","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to widespread stigma in the military, many military servicemembers with mental illness struggle with discrimination, self-stigma and decisions whether to disclose their condition. This study had the aim to evaluate the efficacy of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP), a four-session peer-led group program adapted to support military personnel with disclosure decisions and to reduce stigma's impact, in the German military.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-nine active servicemembers with mental illness were randomized to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. The two primary endpoints were stigma stress three weeks after baseline (T1/after HOP for HOP participants) and psychological quality of life six weeks after baseline (T2/after the HOP booster session). This randomized-controlled trial was registered before recruitment onset at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03218748).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, stigma stress decreased significantly among HOP participants at T1 (d = 0.64), while there was no significant effect of HOP on psychological quality of life at T2. HOP had significant positive effects on secondary outcomes at T2: overall quality of life, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, empowerment, well-being, attitudes to disclosure and to help-seeking, and secrecy. Reductions in stigma stress, secrecy, and marginally in overall quality of life (p = 0.055), remained significant twelve weeks after baseline (T3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial provides initial evidence that HOP for active military servicemembers is feasible and effective in terms of stigma stress, disclosure decisions, depressive symptoms, quality of life and well-being. HOP may be a valuable addition to mental health services and peer support in the military.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Due to widespread stigma in the military, many military servicemembers with mental illness struggle with discrimination, self-stigma and decisions whether to disclose their condition. This study had the aim to evaluate the efficacy of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP), a four-session peer-led group program adapted to support military personnel with disclosure decisions and to reduce stigma's impact, in the German military.
Methods: Ninety-nine active servicemembers with mental illness were randomized to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. The two primary endpoints were stigma stress three weeks after baseline (T1/after HOP for HOP participants) and psychological quality of life six weeks after baseline (T2/after the HOP booster session). This randomized-controlled trial was registered before recruitment onset at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03218748).
Results: Compared to the control group, stigma stress decreased significantly among HOP participants at T1 (d = 0.64), while there was no significant effect of HOP on psychological quality of life at T2. HOP had significant positive effects on secondary outcomes at T2: overall quality of life, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, empowerment, well-being, attitudes to disclosure and to help-seeking, and secrecy. Reductions in stigma stress, secrecy, and marginally in overall quality of life (p = 0.055), remained significant twelve weeks after baseline (T3).
Conclusion: This trial provides initial evidence that HOP for active military servicemembers is feasible and effective in terms of stigma stress, disclosure decisions, depressive symptoms, quality of life and well-being. HOP may be a valuable addition to mental health services and peer support in the military.
期刊介绍:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic.
In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation.
Both original work and review articles may be submitted.