The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program to decrease the impact of mental illness stigma among German military personnel: randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Nicolas Rüsch, Christian Helms, Jana Hörger, Burkhard Höhle, Hendryk Bernert, Patric Muschner, Carolyn Rose, Patrick W Corrigan, Nadine Mulfinger, Peter Zimmermann, Gerd-Dieter Willmund
{"title":"The peer-led Honest, Open, Proud program to decrease the impact of mental illness stigma among German military personnel: randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Nicolas Rüsch, Christian Helms, Jana Hörger, Burkhard Höhle, Hendryk Bernert, Patric Muschner, Carolyn Rose, Patrick W Corrigan, Nadine Mulfinger, Peter Zimmermann, Gerd-Dieter Willmund","doi":"10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Due to widespread stigma in the military, many military servicemembers with mental illness struggle with discrimination, self-stigma and decisions whether to disclose their condition. This study had the aim to evaluate the efficacy of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP), a four-session peer-led group program adapted to support military personnel with disclosure decisions and to reduce stigma's impact, in the German military.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-nine active servicemembers with mental illness were randomized to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. The two primary endpoints were stigma stress three weeks after baseline (T1/after HOP for HOP participants) and psychological quality of life six weeks after baseline (T2/after the HOP booster session). This randomized-controlled trial was registered before recruitment onset at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03218748).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, stigma stress decreased significantly among HOP participants at T1 (d = 0.64), while there was no significant effect of HOP on psychological quality of life at T2. HOP had significant positive effects on secondary outcomes at T2: overall quality of life, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, empowerment, well-being, attitudes to disclosure and to help-seeking, and secrecy. Reductions in stigma stress, secrecy, and marginally in overall quality of life (p = 0.055), remained significant twelve weeks after baseline (T3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This trial provides initial evidence that HOP for active military servicemembers is feasible and effective in terms of stigma stress, disclosure decisions, depressive symptoms, quality of life and well-being. HOP may be a valuable addition to mental health services and peer support in the military.</p>","PeriodicalId":49510,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-025-02960-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Due to widespread stigma in the military, many military servicemembers with mental illness struggle with discrimination, self-stigma and decisions whether to disclose their condition. This study had the aim to evaluate the efficacy of Honest, Open, Proud (HOP), a four-session peer-led group program adapted to support military personnel with disclosure decisions and to reduce stigma's impact, in the German military.

Methods: Ninety-nine active servicemembers with mental illness were randomized to HOP and treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. The two primary endpoints were stigma stress three weeks after baseline (T1/after HOP for HOP participants) and psychological quality of life six weeks after baseline (T2/after the HOP booster session). This randomized-controlled trial was registered before recruitment onset at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03218748).

Results: Compared to the control group, stigma stress decreased significantly among HOP participants at T1 (d = 0.64), while there was no significant effect of HOP on psychological quality of life at T2. HOP had significant positive effects on secondary outcomes at T2: overall quality of life, self-stigma, depressive symptoms, empowerment, well-being, attitudes to disclosure and to help-seeking, and secrecy. Reductions in stigma stress, secrecy, and marginally in overall quality of life (p = 0.055), remained significant twelve weeks after baseline (T3).

Conclusion: This trial provides initial evidence that HOP for active military servicemembers is feasible and effective in terms of stigma stress, disclosure decisions, depressive symptoms, quality of life and well-being. HOP may be a valuable addition to mental health services and peer support in the military.

以同行为主导的诚实、开放、自豪项目,旨在减少德国军人对精神疾病的耻辱感:随机对照试验。
目的:由于军队中普遍存在的耻辱感,许多患有精神疾病的军人都在与歧视、自我耻辱感作斗争,并决定是否披露自己的病情。这项研究的目的是评估诚实,开放,骄傲(HOP)的有效性,这是一个四期同伴主导的小组项目,适用于支持军事人员做出披露决定,并减少耻辱的影响,在德国军队中。方法:将99名患有精神疾病的现役军人随机分为常规治疗组(TAU)和单纯治疗组(TAU)。两个主要终点是基线后三周的病耻感压力(HOP参与者的T1/ HOP后)和基线后六周的心理生活质量(T2/ HOP增强期后)。该随机对照试验在招募开始前在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03218748)。结果:与对照组相比,在T1时,HOP参与者的耻辱感应激显著降低(d = 0.64),而在T2时,HOP对心理生活质量无显著影响。HOP对T2的次要结局有显著的积极影响:总体生活质量、自我耻辱感、抑郁症状、赋权、幸福感、对披露和寻求帮助的态度以及保密。在基线(T3) 12周后,病耻感压力、保密性和总体生活质量的降低(p = 0.055)仍然显著。结论:本试验初步证明了HOP对现役军人在耻辱压力、披露决策、抑郁症状、生活质量和幸福感方面是可行和有效的。HOP可能是军队中心理健康服务和同伴支持的一个有价值的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology is intended to provide a medium for the prompt publication of scientific contributions concerned with all aspects of the epidemiology of psychiatric disorders - social, biological and genetic. In addition, the journal has a particular focus on the effects of social conditions upon behaviour and the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the social environment. Contributions may be of a clinical nature provided they relate to social issues, or they may deal with specialised investigations in the fields of social psychology, sociology, anthropology, epidemiology, health service research, health economies or public mental health. We will publish papers on cross-cultural and trans-cultural themes. We do not publish case studies or small case series. While we will publish studies of reliability and validity of new instruments of interest to our readership, we will not publish articles reporting on the performance of established instruments in translation. Both original work and review articles may be submitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信