How does vertical reading affect saccade programming and lexical processing in the Roman script?

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Zeynep G Özkan, Jukka Hyönä, Maria Fernández-López, Manuel Perea
{"title":"How does vertical reading affect saccade programming and lexical processing in the Roman script?","authors":"Zeynep G Özkan, Jukka Hyönä, Maria Fernández-López, Manuel Perea","doi":"10.1007/s00426-025-02154-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although computational models of eye movement control in reading have focused on horizontal text layouts, vertically oriented text is also encountered in daily life in the Roman script. To examine the interplay between saccade programming and lexical processing under vertical reading in the Roman script, we manipulated (1) the layout of words in a sentence (horizontal vs. vertical) and (2) word frequency (high vs. low). In the vertical layout, the words themselves remained in standard orientation but were arranged vertically (one below the other). Eye-movement measures at the sentence level (e.g., total reading time, number of fixations) showed a cost for the vertical arrangement, primarily reflected in longer fixation durations rather than a greater number of fixations. Critically, at the target-word level, the word-frequency effect -which increased in later eye-fixation measures (gaze duration, total time)- remained similar in size across both layouts. The additive pattern of word frequency and text layout, supported by Bayes factors, suggests that slower saccade programming in the vertical format does not substantially impact lexical processing. While lexical processing can influence saccade programming, delays in saccade programming do not, in turn, alter lexical processing-a pattern that constrains current models of eye movement control in reading.</p>","PeriodicalId":48184,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","volume":"89 4","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12283434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-025-02154-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although computational models of eye movement control in reading have focused on horizontal text layouts, vertically oriented text is also encountered in daily life in the Roman script. To examine the interplay between saccade programming and lexical processing under vertical reading in the Roman script, we manipulated (1) the layout of words in a sentence (horizontal vs. vertical) and (2) word frequency (high vs. low). In the vertical layout, the words themselves remained in standard orientation but were arranged vertically (one below the other). Eye-movement measures at the sentence level (e.g., total reading time, number of fixations) showed a cost for the vertical arrangement, primarily reflected in longer fixation durations rather than a greater number of fixations. Critically, at the target-word level, the word-frequency effect -which increased in later eye-fixation measures (gaze duration, total time)- remained similar in size across both layouts. The additive pattern of word frequency and text layout, supported by Bayes factors, suggests that slower saccade programming in the vertical format does not substantially impact lexical processing. While lexical processing can influence saccade programming, delays in saccade programming do not, in turn, alter lexical processing-a pattern that constrains current models of eye movement control in reading.

垂直阅读如何影响罗马文字的扫视编程和词汇处理?
虽然阅读中眼动控制的计算模型主要集中在水平文本布局上,但在日常生活中,罗马文字也会遇到垂直方向的文本。为了研究垂直阅读罗马文字时扫视编程和词汇处理之间的相互作用,我们操纵了(1)句子中单词的布局(水平vs垂直)和(2)单词的频率(高vs低)。在垂直布局中,单词本身保持标准方向,但垂直排列(一个在另一个下面)。句子水平的眼动测量(如总阅读时间、注视次数)显示了垂直排列的成本,主要体现在更长的注视持续时间而不是更多的注视次数上。至关重要的是,在目标单词水平上,词频效应——在之后的注视测量中(凝视持续时间,总时间)有所增加——在两种布局中保持相似的大小。在贝叶斯因子的支持下,词频和文本布局的叠加模式表明,纵向格式下较慢的扫视编程不会对词汇处理产生实质性影响。虽然词汇处理可以影响扫视编程,但扫视编程的延迟不会反过来改变词汇处理——这种模式限制了当前阅读时眼动控制的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of human perception, attention, memory, and action. The Journal is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge based on firm experimental ground, but not to particular approaches or schools of thought. Theoretical and historical papers are welcome to the extent that they serve this general purpose; papers of an applied nature are acceptable if they contribute to basic understanding or serve to bridge the often felt gap between basic and applied research in the field covered by the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信